DOUG GROW: "DAYTON DOESN'T CREATE TINGLES OF EXCITEMENT"
I never would have guessed that Dayton scored low on 'schmoozability' scales.
##
"Dayton's speech about Rice and the veracity of the administration obviously had no impact on the Senate. On Wednesday, senators voted 85 to 13 to confirm Rice.
The one-sided nature of the vote could be seen as underscoring the commonly held view that Dayton, who is up for reelection in 2006, is a vulnerable target for the Republican Party.
But it is just as possible to see him as a national leader of opposition to the administration.
Right off, that may seem an absurd proposition. Dayton doesn't create tingles of excitement -- except among Republicans eager to run against him. He has jarring syntax (it's more powerful to read a Dayton speech than to hear one). And he grades low on 'schmoozability' scales." Source: Star Tribune, January 27, 2005
##
"Dayton's speech about Rice and the veracity of the administration obviously had no impact on the Senate. On Wednesday, senators voted 85 to 13 to confirm Rice.
The one-sided nature of the vote could be seen as underscoring the commonly held view that Dayton, who is up for reelection in 2006, is a vulnerable target for the Republican Party.
But it is just as possible to see him as a national leader of opposition to the administration.
Right off, that may seem an absurd proposition. Dayton doesn't create tingles of excitement -- except among Republicans eager to run against him. He has jarring syntax (it's more powerful to read a Dayton speech than to hear one). And he grades low on 'schmoozability' scales." Source: Star Tribune, January 27, 2005
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home