COLEEN ROWLEY'S ANNOUNCEMENT SPEECH PROVES ROVE WAS RIGHT
This is from Rowley's announcement speech:
"AG Ashcroft’s decision to seek the death penalty for Moussaoui also set a 'no holds barred' tone. But such draconian charges were accompanied by a significant cost to law enforcement and the effort to prevent further acts of terrorism. It made it impossible to attempt to interrogate and seek the suspect’s cooperation, something that would otherwise be standard operating procedure and which proved successful in most other terrorist cases – for example the 1993 WTC bombing, the African embassy bombings and the case against the millennium Al Qaeda terrorist Ahmed Ressam."
and
"I will do everything in my power to get our country back on a judicious course of action with domestic investigations of international terrorism."
I am appalled Rowley called the investigations into the 1993 WTC bombing, the African embassy bombings and the case against the millennium Al Qaeda terrorist Ahmed Ressam "successful."
Instead of defeating terrorists, Rowley would seek their "cooperation" in investigations.
It's clear Rowley believes terrorism is a criminal act rather than an act of war.
Rowley's approach to terrorism would make America less safe.
"AG Ashcroft’s decision to seek the death penalty for Moussaoui also set a 'no holds barred' tone. But such draconian charges were accompanied by a significant cost to law enforcement and the effort to prevent further acts of terrorism. It made it impossible to attempt to interrogate and seek the suspect’s cooperation, something that would otherwise be standard operating procedure and which proved successful in most other terrorist cases – for example the 1993 WTC bombing, the African embassy bombings and the case against the millennium Al Qaeda terrorist Ahmed Ressam."
and
"I will do everything in my power to get our country back on a judicious course of action with domestic investigations of international terrorism."
I am appalled Rowley called the investigations into the 1993 WTC bombing, the African embassy bombings and the case against the millennium Al Qaeda terrorist Ahmed Ressam "successful."
Instead of defeating terrorists, Rowley would seek their "cooperation" in investigations.
It's clear Rowley believes terrorism is a criminal act rather than an act of war.
Rowley's approach to terrorism would make America less safe.
2 Comments:
If terrorism is an act of war, with whom do we fight a war? One cannot fight a war against individuals, only sovereign nations.
War(n):
A state of open, armed, often prolonged conflict carried on between nations, states, or parties.
Do you really believe we can't fight a war with Al Qaeda and/or terrorists?
Post a Comment
<< Home