RUT ROW RATTY!
Please click on the picture above to view Halle Wetterling's email
I think it may be time to evaulate the strength of your candidacy when you decide to send out a campaign email signed by your dog.Bonus Question: Do you know where I got my idea for the title?
7 Comments:
ZOINKS, MDE! Maybe Halle was paid off in Scooby Snacks!
The family of Charles Schulz should investigate copyright infringement by Wetterling on her dog house illustration...
Funny! I asked my dog (mini-me) if he would vote for Patty after receiving Halle's email, but he's still supporting Ford Bell. He told me a veterinary doctor is way more credible in a doggie bow wow way.
Hey got to run, minne-me wants to go vote for Chris Coleman!
You know...Lena is right! I just went to www.snoppy.com, and the dog house is an exact copy of snoppy's dog house.
Stop it you two. Republicans are supposed to be against frivolous lawsuits.
Seriously, the dog just sent a fundraising letter. It's not like he wrote an entire book about living in the white house.
http://www.travelingdogs.com/milliebush
First of all…I never suggested a lawsuit.
Secondly, I’m not sure I would say that a lawsuit for copyright infringement is frivolous. The using of a copyrighted item (and I don’t know even if Snoppy’s doghouse IS copyrighted) would be a form of stealing. IF it was copyrighted, and IF Patty refused to retract and apologize for using the Snoopy dog house, THEN a lawsuit MIGHT be warranted.
Suing a tobacco company because you got cancer from smoking even though you knew the risks; suing a homeowner for shooting a bugler that was breaking in for the purpose of stealing; or suing Mc Donald’s for making you fat are frivolous lawsuits.
Nor did I. I said INVESTIGATE. As an artist myself, image theft is prevalent (especially on the web). She should know better.
Post a Comment
<< Home