INSIDE MINNESOTA "DFL" POLITICS
If anyone still thinks Inside Minnesota Politics is fair and balanced, just read the titles of their latest podcasts:
Bush takes shot at Pawlenty
Wetterling's Promise Won't Haunt Her
Rep. Kline's Anger Will Backfire
BTW: John Kline is a Congressman, not a Senator.
"'Compassionate Conservatism' is apparently not 'Polite Conservatism'. Listen as Peter explains how Senator John Kline's refusal to accept an apology may ultimately backfire since it highlights Kline's apparent refusal to financially support the troops." Source: Inside Minnesota Politics, February 7, 2006
Bush takes shot at Pawlenty
Wetterling's Promise Won't Haunt Her
Rep. Kline's Anger Will Backfire
BTW: John Kline is a Congressman, not a Senator.
"'Compassionate Conservatism' is apparently not 'Polite Conservatism'. Listen as Peter explains how Senator John Kline's refusal to accept an apology may ultimately backfire since it highlights Kline's apparent refusal to financially support the troops." Source: Inside Minnesota Politics, February 7, 2006




7 Comments:
Michael,
Thanks for the correction. As evidenced from one of the headlines we're well aware that John Kline is a Representative and the rest of the copy has been corrected to conform.
And for YOUR post to be accurate you'll need to note that what you posted are NOT the titles of our latest podcasts but the headlines from our latest podcast (singular).
You obviously wouldn't have made that error if you had actually listened to the show.
If you listen to the show and find any errors, or have any complaints please email us.
The DFL feels about whoever is leaking to you and the 40th district chair the way the GOP feels about Andy Aplikowski's blog and how that blog generated a City Pages story about Tony Sutton.
I understand that Michael McIntee from Inside Minnesota Politics tried to post a response - and you wouldn't post it. What are you afraid of?
Are you kidding me? The post is above your comment. I am sent an email from Blogger everytime someone leaves a comment.
I published Mr. McIntee's comment. After reading you post Eva, looks like you got ahead of yourself.
Before I posted that post, I checked this post and verified that McIntee's post never got posted. I didn't get a screen shot, but both Michael and I noticed this. It's good that in response to my post, you liberated Michael's post.
Just wanted to say it here...
the imps at IMP are the most biased hacks who lie to the public intentionally by masquerading as "unbiased".
I think we will have to do another dissection of one of their podcasts in the near future.
And, Michael, we are going to use sound from your podcasts again using the Fair Use defense again, which our lawyers said we fell within AGAIN.
Why do I do this? Because you are intentionally trying to mislead your listenership...and the truth will overcome.
I listened to their broadcast...it sounds like we will have to do another expose show on their lies and hypocrisy.
Mike, you and your co-hack are welcome to attempt to defend yourselves. You have the contact information.
Post a Comment
<< Home