« ELLISON DEFENDED JACKSON AND ATTACKED MIAR | Home | HOW LONG WAS ELLISON IN THE NATION OF ISLAM? »
ELLISON SPEAKS AT RALLY THAT ADVOCATED VIOLENCE AGAINST POLICE
By Michael B. Brodkorb | June 5, 2006
"At a rally in 1992, [Keith] Ellison claimed, 'Black people do not live under a democracy. You don't have an obligation to obey a government that considers you to be less than human.' He was joined in the rally by Spike Moss, who threatened the attendees, 'If there is one uniform sticking it to a black man and there are six of you seeing that uniform stick it to him, bring it to him. If I find out your name, and you didn't bring it to him, I'll bring it to you.'" Source: Star Tribune, May 1, 1992
Tags: Keith Ellison
Topics: Keith Ellison | 17 Comments »
17 Responses to “ELLISON SPEAKS AT RALLY THAT ADVOCATED VIOLENCE AGAINST POLICE”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
June 5th, 2006 at 10:50 AM
What now? Is Spike Moss really Keith Ellison?
I have a hard time keeping up with all your paranoid theories about how the scary black muslim men are out to get you.
June 5th, 2006 at 12:37 PM
Karl shows the hipocrisy between Democrats and Republicans. Trent Lott said something at Strom Thurmond’s 100th birthday party which was interpreted by some as being insensitive to African-Americans and he was shown the door. Keith Ellison surrounds himself with racists and hatemongers and what is the Democrats’ response? Just more excuses.
June 5th, 2006 at 12:58 PM
Chris, here’s the difference: Trent Lott said within the past few years that the U.S. would be better off had we elected a segregationist.
On the other hand, Ellison hung around with some bad people over ten years ago, people that he has since repudiated.
Find some examples of Ellison engaged in questionable behavior in this decade and you might have a point.
June 5th, 2006 at 1:03 PM
If associating with those who espouse hatred, bigotry, homophobia and racism were to result in instant removal from office, the political system would grind to a halt, and the Republican party would cease to exist.
June 5th, 2006 at 1:40 PM
Bob,
No, there’s even more of a difference. Ellison did more than just hang around with questionable people, he HIMSELF advocated racial segregation/separatism as a means for redress of racial grievances. This is much more substantial than merely heaping some empty (but admittedly stupid and insensitive) praise on a 100 year old Strom Thurmond as Lott had done, wouldn’t you say?
June 5th, 2006 at 1:59 PM
Karl, are you saying that the 51% of the people who voted Republican in the last election are all racists? That’s a lot of millions of people who you’ve judged.
Serious question. Do you personally know any Republicans? You’ve attacked me, my parents and entire family, many of my friends.
I know a lot of Democrats and would never say things like all Democrats are anti-Christian bigots as I know that is not true.
You really need some diversity training.
June 5th, 2006 at 2:46 PM
Say Mike,why don’t all you guys cool it toward
Mr.Hakim er.. I mean…Ellison! Even though today’s story in the Strib appeared to be positive,the way it started on page 1 wasn’t !!!
It’s going to be great fun watching the STRIB try
to cut down Ellison,Reichgott and Ostrow to try
and get a plurality for Erlandson! Don’t let them
use YOU and other bloggers to do the dirty work
these politically correct and GUTLESS liberals
refuse to do themselves !!!
June 5th, 2006 at 3:56 PM
I thought of that JimJ. Look how the media went after Dean when they thought he’d be a weaker candidate then Kerry. I remember listening to the news/commentary on liberal KFAI and I actually agreed with them (they being Deaniacs). The establishment is going to push for Ellison.
June 5th, 2006 at 5:49 PM
Wow, it seems that MDE sure cares a lot about what some Democrats used to believe 15 or 20 years ago. Funny that the focus isn’t on what has been happening lately…
June 5th, 2006 at 5:58 PM
I judge Republicans like Michael judges Democrats. Assume the worst, write even worse than that, and never strive for the truth.
I know some GREAT republicans, but, since the tone of this site is attack rather than inform, their existence is not essential.
June 5th, 2006 at 7:21 PM
Well, since Dems care about holding public officials accountable for their racist statements and associations to racist groups only when the official has an (R) by his or her name, I guess that leaves the job to MDE and others.
June 5th, 2006 at 7:40 PM
I love watching democrats defend this obviously white-hating, extremist leftist just because he’s one of their own. They’ve vote for Mao if he were the DFL-endorsed candicate just because “he’s their guy”. This is so telling about democrats.
June 5th, 2006 at 8:20 PM
Does it even matter that Ellison has seperated himself from that stuff- BEFORE he went to elected office. His history of working with other communities is longer than him standing around on some stage with a bunch of nuts.
Should I go through the list of national AND local Republicans who have demosrated infidelity, racist speech, criminal sexual misconduct, malfeasance and misfeasence? All within the last six years, all elected in office.
Here in Minnesota there is no group close to the activities of Republicans. Cheating on income taxes, forced apologies for racially aimed statements, criminal sexual misconduct, stealing, cheating on wives while preacing ‘family values’, cheating and lying on campaign finance reports, lying on affidavits for office.
All within the last three years in our own legislature and the Republican Party Structure.
Bring it on.
June 5th, 2006 at 9:17 PM
How more would you have Ellison held accountable. He has answered all of these questions in an open letter to anyone who will read it. Would you have him persoanlly go door to door around the state apologizing?
I mean, you took your shot. Keith countered with a smart and effective response, and now you all are again stuck in neutral wishing he hadn’t done that so you would still have something to complain about.
If I were you, I would start rehearsing this phrase: Congressman Keith Ellison. Because you will be forced to bitch about it for the next 30 years.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:39 AM
I was at the capitol this year when Michele Bachmann spoke out in favor of banning gay marriage.
While I completley disagree, I was there to hear it, so, does that mean I now also have to be a supporter of her cause?
June 6th, 2006 at 10:43 AM
Bob-
You said that Trent Lott praised a segregationist more recently than Ellison hang around with racists. However, Strom Thurmond did not hold segregationist views for that last several decades of his political career. In fact, Strom was the first Southern Senator to hire African-Americans to work in his Senate staff. If you want to talk about real racism, let’s look at the former Senate Majority Leader and former President Pro Tempore of the Senate Robert Byrd. Byrd, as recently as a few years ago, used the “N” word in a TV news interview. Again, Democrats show how they live under different rules than everyone else does.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:41 AM
“Criminal sexual misconduct, stealing, cheating on wives while preacing ‘family values’, cheating and lying on campaign finance reports, lying on affidavits for office.”
Let’s maintain our focus — we’re talking about Keith Ellison, not Bill Clinton.