« SENIOR ROWLEY STAFFER CAUGHT IN DIRTY TRICK; DOUBLE-AGENT PLOT EXPOSED BY KLINE CAMPAIGN | Home | SENIOR ROWLEY STAFFER CAUGHT IN DIRTY TRICK; DOUBLE-AGENT PLOT EXPOSED BY KLINE CAMPAIGN #2 »
NEW RNC VIDEO: DEMOCRATS: WEAK AND WRONG
By Michael B. Brodkorb | August 9, 2006
Click on the picture to view the RNC video "Meet the Defeat-ocrats"
Tags: Uncategorized
Topics: Uncategorized | 25 Comments »
25 Responses to “NEW RNC VIDEO: DEMOCRATS: WEAK AND WRONG”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
August 9th, 2006 at 2:36 PM
This should band together the 20 percent of Americans who think George Bush is doing a good job into a solid voting block this fall. Unfortunatley, that still leaves you 31 percent short of victory.
August 9th, 2006 at 2:41 PM
Good timing here. Goes right along with the proof yesterday in Conneticut that the Democratic Party has been hijacked by the loony left.
August 9th, 2006 at 2:46 PM
I think something is wrong with the video, after Kennedy it just goes dark. Perhaps an effective artistic point, but probably not what they were planning…
August 9th, 2006 at 3:22 PM
Joe Lieberman has been a reliably Liberal United States Senator; he was the Democrat’s candidate for VP and a contender for the Presidential nomination.
The fact that he was defeated by an extremist within his own party simply because he is unwilling to roll out the white flag and surrender in the War on Terror is very telling.
And you know what? Given the cast of clowns put up by the DFL this year, Lieberman’s loss has a distinctly local feel to it.
Yesterday’s Connecticut Democrat primary is all too similar to the likes of the extremists such as Ellison, Klobuchar and Rowley that the DFL has nominated in Minnesota this cycle.
It is refreshing to see the release of this Web video because despite the Left’s head-in-the-sand, retreat and surrender mentality, these are serious times and we are still fighting a Global War on Terror.
The Connecticut results, candidates here like Ellison, Klobuchar and Rowley, and Democrat extremists controlling the party everywhere make the party unfit to lead during times like this.
August 9th, 2006 at 3:32 PM
Probably another loony left hack job.
LOL
August 9th, 2006 at 3:47 PM
unfit to lead?
How has this current leadership done?
65% of Americans beleive we’re going in the wrong direction. Since the President and every member of Congres was elected with more than 35% of the vote, doesn’t seem very logical to blame this all on the left or to ignore the numbers.
The current leadership is corrupt, wrong and unpopular.
Ellison and Klobuchar will be good voices in Washington to join with the new majorities.
August 9th, 2006 at 4:05 PM
You know what? Randy Kelley was a consistent voice for the DFL for many years. But he made the same mistake Lieberman did, and he also got bounced.
Blaming it on the loony fringe is nice, but you have to remember that the loony fringe in both cases was more than 51 percent of the electorate, making it far from fringe territory.
Lieberman proved that Randy Kelly was not an anomoly. I am getting excited for Nov. 7.
August 9th, 2006 at 4:05 PM
//Ellison and Klobuchar will be good voices in Washington to join with the new majorities. //
Yes, my friends, they really do think this.
August 9th, 2006 at 4:10 PM
Roving Reporter, 35% of the country thinks that 9/11 was an inside job. Eighty percent of Muslims don’t believe the State of Israel has the right to exist. I guess you think that those polls are worthy too since you like polls so much.
I love how the Democrat party has turned into McGovern Dean, McGovern Kerry, McGovern Lamont, McGovern Murtha and McGovern Moore.
I am looking forward to Nov. 7 when the McGovernites are thrown on their asses by the American people.
August 9th, 2006 at 4:21 PM
Bush should “lead” how Slick Willie lead.
“Dick Morris. Come into my office, I need to make a decision. Will you tell me what the polling says so I know what to do?”
I’d rather have Bush in office at 35% approval but doing what he feels is best, then Clinton in there with 48% approval and doing what the polling tells him will make him look good that day.
August 9th, 2006 at 4:24 PM
Roving. What do you think about Michael Moores letter he wrote to Dems today? The one threatening any Dems not towing the far left line. The one threatening Hillary.
I’ll be in NYC for a brief time this fall. Fortunately it’s before the election. If the Dems win, I’m staying away from any likely terrorist targets.
August 9th, 2006 at 4:33 PM
What new majorities?
You’ve got one democrat who won a democratic primary over another democrat, and now all the lefties have got their panties all wet.
This is funny. It’s going to be even funnier in November when Leiberman wins as an Independent.
August 9th, 2006 at 4:42 PM
Don’t forget that a lot of those unhappy with Bush are conservatives. I for one think he is wayyyyy to liberal on domestic policy. But are we going to vote for the party of Michael Moore and MoveOn.org?
Most conservatives will hold their noses and vote for the big government Republican over a Democrat who thinks we aren’t at war with Islmo-Facists.
August 9th, 2006 at 5:04 PM
Good point.
The Lieberman defeat only strengthens the belief that Democrats are weak on national security.
Can we trust the Party of Michael Moore with our National Security?
August 9th, 2006 at 6:38 PM
Last time I checked, the voters of Conecticut were not participating in a poll. It was an election. Same with the voters of St. Paul.
If you want to believe that these are simply anomolies and not indicitive of public sentiment going into the fall, I encourage you to keep beating the warmonger drums. Tell the people that the democrats are wrong on the war, and that we need to stay over there forever. I dare you.
August 9th, 2006 at 8:07 PM
Lieberman losing is indication of how radicalized the Democrats have become. You are the party of McGovern who wanted to cut and run in 1972 and you are the same party today. I predict that just as in 1972, the Democrats will lose in November.
August 9th, 2006 at 8:08 PM
Chris: // I am looking forward to Nov. 7 when the McGovernites are thrown on their asses by the American people. //
I’m looking forward to Nov 7, when we hear just how much Chris likes crow, with a side of humble pie.
August 9th, 2006 at 8:26 PM
RR: // Tell the people that the democrats are wrong on the war, and that we need to stay over there forever. I dare you. //
Yes… please… oh, and use the word “Islamo-fascist” in every sentence you can.
// “Islamofascism is nothing but an empty propaganda term. And wartime propaganda is usually, if not always, crafted to produce hysteria, the destruction of any sense of proportion. Such words, undefined and unmeasured, are used by people more interested in making us lose our heads than in keeping their own.”[4] —Joseph Sobran, syndicated columnist. //
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamofascism
That reminds people just how fascist it is not to have private phone and email any more.
// Bruce Fein, former general counsel to the FCC in the Reagan administration (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on NSA and domestic spying, 2/28/06)
“The theory invoked by the president to justify eavesdropping by the NSA in contradiction to FISA would equally justify mail-openings, burglaries, torture, or internment camps – all in the name of gathering foreign intelligence. Unless rebuked, it will lie around like a loaded weapon, ready to be used by an incumbent who claims an urgent need.†//
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/24106leg20060208.html
And rhymes. We need more rhymes.
// We don’t want to fight
But, by Jingo, if we do,
We’ve got the ships,
We’ve got the men,
We’ve got the money, too. //
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jingoism
August 9th, 2006 at 8:32 PM
You mean like the crow you ate after your bogus complaint was thrown out? That’s gotta be humble pie getting ripped in the Star Tribune.
August 9th, 2006 at 8:33 PM
Chris “cut and run in 1972″ ? Isn’t that what Nixon ended up doing? What, we should have increased our forces in South Vietnam and continued the war. Is that what you are saying?
August 9th, 2006 at 9:08 PM
Yeah, Chris, I seem to remember 14 months later, a corrupt Republican President and his loyalists getting caught pissing on the Constitution. I remember Democrats gaining a hige majority in both houses and state legislatures across the country (Phyllis Kahn was swept into office that year).
You damn right I’m hoping this is like 1972. Democrats won more seats in the House, Senate, Governorships and state legislatures. Bush- I mean Nixon was great for us.
Dick Morris is a republican consultant. He has been a mainstay on Fox News Network for a decade. He wrote books lying about Bill and Hillary. Clinton was one of few Dems he worked for. Zell Miller was the other.
Seems like you’re eating your own here.
August 9th, 2006 at 9:27 PM
If the CT Senate Primary was a referendum on the Iraq War, then you libs better pick a different issue because almost half of your own party in a dark blue state did not believe Lieberman should be ousted because he voted for the war.
Go ahead and conduct your purge and enjoy it now, because come fall, Lamont and the other kook Leftist candidates you support will fizzle out just like your party chair, Dean, did in 2004.
August 9th, 2006 at 9:50 PM
Nice try fellas. Your Brian Hanna, who seems pretty typical of the new radical left who has taken over the Democrat Party, doesn’t even acknowledge that terrorism exists. He reads what idiots post on wikipedia instead of actually listening to what the terrorists are saying. The President of Iran wants to bring on Armageddon and the return of the Maji who, according to Islamic faith, will smite anyone who is not a Muslim and will give the Muslims 72 palaces with 72 bedrooms and 72 virgins.
McGovern lost his ass in 1972 because the American people rejected the radical anti-war feelings. You people will lose again. Our securtiy is at stake.
August 9th, 2006 at 10:19 PM
60 percent of Americans disagree with the president on Iraq. Dems sent a message to Republicans yesterday:
The president, and the Republican Party, misled the American people.
November will be bad for Republicans. ’08 will be worse.
August 10th, 2006 at 9:22 AM
No, the moonbats who dominate the Democratic Party sent a message to the electorate at large, which is anyone who disagrees with them will be purged from their party.