Comments on: MDE EXCLUSIVE: DID DENISE DITTRICH FAIL TO DISCLOSE CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

By: Fact Check: MDE Wrongfully Attacks Rep. Dittrich at MNpublius.com

Fact Check: MDE Wrongfully Attacks Rep. Dittrich at MNpublius.com — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:03:17 +0000

[...] Michael Brodkorb has once again left truth and reason far behind in his endless pursuit of self-aggrandizement. Who’s the victim this time? Representative Denise Dittrich (HD 47A) from Champlain. [...]

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:59:24 +0000

Denise Dittrich was recently cleared of all wrongdoing.

By: jimj

jimj — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:07:55 +0000

The usual STUPID and TOTALLY PARTISAN reply by
Roving “STRIB” Bigot !

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:28:50 +0000

Brian, You mean slander like filing bogus charges against Sen. Ortmann?

Roving, once again your legal opinion is bullshit. Nice try though.

By: Minnesota Democrats Exposed Â© » MDE EXCLUSIVE: DID DENISE DITTRICH FAIL TO DISCLOSE CONFLICT OF INTEREST? #2

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:18:48 +0000

[...] In the short history of Minnesota Democrats Exposed, I have not spent much time writing posts exposing legislators. But as I promised, this information is too good to pass up. [...]

By: Roving Reporter

Roving Reporter — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:06:04 +0000

If Michael had something, he would post it. With legal action already suggested, he is to cowardly to post it now. I bet this one disappears like so many teased topics before.

What is the point of selling the sizzle if you don’t have the steak?

By: EvilDemocratz

EvilDemocratz — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:47:50 +0000

“Facts donâ€™t matter. Itâ€™s the buzz that counts! Keep making enough buzz about slander, and hope something sticks!”

A post that describes perfectly what DFL’ers do during every election cycle.

By: NewDFLer

NewDFLer — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:44:22 +0000

“Green party paging Mr. Hanna. Mr. Hanna to the Green Party, please.”

By: Dwight

Dwight — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:30:08 +0000

“Check back tonight for more details!”

“Check back tomorrow morning for the scoop!”

“Help Michael build his traffic numbers so he can charge more for ads!”

By: Brian Hanna

Brian Hanna — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:36:26 +0000

Facts don’t matter. It’s the buzz that counts! Keep making enough buzz about slander, and hope something sticks!

By: wtm

wtm — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:22:13 +0000

Uh, I assume the conflict of interest is beyond merely voting in a manner consistent with a campaign pledge. I also assume the conflict of interest will be revealed tomorrow. Hence the “check back tomorrow” teaser.

By: Newt Jr.

Newt Jr. — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:21:20 +0000

Clearly Dittich must own some land upon which some aspect of this obscene pork barrel boondoggle will be built.

The PorkStar Rail Line is Minnesota’s equivalent to Boston’s Big Dig.

By: James

James — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:52:29 +0000

Roving buddy, I love you, but the point is that MB is teasing tomorrow’s story. Nothing here was the real scoop, nor was it intended to be.

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:58:28 +0000

Nice threat MN Politics. Is that the best you have to offer?

By: Roving Reporter

Roving Reporter — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:29:54 +0000

So, let me get this right. She campaigns as a pro-Northstar candidate, wins, and then is expected to stay away from the issue because she campaigned as a supporter?

This may be hard for you to understand, but sometimes when people campaign, they do so on issues they actually intend to work on. Where, exactly, is the conflict there?

By: MN Politics Guru

MN Politics Guru — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:27:34 +0000

I hope you have all of your ducks in a row on this one. It would be a tragedy if, say, an attorney or other expert had looked over this alleged conflict of interest and found it wanting.

Just sayin’.