« MN GOP CALLS ON KLOBUCHAR TO COME CLEAN OVER HER INCOMPLETE & INACCURATE FEC REPORT | Home | MDE EXCLUSIVE: WALZ JAILED FOR DUI AFTER DRIVING 96 IN 55 MPH ZONE »
MDE EXCLUSIVE: REQUEST FOR RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST ELLISON FILED IN HENNEPIN COUNTY; HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 23
By Michael B. Brodkorb | September 6, 2006
A request for a restraining order was filed in Hennepin County today against Keith Ellison, the DFL endorsed candidate in the 5th CD. The judge has scheduled a hearing for October 23, 2006.
The allegations in this document are very serious and the judge could have dismissed the petition, but didn't.
There are two-sides to every story and I will provide Ellison's campaign the opportunity to respond. Please check back to Minnesota Democrats Exposed for more information on this developing story.
Tags: Uncategorized
Topics: Uncategorized | 68 Comments »
68 Responses to “MDE EXCLUSIVE: REQUEST FOR RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST ELLISON FILED IN HENNEPIN COUNTY; HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 23”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
September 5th, 2006 at 6:34 PM
Wow.
September 5th, 2006 at 6:42 PM
Key words: “Previous significant romantic relationship.”
Acording to her, he called her a “bitch,” “lazy,” and referred to her mixed race in a racist way. He damaged her property and fought her in a physical manner.
All in front of her kid! He is toast.
September 5th, 2006 at 6:50 PM
I support Keith Ellison because I agree with him on the issues.
Keith supports getting us out of Iraq as soon as possible, real environmental reform, single-payer healthcare, getting “smart on crime”, fair trade, and a lasting, fair peace in the Middle East.
It is clear that these priorities are not those of the current crowd in Washington, and we need fresh players to revitalize the national debate.
Keith brings a unique perspective, that of an progressive American Muslim, to Congress.
Keith is a human being and is not perfect. MB/MDE and his Echomen will continue to bring up dirt as we approach the primary and the election.
Keith Ellison is the best candidate for the 5th CD seat, he is right on the issues, and I fully support his candidacy.
September 5th, 2006 at 7:28 PM
How can this be?
Br. Keith Hakim-Mohammed Ellison just proudly proclaimed that all of his problems are behind him.
September 5th, 2006 at 8:03 PM
Wow– this sure does sound like the woman who Keith has a restraining order against already.
And the timing!
Politically motivated?
Couldn’t possibly be.
Sean
September 5th, 2006 at 8:04 PM
Oh– and by the way Mike– where did that page you were supposed to put up clarifying who you worked for go?
Sean
September 5th, 2006 at 8:07 PM
Filed against him today…and you just happened to find it?
September 5th, 2006 at 8:13 PM
WOW WOW WOW
September 5th, 2006 at 8:26 PM
Brian,
I hope to God, you don’t have a daughter or a wife.
September 5th, 2006 at 8:53 PM
What are you talking about politically motivated, I am going to vote for Kieth in the primary, then the RNC will get off thier butts and actually fight for this seat instead of rolling over. If Kieth wins the Primary every womens group, and every group that fights for equality will be againisnt him, no way he wins this seat but I sure hope he does not give up!
September 5th, 2006 at 9:03 PM
Isn’t Ellison married?
No wonder he can’t find the time to pay his taxes, or his tickets & etc…dude’s got his busy on in a big way!
Oh, and if he is married…..isn’t there something in the Koran about adultry?
Maybe he’s still using the Farrakhan version….
September 5th, 2006 at 9:06 PM
Oh BTW, as to the timing; if you read the affidavit, the woman says the last incident was in August of this year…maybe she’s just finally had enough.
September 5th, 2006 at 9:13 PM
Brian, I think you would support the Devil if he were for single payer health care. Oh wait…
By the way, can you explain exactly how someone guilty of a number of petty (and perhaps not so petty but he has not had his day in court to be fair) crimes is going to “get smart on crime”? Is it that if Ellison is elected to Congress and lives in Washington, Minneapolis’ crime rate will go down because he’s not in the city any more?
And how does a Congressman fight crime? Isn’t that the job of the Mayor and City of Minneapolis??? If they can’t fight crime without Washington, D.C. Minneapolis is in a worse state of affairs than even I thought.
September 5th, 2006 at 9:21 PM
What a shock. Your first effort at using the mental illness of this woman backfired, so now you have managed to use her sickness to convince her that she is somehow in danger from a guy who months ago took out a restraining order AGAINST her.
I bet if you had been alive in the 1950′s, you would have volunteered to be Andy Knutson’s ghost writer for the Coya Come Home letter.
September 5th, 2006 at 9:39 PM
What a shock…Raving Reporter calling the alleged victim names. Is this how compassionate Democrats are toward women?
Assuming the assault was reported to Minneapolis police (and I believe that Michael had documents that it was) I wonder if it counted as one of the assults in Minneapolis’ crime statistics for that year?
September 5th, 2006 at 9:40 PM
By the way, Raving, even Mentally ill people can be assaulted. Just because a person has a mental illness, doesn’t make them less human than anyone else.
September 5th, 2006 at 9:46 PM
I don’t see what anyone could be upset with MDE about here. He’s simply reporting that the document was filed. He’s not jumping to any conclusions or making any assertions. Nothing in his post is not 100 percent fact.
But it’s funny to watch you try.
September 5th, 2006 at 10:00 PM
Roving Reporter or whoever you are. I think you are a terrible democrat, a lousy citizen, and a horrific human being. I hope we never uncover who you are because I don’t ever want to know you. I don’t want to know that people like you exist in America.
September 5th, 2006 at 10:48 PM
What would Ellison have to do, Hanna and Roving, for you to take a step back and say “maybe with this crop of candidates we could do a little better for our team?”
I want to see you two mindless fools actually write that the DFL is best represented at this point in history with Keith Ellison carrying the banner.
Then tell all of us specifically why Erlandson and Ember and Ostrow just don’t match up. Where do they fall short in your preprogrammed minds?
As a Republican, I cheer that you put up Ellison next week for the signal it will give as to the state of today’s DFL to the rest of Minnesota.
As a concerned citizen, I fear that you put up Ellison next week for the signal it will give everyone as to type of fringe, tainted candidate a supposed “major party” is willing to nominate.
What a truly sad commentary that would be.
And as much as Raving and the loony Left would love for people to believe. It has nothing at all to do with race or religion.
September 5th, 2006 at 10:50 PM
Meredith, do not ever address me again.
September 5th, 2006 at 10:55 PM
Brodkorb pwned:
http://www.mnpublius.com/2006/09/mde_continues_to_distort_the_t.php
Nice try, Mike.
September 5th, 2006 at 10:57 PM
“What a shock…Raving Reporter calling the alleged victim names. Is this how compassionate Democrats are toward women?”
Ask Juanita Broaddrick. Oh wait, Democrats don’t like to talk about that. Well, I guess it’s okay to be a rapist as long as you are pro-abortion.
September 5th, 2006 at 11:02 PM
I support Keith Ellison because I agree with him on the issues.
There’s a shock. A democrat supporting a democrat because of the issues, not because of their character.
The next headline: “Ellison convicted of mass murder, refuses to withdraw from race”.
Brian and Roving: “I support Keith Ellison because I agree with him on the issues.”
The Democratic Party has completely lost it’s way if they don’t dump this guy.
September 5th, 2006 at 11:08 PM
Poor Dave Collings.
It is almost as though he chooses his employers through orange jumpsuit colored glasses.
Entenza and now Ellison for this poor guy.
Maybe in 2008 Collings will get the opportunity to run the Pat Forcia for US Senate endorsement battle. I bet Roving Reporter and Hanna will be the first to sign up.
Maybe Forcia will sign their names for them.
September 5th, 2006 at 11:13 PM
Let’s all be fair here.
Yeah, it’s news. He’s running for national office. MDE is right to put it up. He’s especially right, though, to include the actual resulting Order, because this tells the whole story. He could have just posted about the Petition.
It’s a denial. The judge ruled that the Petitioner failed to show that KE was a danger to her. She didn’t prove her case at the initial hearing.
As a matter of course, the judge is going to let her try to prove it, at a later, contested hearing. (It’s a much safer way to proceed than a dismissal.)
Look at what’s ordered: KE should stay away from her. In the DA hearings I’ve worked, that’s the gimme order. (As in, “so, Mr. Smith, if I order you to stay away from her, we can all go home. What say you?” “Great, your honor! The LAST thing in the world I want to do is be anywhere near that b*#!*^!”)
September 5th, 2006 at 11:23 PM
I totally agree that the mentally ill can be assaulted. But this particular woman has a history of bizarre actions against a number of prominent people. Actions so bizarre that Keith was forced to get a restraining order to protect himself from her. The MSM has described Michael’s previous attempt to make hay of the 911 report as “unfounded” and I am certain they will do the same with this.
I truly don’t understand why Ostrow’s campaign manager gets fired for spreading these lies, and yet Republicans seem to love Michael’s willingness to be the lowest common denomenator in the already deplorably low political arena.
September 5th, 2006 at 11:23 PM
So am I the only one to follow the link to the actual petition? It says, “There is no immediate and present danger to justify relief temporary relief.” Yes, there is a hearing scheduled, but it sounds like more of an appeal.
BTW, I predicted this one as well from MDE, but you are two days earlier than I thought. Please keep up the baseless smears. I am practicing my time accuracy in predicting them.
September 6th, 2006 at 12:12 AM
Looks like Keith will be “million man frog-marched” out of this race. And rightly so. Today, the Strib has chosen to endorse Erlandson.
September 6th, 2006 at 1:47 AM
Broodkorb is simply a contemporary variation on the KKK. This website is correspondingly propoganda in the tradition of DW Griffith’s Birth of a Nation. Broodkorb and his crowd are absolutely desparate to stop a Black man with an strong and independent political identity from getting into a position of power, and accordingly will publish any trash possible to smear Ellison.
September 6th, 2006 at 5:46 AM
If the request for an immediate restraining order was denied then presumably this woman is no longer in danger. Also why did she wait a year before petitioning? It would seem to me that if Keith’s “friend/attorney” was harassing her as she claimed she would have filed sooner (maybe in May 2005). Given the Date that this appeared and the fact that she is no longer being bothered I have to say that this looks like it has more to do with Keith’s election bid than with any alleged abuse.
Also if it is the same woman as the 911 incident, then isn’t their a pattern of fabricated reports, which in the 911 incident she tried to withdraw? im just saying…
September 6th, 2006 at 7:44 AM
Ellison has met the enemy and it is him. THe only question is will he go away quietly next Tuesday, or will he go down in flames on CSPAN-2 during his first term via some national embarassment.
September 6th, 2006 at 7:50 AM
Idiot: Broodkorb and his crowd are absolutely desparate to stop a Black man with an strong and independent political identity from getting into a position of power, and accordingly will publish any trash possible to smear Ellison.
MDE: There are two-sides to every story and I will provide Ellison’s campaign the opportunity to respond.
Firstly, Idiot can’t spell.
Secondly, is the publication of an actual document now called a “smear” and “trash” by DFL’ers? We’ll have to remember that the next time a Republican has issues that end up with court documents. We’ll have to call it a smear and trash simply for the publication of those documents. (Or they’ll have to admit to their usual double standard).
Thirdly, did the KKK actually offer their opponents the right to post their side of the story? I don’t think so.
What sounds “desparate” is Democrats willing to support a Con Man who clearly – CLEARLY – to any thinking person is in trouble, IS trouble, and needs to think of his party over himself. Obviously, though, he is the most selfish of candidates.
September 6th, 2006 at 7:59 AM
Only people who really don’t care about people would support a married man who dates mentally handicapped woman. Then say they support him in public. No excuse will make this go away and no matter what happens, Ellison and the DFL will blame everyone else for the problems they created all by themselves.
September 6th, 2006 at 8:41 AM
Hanna, what if I address you?? Your comment made it sound like a threat. Just wanted to make it clear, I can be your huckleberry tough guy.
September 6th, 2006 at 8:47 AM
The best reason to not vote for or otherwise support Keith Ellison is because of his public policy stances. I watched an hour-long debate on TV last night, moderated by the Channel 5 crew.
Gossip and scandals aside, Keith Ellison represents a very small, fringe element of voters in the 5th district. He doesn’t deserve that seat.
September 6th, 2006 at 8:56 AM
Brian, don’t ever tell me what I can do or can’t do. Guess what, even as a woman in America, I can say what I want. You and Ellison seemed to have problem with women. Women are even allowed their day in court. Again with emphases, for what you have posted on here, I hope you don’t have a daughter or a wife.
September 6th, 2006 at 9:16 AM
“Broodkorb is simply a contemporary variation on the KKK.”
But he’s not a Democrat.
September 6th, 2006 at 9:29 AM
“Only people who really don’t care about people would support a married man who dates mentally handicapped woman.” What evidence do you have that Keith was dating this woman other than her own vague allegation that they had “a significant romantic relationship.” Do you believe everything you read? Do you assume whatever you want based on what you read.
“is the publication of an actual document now called a “smear†and “trash†by DFL’ers?” Yes, obviously, when the continued publication of documents that are vague and inconclusive are used specifically to suggest – either explicitly by commentary or implicitly by their mere continued publication – that the person has done wrong.
“did the KKK actually offer their opponents the right to post their side of the story?” This offer is meaningless. It is akin to asking someone to respond to the question, “when did you stop beating your wife.”
“Idiot” – impressive rightwing communication skills.
September 6th, 2006 at 10:11 AM
Here are some thoughts on last night’s televised 5th District debate….
1. If only Paul Ostrow had a chance of winning, I would probably support him. He’s the best candidate, surprisingly – the most honest, well-spoken, intelligent, no-b.s. candidate of the bunch. He came across as a real person who cares, not a phony-baloney. It’s a shame he doesn’t have more momentum – he would be the best Congressperson.
2. Ellison is pathetic, just pathetic. No surprise there, we already know that. But his whole manner was so arrogant and full of himself that I nearly tossed my cookies. He claims he has the most courage by supporting an immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Really, how much “courage” does it take to throw red meat like that to the Far Left base he’s already appealing to? What would take courage is if Ellison would take an unpopular political stance with that group – that is, if he said the right thing and stated that it would be dangerous for our troops and our country and the stability of the whole region if we pulled out right away. Which is true – and it’s completely irresponsible and politically opportunistic in the extreme to demand an immediate withdrawal. But no – Ellison’s actually the chicken here – he tells the Far Lefties what they want to hear and knows that will help him win the primary and then acts like he’s a martyr and calls that “courage”? Give me a huge break. Joe Lieberman had courage because he knew how unpopular the war is and, right or wrong, he stuck by it and was excommunicated by his own party for it. Love Joe or hate him, THAT is courage – advocating for foolish choices in foreign policy just because that is what voters want to hear is just plain cowardice.
3. The gaffes were funny. Ellison talked about when he was a “state legislature”. “Legislature”? Not “legislator”? I know this guy has a big ego, but, sheesh, he thinks he was the whole state legislature? (I’m kidding – I knew what he meant, but a person running for Congress ought to be able to make the important distinction between the two words.) Ellison also referred to the “GBLT” community, when in fact it’s the “GLBT” community – stands for gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgendered. “GBLT” would, to me, maybe stand for “Gay bacon lettuce and tomato.” No wonder Ember won the Lavender magazine endorsement over Ellison!
4. Mike Erlandson is a terrible candidate. I think he’s probably a good guy, but a terrible candidate. He kept looking all over the place when he talked, and it made him look “shifty.” He also pronounces Iraq “eye-rack”. Ugh. Dude, if you can’t pronounce it right, do you really think I’m going to vote you into the US Congress? Mike, get out of the race now. Despite the Strib endorsement, you are NOT going to win and you’re only helping to get this charlatan Ellison elected.
5. I’m voting for Ember because I think she’s a good person and good on all the issues I care about…but, honestly, she comes across really phony on TV. She sounds like the class president from high school delivering an over-enthusiastic book report to the student body. Too “peppy”. But, I will continue to support Ember, because I agree with her on the issues, believe she is trustworthy and has a good record to back that up, and I think she’ll make an excellent Congressperson and make the 5th District voters proud – rather than embarrassed by Ellison, who, if he gets to Congress, is going to embarrass our entire state.
6. Back to Ellison – the guy really amazes me. I mean, he’s slick, no doubt about it. Then again, you have to be slick to meet with Sam and Sylvia Kaplan and Frank Hornstein and the American Jewish World and somehow convince them you’re a friend to the Jews and Israel, and then turn around and appear at a fundraiser with Hamas supporter Nihad Awad. That takes a lot of slickness! And chutzpah! The bad kind. Ellison is a good talker. But beneath the veneer, I see a man who has never really grown up. He displays no real maturity and he comes across like a 6-year-old who has cookie crumbs on his face but swears he didn’t raid the cookie jar. Bottom line is that I don’t think Keith Ellison has ever come to terms with his “mistakes,” which involve not obeying the law and associating with hate groups. Mr. Ellison talks a good game, and is a good speaker and politician, but he talks out of both sides of his mouth and frankly I don’t think he can be trusted on anything he says. Well, I don’t just “think” that; his atrocious actions and record on that score speaks for themselves.
Ember clearly won the debate, despite her “over-peppiness”. Unless something changes between now and next Tuesday, I believe it’s Ember’s election to lose.
September 6th, 2006 at 10:53 AM
Brian,
You are pathetic and worthless to all of us here. Why don’t you go play solitaire and clip your toenails.
September 6th, 2006 at 11:35 AM
If this is the same woman that Ellison had the restraining order against why would Ellison and/or a “lawyer friend” keep contacting her until late August of this year? Just a guess but could it be an effort to keep the woman from making statements that might have negative impact on the Ellison campaign?
September 6th, 2006 at 12:01 PM
I guess the DFL’s P.R. Agency the STARTRIBUNE endorsed Erlandson (“Mr. Cadillac Escalade”) today . Just more evidence how out of touch this
FORMER newspaper is !
September 6th, 2006 at 1:04 PM
The FALLINGSTAR make great bird cage liners.
September 6th, 2006 at 1:05 PM
If the realtionship that is claimed upon the affidavit is true, it means that Ellison doesn’t take his marital vows any more seriously than he does Minnesota’s tax code, or motor vehicle codes, or campaign finance regulations…the world revolves around Keith.
But more importantly, if raving lunatic’s allegation that this woman s struggling with a mental disorder is true, one *really* has to question the decision making abilities of a guy who would choose to cheat on his wife with her.
Ellison is a piece of work..in other words, the perfect standard bearer for the Dem’s.
September 6th, 2006 at 1:23 PM
Of course, on the other hand “that woman’s nuts!” is pretty much a standard response from a guy who gets caught workin’ the side by his wife.
There’s a *whole* lot more to this story, and we’re confident the MDE will be keeping us filled in.
September 6th, 2006 at 1:42 PM
Don’t underestimate the power of a Strib endorsement for mainstream DFL primary voters. That plus SABO’s knighting Erlandson may push him over the top. Is there any word that Ostrow is going to throw his support to Erlandson?
September 6th, 2006 at 1:49 PM
Did anyone else notice that the hearing on October 23rd is scheduled to take place at the Hennepin County Government Center? Keith’s campaign manager better make sure he brings plenty of quarters to feed the meter.
September 6th, 2006 at 4:44 PM
I love all the play that this thing got in the MSM today. It was as missing as Alan Fine from every news source out there.
Nice swing, Casey. Care to swing again?
And, Meredith. You sound kinda hot.
September 6th, 2006 at 5:16 PM
Jordan,
Michael can’t be a member of the KKK, Robert Byrd (D-WV) wouldn’t let him in. He did mention something about white N-ers though. Is that what you were talking about when you were calling all of the Republicans racist, you moron?
People that look to throw shit at someone else better look in their own litter box first.
September 6th, 2006 at 5:58 PM
Brian Hanna,
You owe Meredith an apology. That’s no way to treat a Lady.
September 6th, 2006 at 6:13 PM
Andrew: // You are pathetic and worthless to all of us here //
I don’t post for you, or for the other hopelessly lost. I post for the moderates reading for substance.
Besides, I like listening for things I didn’t know – like CAIR’s bad apples, or Keith’s former opinions.
This is called getting an education by listening to people you don’t agree with. It’s called searching for perspective. It’s called hunting for the truth.
In exchange, I offer my liberal opinions for the consideration of moderates reading here.
Of course, the phrase “pearls before swine” is sometimes appropriate to the reaction I get from the Echomen.
September 6th, 2006 at 6:18 PM
Of all the posts I’ve read in this thread, I think Bobby_b’s had the most substance and was the fairest.
September 6th, 2006 at 6:20 PM
Thank you Dare2sayit.com as that is very chivalrous of you. And Raving Lunatic, oh I am hot alright. But sorry, I don’t like idiots.
September 6th, 2006 at 7:27 PM
Meredith-
I knew it. Nothing is hotter than a chick who can spew venemous filth rarely based in truth or logic.
Come on you minx. Tell me more about how George Bush is doing all the right things in Iraq…
September 6th, 2006 at 7:43 PM
Hi Meredith,
It just bothers me to see how people like Keith Ellison and Brian Hanna treat women. You would think that liberals wouldn’t behave that badly.
September 6th, 2006 at 10:21 PM
I can’t keep track of what sex or political party y’all are pretending to be from week to week…
And dare2sayit still won’t “dare to say” his name. In my little Republican town, you said any insults you had to say in person, to their face.
Hiding behind a pseudonym to sling your slander isn’t very brave, or very honorable. But it is just about par for what I’ve come to expect from the modern Republican Party.
Your slander of me is no more accurate than most of the slander here.
I suppose anonymous slander is about on par with starting a war, and not wanting to pay the taxes for it, so at least you are consistent.
September 6th, 2006 at 10:27 PM
Raving, you really are gutsy to lecture anyone about truth or logic. Your opinions have zero credibility. You defended Entenza spending $200 when we now know it was $40,000. You defended Brian Hanna’s bogus complaint against Sen. Ortman when we knew it would get thrown out. And those are just a couple of examples.
September 6th, 2006 at 11:44 PM
Dare2sayit-
Zip up and use your other brain.
Meredith questioned Brian’s suitability to be around women (post #9), and my suitability for life on the planet earth (post #18).
If we are not allowed to respond to such nonsense, please explain to me how the double standards here work, so I will not make such a silly mistake in the future.
September 7th, 2006 at 12:33 AM
Raving Pig,
You are filthy and indecent. I am sure no one in your world is ever impressed with you.
What proof do you have the woman requesting the restraining order against KE is mentally ill? No one here should believe it until you show us proof.
Is it just because you say so?
Or is it possible it is just part of your ongoing campaign to try to discredit anyone who tells the truth about dishonest democrats?
You claim she is mentally ill while you verbally abuse a woman on this site. You lack any credibility.
September 7th, 2006 at 7:12 AM
Raving Reporter was bad enough to cause me to stop reading these threads. But I couldn’t resist this one, and my payment for curiousity is an even bigger idiot named Brian “Hanna” Barabara. I would suggest eliminating their posts, especially that vapid “smiley” face that cartoon boy (or is he actually a “bubble” boy?) posts after his inane rants.
This is supposed to be a conservative viewpoint blog, yet these two consistently post rantings more at home on MN Publius or Daily Kos. Just delete them. If that isn’t possible, I would recommend ignoring them. Don’t respond to their drivel, and just like the little boys that they are, they will get bored and just shut up.
September 7th, 2006 at 7:44 AM
I knew it.
Finally he admits being an idiot.
September 7th, 2006 at 9:06 AM
September 7th, 2006 at 10:22 AM
Larry-
I won’t provide the woman’s name or proof of her mental staus to you because your side has proven repeatedly that they can not be trusted with information like this. I find it curious that since Jason Amundson lost his job, Michael has had no new information on Ellison.
Davey-
It kills me to be this wicked smart, and I certainly mean no offense by running logical and intellectual circles around you. If I were a slow-witted mouth-breather who gets easily confused by differing viewpoints, I would call for the elimination of all thoughts that were not my own. Hell, it works for George Bush.
September 7th, 2006 at 1:16 PM
“Slow-witted mouth-breather”?
That’s an INSULT? I think most people breathe out of their mouths at some point in their life – you know, like when you have a cold and your nose is really stuffed up.
Roving “Britt Robson” Reporter, you’re no Don Rickles! Don’t quit your City Pages day job – though, come to think of it, if you did, that would improve the overall level of journalism in this town by about 8,000 percent.
By the way, you’re just wicked…not wicked smart as you claim.
September 7th, 2006 at 1:52 PM
Miles-
While I am truly honored that you believe me to be Britt Robson, if we were playing Battleship, you would be hearing the Kerplunk sound right about now.
September 7th, 2006 at 6:50 PM
Raving,
Sorry to be so rude. I should have included you with Keith Ellison and Brian Hanna in the list of liberals who treat women like crap.
September 7th, 2006 at 10:45 PM
dare2sayit, 2 demerits for lying.
Now go clean your room, its a pigsty.
September 8th, 2006 at 12:34 AM
I treat women like crap? How so?
If accusing a woman with documented mental health and stalking issues of developing a rare election year case of convenient timing means that I am mean to women, then I guess so be it.
But coming from the party that would force a rape victim to give birth to the child rather than have an abortion, I just don’t see how my treating women like crap will ever match up with yours.