Search


Fix Best Blogs Award
MDE on Twitter
follow MDETweets at http://twitter.com

Daily Reads - Minnesota

Freedom Dogs
Kool Aid Report
Let Freedom Ring Blog
Minnesota Conservatives
MN Political Twitter
Nihlist in Golf Pants
Polinaut
Politics in Minnesota
SD 63
True North

Daily Reads - National

America Weakly
Blogometer – National Journal
Drudge Report
Hotline On Call
Hugh Hewitt
Insta Pundit
Little Green Footballs
Michelle Malkin
Political Wire
Politico
Real Clear Politics
Red State
SE Cupp
The Thicket

Television

KARE 11 (NBC)
KMSP 9 (FOX)
KSTP 5 (ABC)
WCCO 4 (CBS)
WFTC 29 (UPN)

Radio
Radio

Air America Minnesota
AM1500 KSTP
KTLK The FM News Talk
The Patriot
The Patriot II
WCCO 830

Newspapers

City Pages
MinnPost
Pioneer Press
Pulse of the Twin Cities
Star Tribune
The Rake

MSM Blogs

Capitol Letters – Matt Stolle
Discover Politics
Mary Lahammer (TPT)
MPR Polinaut
Pioneer Press – The Political Animal
Pioneer Press: City Hall Scoop
The Big Question (Star Tribune)
The Fix (Washington Post)

Liberal Blogs

Minnesota Lawyer Blog
PoliticsLaw Blog

Liberal Links

A Bluestem Prairie
Across the Great Divide
Capitol Brew-haha
Centrisity
City Pages Blotter
Democratic Underground – Minnesota
Lefty Blogs – Minnesota
Midwest Values Pac
Minnesota Brown
Minnesota Central
Mississippifarian
MN Publius
mnpACT!
Moderate Left
The Loyal Opposition
The Power Liberal
Tild
Truth Surfer
U-DFL Blog
Vox Verax


DBrigham Design


« | Home | »

ATTENTION DEDICATED READERS OF MINNESOTA DEMOCRATS EXPOSED

By Michael B. Brodkorb | September 29, 2006

This weekend please be on the lookout for the strange "MIKE HATCH FOR MINNESOTA" lawn signs which have been sprouting up around the state without a disclaimer.  These lawn signs are different than the standard "HATCH FOR GOVERNOR" lawn signs.  If you see a "MIKE HATCH FOR MINNESOTA" lawn sign WITH A DISCLAIMER please send take a picture of and send it to: http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/contact/

Thank you for support as I attempt to get to the bottom of this foul-smelling situation. 

Tags:

Topics: Uncategorized | 5 Comments »

5 Responses to “ATTENTION DEDICATED READERS OF MINNESOTA DEMOCRATS EXPOSED”

  1. Titus Says:
    September 29th, 2006 at 6:51 PM

    Mr. Brodkorb why is the disclaimer important? According to the following:
    A disclaimer is not required on lawn signs.
    Mary Beth Gossman, a staff attorney with the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings, said that based on an April decision by the Minnesota Court of Appeals that says it is unconstitutional to require a disclaimer, their office dismisses those types of complaints.

    What will this prove or not prove?

  2. Chris Says:
    September 30th, 2006 at 6:32 PM

    Mike,

    I have been vacationing in Western Minnesota for the last couple of days and have spotted many of the signs in question in the following towns: Hutchinson, Litchfield, Willmar, Spicer and Alexandria. All of the signs have had the disclaimers cut off of the bottom. I personally inspected one of the signs to determine whether it was printed without a disclaimer or whether the disclaimer was actually cut off. The bottom of the sign was jagged and frayed. The disclaimer was clearly cut off.

  3. Chris Says:
    September 30th, 2006 at 6:35 PM

    Titus, campaign materials (including signs) were required to have a disclaimer printed on the bottom up until about March of this year. Every lawn sign printer in the State knew this and would not have printed a sign without a disclaimer. The signs were printed before a disclaimer was no longer required. Therefore if any signs remain with a disclaimer, we can find out who prepared and paid for the signs.

  4. Andrew Says:
    October 2nd, 2006 at 9:25 AM

    Saw about a hundred of these things this weekend, all with the disclaimers cut off.

  5. tom knisely Says:
    October 2nd, 2006 at 11:37 AM

    I saw six to ten of these lawn signs in Circle Pines. All had the disclaimer cut off.

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.