Comments on: “SOMETHING FISHY” WITH MINIMUM WAGE BILL CO-SPONSORED BY WALZ/LASTNAME #2 http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2007/01/15/something-fishy-with-minimum-wage-bill-co-sponsored-by-walzlastname-2/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:19:50 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mark http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2007/01/15/something-fishy-with-minimum-wage-bill-co-sponsored-by-walzlastname-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44704 Mark Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:45:20 +0000 http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2007/01/15/something-fishy-with-minimum-wage-bill-co-sponsored-by-walzlastname-2/#comment-44704 This story is old news - people are wrapping their fish in it now. (pun intended) This story is old news – people are wrapping their fish in it now. (pun intended)

]]> By: Concerned Voter http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2007/01/15/something-fishy-with-minimum-wage-bill-co-sponsored-by-walzlastname-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44693 Concerned Voter Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:19:31 +0000 http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2007/01/15/something-fishy-with-minimum-wage-bill-co-sponsored-by-walzlastname-2/#comment-44693 It is always duck and dodge with these guys. You are correct, Wikipedia has nothing to do with this. The two issues are these: 1--Why, if the minimum wage is such a great thing, should there be any exemptions at all? 2--Why, mysteriously, did that exemption go to a territory where 75 percent of the people work for a company headquartered in the Speaker of the House's District? Let's keep this discussion on task here. It is always duck and dodge with these guys.

You are correct, Wikipedia has nothing to do with this.

The two issues are these:

1–Why, if the minimum wage is such a great thing, should there be any exemptions at all?

2–Why, mysteriously, did that exemption go to a territory where 75 percent of the people work for a company headquartered in the Speaker of the House’s District?

Let’s keep this discussion on task here.

]]>