Comments on: MDE IN THE NEWS: STAR TRIBUNE ARTICLE DETAILS CONFLICT BETWEEN REPUBLICANS AND RITCHIE #2

By: Michael B. Brodkorb

Michael B. Brodkorb — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:57:49 +0000

There is one “Fred Garvin” that consistently posts on Minnesota Democrats Exposed. In the last 24 hours, I have noticed that another person has started posting under the name “Fred Garvin.”

To prevent confusion, I would ask the person who started posting as “Fred Garvin” in last 24 hours to use a different name or different spelling. If you have any questions, or concerns, please let me know.

By: Woodbury Conservative

Woodbury Conservative — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:59:46 +0000

Come on Fred, this dual personality must be tough.

By: Fred Garvin

Fred Garvin — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:40:47 +0000

Would the real Fred Garvin please stand up
please stand up
please stand up

By: Fred Garvin

Fred Garvin — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:44:28 +0000

I would like to thank the right wing version of me for again posting silliness in an effort to discredit me. Apparently when one runs out of excuses, they turn to deception.

By: kyle

kyle — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:23:23 +0000

Here’s the actual website for PFAW – the one MDE posted is an interpretation of what they stand for. Best to read the ‘unspun’ version and make up your own mind.

http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/

By: Eva Young

Eva Young — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:11:48 +0000

Have to hand it to ya Brodkorb, your good at getting things into the press – especially with Dane Smith.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:51:41 +0000

Calling things “rabid” doesnt actually make them worst you know. It just makes you sound more unnecessarily partisan, something you may love to be but something most people think is quite annoying.

By: Fred Garvin

Fred Garvin — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:45:11 +0000

Eh, what does it matter for a liberal dick-munch like Mark Ritchie whether or not he has the trust of Republicans? Neutrality to Democrats isn’t about respecting conservatives, it’s about demonizing them.

By: John Boy

John Boy — Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:20:44 +0000

Negative and dishonest campaign? It’s called running a campaign. When the incumbent assumes they’re a shoe-in, and doesn’t really campaign, there’s a reason why they lose.

By: Fred Garvin

Fred Garvin — Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:34:27 +0000

Really? You want to throw stones at the guy who followed Mary Kiffmeyer?