Look at the title of his latest book: The Truth, with Jokes. Meaning: anything that isn’t obviously a joke is true. The jokes normally come in the form of satire. No where does he claim to be telling lies.

Harry Reid sets the caucus position. It’s clear that Klobuchar has not voted against her caucus.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00105

Reid – Nay
Klobuchar – Yea

Quagmire in Iraq? That’s funny. The guys on the ground are talking about how well the surge is going right now. Only a Democrat can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. As for bootlickers, what about Tim Walz and his 100% voting record with San Fran Nan Pelosi and Amy Klobuchar with her 100% voting record with Dingy Harry Reid.

The quagmire in Iraq.

All things considered, I would rather read another putrid Al Franken book than give Norm six more years to lick the president’s boots.

Keep up the great work. I hope you offend every Jewish person in Minnesota. Maybe we can make you the new Palestinian, er, DFL spokesman.

It’s hard to believe that Coleman can get away with making such an unAmerican statement.

Al Frankenfraud admits that his books are satire and full of lies. I don’t think any of those people actually said what he attributed to them. Even if they did, the bi-partisan 9/11 Commission disagrees. Clinton did nothing about terrorism even though we had some six terrorist attacks during his administration.

But it had been a waste of Gingrich’s time. Clinton, as I will demonstrate below, focused more on terrorism than any previous president. A month before Clinton left office, his administration was praised by two former Reagan counterterrorism officials. “Overall, I give them very high marks,” Robert Oakley, who served as ambassador for counterterrorism in the Reagan State Department, told the Washington Post. “The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama, which we think made him stronger.” Oakley’s successor in the Reagan administration, Paul Bremer, disagreed slightly. Bremer, who is currently the civilian administrator in Iraq told the Post he believed the Clinton administration had “correctly focused on Bin Laden.” Notice the word “focused” next to the words “on Bin Laden.” I’m talking to you, Newt. And all of you “Blame-Clinton-Firsters.”

Right-wingers like to call us the “Blame-America-First Crowd.” But they’ve blamed Clinton, who’s not just an American, but was the President, virtually nonstop. And Clinton was not just the President. He was the last elected president, who received more votes than any other candidate running against him. In two straight elections! So who’s blaming America? The left, which is blaming the terrorists? Or the right, which is blaming a twice-elected President of the United States?
**

Pages 106-107 of the hardcover edition of “Lies, and the Lying Liars” which precedes the paragraph quoted here.

You’re probably the guy who thinks 9/11 was a Jewish conspiracy. It’s no wonder Jews are abandoning the Democrat party. By the way, watch out for the black helicopters, I hear they’re headed to your house.

Go get f*cked. Now how do you like the sarcasm now?

Chuck? What’s Al’s position on Israel? Al is still Jewish, right?

Libs. Pwwfff.

C’mon, that’s a joke. I would bet that if I removed the name Al Franken and substituted some Republican, Liberals will come in droves to defend the comments.

Nice going Chuck!

Does Norm Coleman really represent Minnesota interests in the US Senate or Israeli interests? As much as Coleman wants to pretend they are the same, they aren’t.