Comments on: FACT CHECK ON STAR TRIBUNE’S STORY ON COLEMAN’S POLL NUMBERS

By: FACT CHECK ON STAR TRIBUNE’S STORY ON COLEMANâ€™S POLL NUMBERS #2 at Blogs for Norm!

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:33:12 +0000

[...] This story has been updated. [...]

By: Minnesota Democrats Exposed Â©

Minnesota Democrats Exposed Â© — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:38:23 +0000

[...] This story has been updated. [...]

By: Michael B. Brodkorb

Michael B. Brodkorb — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:37:25 +0000

Thanks JGMPLS.

By: JGMPLS

JGMPLS — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:21:05 +0000

Anyone who believes this blog does not make a difference is sadly mistaken.

Don’t you wonder how many reporters, editors, and the like read this as well?

Nice job MDE.

By: CCK

CCK — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:48:31 +0000

Check again, they’ve changed the article. Very interesting….

“WASHINGTON â€“ Although Minnesotaâ€™s senators saw their approval ratings drop in March, they both enjoyed a boost in April.

According to Survey USA, Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., jumped 6 percentage points from March to April â€“ from 47 percent to an approval rating of 53 percent.”

By: RamseyRep

RamseyRep — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:43:27 +0000

Since when is the Star-Tribune ever known to be accurate?

BTW the Red Star has been shut-out from the Pulitzer for the last 17 years. This is a great example of the poor journalism coming from this sorry excuse of a tabloid

By: Marc

Marc — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:40 +0000

Michael’s right, Brady Averill didn’t do this because she is a liberal (which she admittedly is) she did this because the Star Tribune’s new publishing company is too cheap to keep D.C. reporters who know their a-hole from a hole in the ground (i.e. Diaz, Smith).

By: Drew Emmer

Drew Emmer — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:56:22 +0000

They wouldn’t be trying to downplay Norm’s popularity because of their giddy support for Angry Al would they?

How is it that Franken can tell a pork chop joke about a Muslim and not get summarily decapitated by the left? (figuratively, of course)