Franken dropped the effenheimer? How DARE he!!!

It’s not as if the Veeper, Dick Cheney would EVER utter that!

Especially in the United States Senate….

Time to stock up!

Hey Chuck, how do you feel about blacks? And, how close to the skull do you set your clipper when shaving your head?

But why is it when confronted with the facts about Israeli spying on America, Chestnut goes MIA?

Apparently Chestnut prefers to stick to the “poopy face” rhetoric and ignore the essential issue which is that the State of Minnesota deserves much better than a choice between Franken and Coleman for the US Senate. Is it really too much to ask of the so-called mainstream parties that the 99% of us who are Christian and not witting servants of Israel get to have a dog in this so called fight?

Like Angry (potty mouth) Al?

Look it up and see for yourselves. Chestnut is a LIAR.

It’s easy to smoke out the lying Chestnut who claims that there are no differences between American and Israeli interests. If that’s really true, why are Israelis and jews constantly being busted for spying on America? Ever hear of J Pollard? Ever hear of AIPAC’s Rosen and Weissman? Ever hear of the Lavon Affair? Ever hear of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. Ever hear of the Israeli “art students” who were caught spying in the USA at the time of the 9-11 attacks. Chestnut is a liar and a fraud.

No wonder why Christine is down and out, everywhere see looks she shees shit!

if it helps my liberals friends Wellstone is gone!

Oh… and btw… I am very Minnesotan.

It’s becoming more and more obvious Chestnut is not from Minnesota, just another liar from the East Coast.

You seem to have forgotten what argument you were making. Hume said it was Wilson who interpreted a remark, but the *actual* CIA reports shows it was the former PM who made the interpretation. Nothing in your response at 9:41AM refutes your opinion from last night that Hume’s statement was true.

It was false.

One of the most stunning revelations contained in the Senate Intelligence Committee report on the CIA is that virtually everything Joseph Wilson has said about his trip to Niger, and the report that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Niger, is a lie.

First, contrary to what Wilson has said publicly, his wife, CIA employee Valerie Plame, did recommend him for the Niger investigation:

“The report states that a CIA official told the Senate committee that Plame “offered up” Wilson’s name for the Niger trip, then on Feb. 12, 2002, sent a memo to a deputy chief in the CIA’s Directorate of Operations saying her husband “has good relations with both the PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity.” The next day, the operations official cabled an overseas officer seeking concurrence with the idea of sending Wilson, the report said.

Confronted yesterday with the Senate report, Wilson could only offer a non sequitur and a lame denial:

Wilson stood by his assertion in an interview yesterday, saying Plame was not the person who made the decision to send him. Of her memo, he said: “I don’t see it as a recommendation to send me.”

Further, the Senate report indicates that Plame and Wilson, from the beginning, had an absurdly biased view of the subject Wilson was supposed to be investigating: “The report said Plame told committee staffers that she relayed the CIA’s request to her husband, saying, ‘there’s this crazy report’ about a purported deal for Niger to sell uranium to Iraq.”

As has been widely reported, Wilson conducted a half-baked investigation into the uanium report. But here is the most astonishing fact uncovered by the Senate Intelligence Committee: in his book and in countless interviews and op-ed pieces over the past year, Wilson has been lying about the contents of his own report to the CIA!:

The report also said Wilson provided misleading information to The Washington Post last June. He said then that he concluded the Niger intelligence was based on documents that had clearly been forged because “the dates were wrong and the names were wrong.”

“Committee staff asked how the former ambassador could have come to the conclusion that the ‘dates were wrong and the names were wrong’ when he had never seen the CIA reports and had no knowledge of what names and dates were in the reports,” the Senate panel said. Wilson told the panel he may have been confused and may have “misspoken” to reporters. The documents — purported sales agreements between Niger and Iraq — were not in U.S. hands until eight months after Wilson made his trip to Niger.

Wilson’s reports to the CIA added to the evidence that Iraq may have tried to buy uranium in Niger, although officials at the State Department remained highly skeptical, the report said.

Wilson said that a former prime minister of Niger, Ibrahim Assane Mayaki, was unaware of any sales contract with Iraq, but said that in June 1999 a businessman approached him, insisting that he meet with an Iraqi delegation to discuss “expanding commercial relations” between Niger and Iraq — which Mayaki interpreted to mean they wanted to discuss yellowcake sales. A report CIA officials drafted after debriefing Wilson said that “although the meeting took place, Mayaki let the matter drop due to UN sanctions on Iraq.”

According to the former Niger mining minister, Wilson told his CIA contacts, Iraq tried to buy 400 tons of uranium in 1998.

So: what Wilson actually told the CIA, contrary to his own oft-repeated claims, is that he was told by the former mining minister of Niger that in 1998, Iraq had tried to buy 400 tons of uranium from that country, and that Iraq’s overture was renewed the following year. What Wilson reported to the CIA was exactly the same as what President Bush said in his 2003 State of the Union address: there was evidence that Iraq had tried to buy uranium in Africa.

Recall Wilson’s famous op-ed in the New York Times, published on July 6, 2003, which ignited the whole firestorm over the famous “sixteen words” in Bush’s State of the Union speech. In that op-ed, Wilson identified himself as the formerly-unnamed person who had gone to Niger to investigate rumors of a possible uranium deal between Iraq and Niger. Here are the key words in Wilson’s article:

[I]n January, President Bush, citing the British dossier, repeated the charges about Iraqi efforts to buy uranium from Africa. The next day, I reminded a friend at the State Department of my trip and suggested that if the president had been referring to Niger, then his conclusion was not borne out by the facts as I understood them.

It was this flat-out lie about what Wilson learned in Niger, and what he reported to the CIA upon his return, that fueled the “sixteen words” controversy and led to the publication of Wilson’s best-selling account, titled, ironically, The Politics of Truth.

One can only conclude that Joseph Wilson has perpetrated one of the most astonishing hoaxes in American history. But here is what I really don’t get: didn’t the administration have access to all of this information about Wilson’s report? And if so, why didn’t they use it when Wilson was dominating the news cycle with his lies?

Wrong again! Here is a link to the actual CIA report:
http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/jan29/DX439.pdf

While Hume says that Wilson interpreted the remark to mean the sale of uranium, but the actual CIA report makes it clean that it was former Nigerian PM Ibrahim who made this interpretation:

**
2. Former Nigerien prime minister Ibrahim ((Mayaki)), who was Niger’s foreign minister from 1996-1997 and Niger’s prime minister from 1997-1999 and who maintained close ties to the current Nigerien government, stated he was unaware of any contracts being signed between Niger and rogue states for the sale of yellowcake during his tenure as both foreign minister and prime minister. Mayaki however, did relate that in June 1999 Barka ((Tefridj)), a Nigerien/Algerian businessman, approached him and insisted that Mayaki meet with an Iraqi delegation to discuss “expanding commercial relations” between Niger and Iraq. Although the meeting took place, Mayaki let the matter drop due to the United Nations (UN) sanctions against Iraq and the fact that he opposed doing business with Iraq. Mayaki said that he interpreted the phrase “expanding commercial relations” to mean that Iraq wanted to discuss uranium yellowcake sales.
**

Shameless.

Hume characterization of the FDR letter was wildly off the mark:

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=9197

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/01/31/dont_use_fdr_to_undermine_social_security/

I mean, at the time, who wouldn’t want to tell the story of a woman in combat who fought like a mad dog? And, I believe, the story was corrected as more information was available.

Maybe lazy reporting but if there was a lie in the story it was the Post or the Army.

The Jessica Lynch story was pure propoganda and it worked but it wasn’t just Fox repeating the story.

And still it’s no excuse for a wannabe Senator to use foul language in Public.

Angry Al is doing exactly what liberals do. That is, whatever they say about conservatives is EXACTLY what they’re doing. When Potty Mouth Al calls Republicans “shameless”, the truth is, LIBERALS are shameless.

It’s almost without exception. Virtually every time these clowns make a claim about a republican it is THEY who are doing it themselves and not the republican. These idiots are liars, schemers and are SHAMELESS.

F’ing shameless.

Is absolutely true. That is what Wilson reported. And that is how Wilson interpreted the information in his report to the CIA. There’s not a thread of anything fabricated in that statement. Nothing.

Of course, Wilson went on to lie about his report to the CIA in a totally fabricated NYT editorial. The good news is, the Senate commission accurately documents exactly what Hume reported.

The FDR letter also was accurate. It would surprise me if FDR didn’t have such conversations or debates when setting up that massive, failing socialist system. Maybe if they tried privatization, it would be in better shape today.

In any case, liberals hatred of FoxNews is silly. Study after study shows that the news content is what they say it is: fair and balanced. The commentary is without question, quite conservative…. but hey, what’s one right-leaning media outlet in a sea of liberal wack-a-doo outfits…

By the way, since when does disliking somebody make it ok to be a first class potty mouth?

He completely took an FDR letter out of context and parsed it in a way that made it look like social security should be privatized. (nope)

He also said that Iraq was safer for American troops than California because fewer soldiers die in Iraq every day that in California. (He kind of forgot that you need to factor population into the math.)

He’s said that Pres. Bush Senior never criticized Bill Clinton or his Administration (wrong again)

And he invented this tidbit from whole cloth:
*
HUME: But Wilson’s report to the CIA actually confirmed that the former prime minister of Niger had met with Iraqis to discuss what was called “commercial relations,” which Wilson interpreted as meaning sales of yellowcake uranium.
*

Wilson didn’t interpret it this way at all. He just says stuff over the air hoping folks on the right repeat it and before you know it, the story is that Jessica Lynch valiantly fired every last bullet from her M-16 until she didn’t have any more fight left in her.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,82923,00.html