Search


Fix Best Blogs Award
MDE on Twitter
follow MDETweets at http://twitter.com

Daily Reads - Minnesota

Freedom Dogs
Kool Aid Report
Let Freedom Ring Blog
Minnesota Conservatives
MN Political Twitter
Nihlist in Golf Pants
Polinaut
Politics in Minnesota
SD 63
True North

Daily Reads - National

America Weakly
Blogometer – National Journal
Drudge Report
Hotline On Call
Hugh Hewitt
Insta Pundit
Little Green Footballs
Michelle Malkin
Political Wire
Politico
Real Clear Politics
Red State
SE Cupp
The Thicket

Television

KARE 11 (NBC)
KMSP 9 (FOX)
KSTP 5 (ABC)
WCCO 4 (CBS)
WFTC 29 (UPN)

Radio
Radio

Air America Minnesota
AM1500 KSTP
KTLK The FM News Talk
The Patriot
The Patriot II
WCCO 830

Newspapers

City Pages
MinnPost
Pioneer Press
Pulse of the Twin Cities
Star Tribune
The Rake

MSM Blogs

Capitol Letters – Matt Stolle
Discover Politics
Mary Lahammer (TPT)
MPR Polinaut
Pioneer Press – The Political Animal
Pioneer Press: City Hall Scoop
The Big Question (Star Tribune)
The Fix (Washington Post)

Liberal Blogs

Minnesota Lawyer Blog
PoliticsLaw Blog

Liberal Links

A Bluestem Prairie
Across the Great Divide
Capitol Brew-haha
Centrisity
City Pages Blotter
Democratic Underground – Minnesota
Lefty Blogs – Minnesota
Midwest Values Pac
Minnesota Brown
Minnesota Central
Mississippifarian
MN Publius
mnpACT!
Moderate Left
The Loyal Opposition
The Power Liberal
Tild
Truth Surfer
U-DFL Blog
Vox Verax


DBrigham Design


« | Home | »

BACKGROUND ON VOTE VETS

By Michael B. Brodkorb | May 9, 2007

A dedicated reader of Minnesota Democrats Exposed sent me background information on Vote Vets, the group running attacks ads in Minnesota against Senator Norm Coleman. 

Please check back to Minnesota Democrats Exposed for more information. 

### 

VoteVets.org 

Formerly the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) PAC

Founded and supported by Veterans and seasoned campaign operatives, IAVA PAC views defense policy as an American priority, not a Democratic or Republican partisan issue. – Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America PAC Web site, http://www.iavapac.org/about.html

For the sake of all Americans, we cannot allow partisanship to dominate the debate around Iraq, Afghanistan and the threat of terrorism. – Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America PAC Web site, http://www.iavapac.org/about.html

In 2006, Vote Vets Worked to Elect Democrats to Congress:

Failed Democrat Presidential Candidate Wesley K. Clark serves on Board of Advisors:

Co-Founder and Chairman of Vote Vets, Jon Soltz, has been “LOYAL SUPPORTER” and “ATTACK DOG” for John Kerry:

Has Worked and Stumped for John Kerry:

Has Called America “Less Safe” at least THREE times:

Failed Democrat Congressional Candidate Paul Hackett Serves on Board of Advisors:

Hackett famously called President Bush a “chicken hawk” during the 2006 election:

Tags:

Topics: Uncategorized | 22 Comments »

22 Responses to “BACKGROUND ON VOTE VETS”

  1. Chestnut Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 6:36 PM

    Ironic that a self-proclaimed anti-partisan group won’t support Republicans and only works for Democrats… of course, I forget… non-partisan means “Democrat”… Hogwash.

  2. Chris Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 8:02 PM

    These guys are learning the lesson of John Kerry and John Murtha: fight in a war, come home, speak against it and run for political office.

  3. Sean Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 8:20 PM

    Well, unlike Mike Brodkorp, Norm Coleman, or the majority of the right wing talking heads these people have gone and sacrificed for our country.

    So, really, after going and botching the war in Iraq (which the political director of the MNGoop even admitted yesterday) are we safer now than we were 6 years ago?

    Probably not.

    It could be worse, it could be an anonymous group created a week before the election so it’s donors aren’t revealed until after the election.

    Sean

  4. otterscrubber Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 8:21 PM

    The swift boating of another batch of veterans begins! Very telling that there isn’t one word about Norm’s position in response to these ads. (Actually if anyone knows what Norm’s position is, kudos) Oldest trick in campaigning: if you can’t answer a charge, attack the person making the charge.

  5. Chris Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 8:34 PM

    Sean,

    I’d like to see you campaign on the fact that we are less safe than we were 6 years ago. We just uncovered yet another plot by Islamofascists to murder our troops. The Bush administration has worked diligently to uncover and prevent terrorist attacks. Thanks to bringing the war on terror against the terrorists we haven’t had an attack in almost 6 years.

  6. Andrew Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 8:58 PM

    Well terrorists are too busy forming organizations in Iraq and killing our troops there. It is much closer to home and much easier. Americans have been attacked for the past 4 years now in Iraq by terroristic methods.

    The ad apparently never says Norm’s name (someone told me this so I got this from word of mouth) and it really only attacks Bush. Maybe a lot of people wont even make the connection for Norm’s sake.

  7. otterscrubber Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 9:20 PM

    Chris, you are reasoning is getting into a dangerous area. The fact that the US hasn’t been attacked may be because of law enforcement efforts. It may be luck. The US was attacked on its soil in ’93 and then not again until ’01. Just because we are expecting to be attacked again doesn’t mean it will happen in a time frame we expect. The talking point that “we haven’t been hit, so we are doing it right” will absolutely evaporate if we get hit again. If Bush wants us to credit him for there not being a domestic attack, who do you think will get blamed if the ball is dropped and we get hit again?

  8. PoliHack » The Worst Oppo Research Ever Conducted. Ever. Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 9:24 PM

    [...] Behold. The worst opposition research ever produced known to man: Minnesota Democrats Exposed dossier on the political arm of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA), VoteVets.org. [...]

  9. Chris Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 9:36 PM

    Andrew,

    Your comment begs the question: Would you rather have them attacking us at home?

    Otter,

    I would not call killing Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Amjad Farooqi, Mohammed Atef, Ali Qaed Senyan al-Harthi (aka Abu Ali), Abu Hazim al-Shair, Omar al-Farouq and capturing Abu Faraj al-Libbi, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah, Ramzi Binalshibh, Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, Mohammed Haydar Zammar, Ali Abdul Rahman al-Ghamdi, and Mohamedou Ould Slahi using “law enforcement” techniques. The only way we will “drop the ball” again is if Democrats who deny there is a war on terrorism (like John Edwards) get elected in 2008.

  10. Dave of the VRWC Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 9:52 PM

    “The swift boating of another batch of veterans begins!”

    Where do even begin? First of all, the SBVT only went after Kerry, not a “batch of veterans”. And pretty much all they did was publize Kerry’s quotes. Kind of like free advertising for Kerry.

  11. Chestnut Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 10:02 PM

    If by “swift boating” you mean “expose the truth”, o.k., it’s swift boating.

  12. theskippy Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 10:12 PM

    Correction, there hasn’t been a terrorist attack on American soil since the Anthrax attacks.

  13. otterscrubber Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 10:19 PM

    Another way the ball could be dropped is to ignore PDB’s that say things like “Bin Laden Determined…” or not heed the warnings of terrorism czars, etc. Law enforcement is responsible for the Ft Dix thing, the guys you mentioned are overseas (I think).

  14. Chris Says:
    May 9th, 2007 at 10:47 PM

    Otter,

    The guys I mentioned were captured or killed by the U.S. military. Another way the ball could be dropped was to have terrorism for eight years (beginning with the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993) and thinking law enforcement was going to end it. We did nothing during the Clinton administration when 9/11 was being planned.

    Since you mentioned the Fort Dix “thing” as you put it, I wonder when the Democrats are going to blame our presence in Bosnia and Kosovo for the past 14 years as being responsible for why they hated us so much they were going to try to kill our troops.

  15. otterscrubber Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 6:24 AM

    Oh yeah I forgot … its Clinton’s fault, always is.

  16. Chestnut Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 7:39 AM

    It’s no more Bush’s fault (8 months in office, and never briefed by the Clinton administration on the al Queda threat) than it is Clinton’s (8 years in office, didn’t have an al Queda strategy, underestimated the threat).

    It’s fair to say Clinton could/should have done something, but didn’t. But in fairness to Bill, the whole world was underestimating the threat.

    Still, Clinton halved the strength of the U.S. military during his administration… so, it’s ridiculous to blame Bush for unpreparedness for today’s conflicts.

  17. Drew Emmer Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 8:56 AM

    Follow the cash. The spin is that these war vets are magnanimously throwing their names behind a grassroots effort to solve our war dillemma. That’s poppycock.

    Each one of these guys is getting a direct or indirect cash benie for joining the chorus.

    That’s how George operates. It’s a partisan scam.

  18. David Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 9:01 AM

    It would be nice to have your terrorists in a box, but we don’t get to “choose” where they attack us. They are killing Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan, because that’s where they have the highest chance of success.

    They will do the same in America when the chance arises and are likely waiting for the perfect opportunity to get maximum death and destruction to fuel their worldwide PR machine.

    All we are doing by being in Iraq is making it easier for them to recruit new members and fueling more hatred for America throughout the world.

  19. INS Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 9:39 AM

    MDE what happened? When you receive a press release of oppo research, you’re pretty good at consistently citing your source.

    But a “dedicated reader”? This is especially ironic considering the thrust of the OR is that VOTE VETS claims to be non-partisan but isn’t. Yet you don’t reveal that you’re using an OR drawn up from a non-partisan source.

  20. BACKGROUND ON VOTE VETS #2 at Blogs for Norm! Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 10:15 AM

    [...] It's 18 months before the November '08 elections, but Vote Vets is already running ads targeting Senator Norm Coleman.   "In the ad, Batiste directly accuses Bush of not listening to the commanders who tried to tell him how badly things were going in Iraq, of 'continuing to pursue a failed strategy that is breaking our great Army and Marine Corps” and of 'place[ing] our nation in peril.'" Source: The Big Question/Star Tribune, May 9, 2007 [...]

  21. RamseyRep Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 12:26 PM

    Oh NO, Is there anyone in he universe who can take Westley Clark seriously?

    Clark is the bumbling fool who almost started WW3 by ordering troops to attack Russians in Kosovo.

  22. LIVE-BLOGGING VOTE-VETS PRESS CONFERENCE | Minnesota Democrats Exposed © Says:
    May 10th, 2007 at 2:37 PM

    [...] Vote Vets is having a press conference at 2:30 p.m. in St. Paul to discuss the ads running against Senator Norm Coleman.  I'm here to live-blog the event, so please check back. [...]

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.