“I like to touch and be touched.”

As opposed to whom?

LMAO x 2.

No where did I say anything like “if it feels good do it”, nowhere did I say MB wasn’t being factual (I did actually say that the post was fine because it was factual). Nobody has yet explained why anybody should care that a candidate likes erotica. So if John Kline had a couple Playboys or Seifert had pictures of Paris Hilton on his computer should they resign? I’d like to see that press conference, “I John Kline feel I must resign my seat due to the fact I that saw, and will admit enjoyed, video of between four and five naked adult women while accidentally watching Cinemax television this past Friday night. I regret any pain I may have cause my family, supporters and constituents.”

Believe me I am having fun with it. I admit though I find the foaming reaction of gld’s more entertaining than the original post.

You still haven’t been able to explain what the underlining issue is. It is fine to post it and comment on it but nobody has been able to explain what on the profile makes him any less qualified for the seat if he decided to run, other than typos I guess.

If you don’t like him on the issues then talk about the issues but that makes his profile meaningless. Otherwise I have to assume the die-hard Republicans are simple concerned with winning and not issues.

MDE: Any comments from “Dbark1300?”

You guys need to get over this “let’s be nice to Democrats because then they’ll be nice to us and we can talk about issues only and that’s how we’ll win.”

Defeatism at it’s best.

By the way, Michael did not draw any conclusions about Barkley’s dating profile, nor was he critical of it — he just posted a link. Draw your own conclusions about the appropriateness of the profile but don’t be critical of Michael for posting it.

Lastly, Barkely made this relevant when he posted his OFFICIAL US SENATE PHOTOGRAPH as well as mentioning that fact that he’s a FORMER US SENATOR. He’s trying to pick up chicks with that resume so it’s clearly fair game.

What is out of bounds is people like Andy Aplikowski who viscously attack the State GOP with reckless disregard to the truth and now try to take the moral high ground. Rumor has it that Andy is one of the driving forces behind Repya challenging Coleman.

If people like Andy spent half their time focused on Democrats rather than spending it all tearing down good Republicans, we wouldn’t be in the position we are today.

Great work Michael. This post is completely appropriate and FACTUAL. The Democrats don’t like it because it’s true, but I’m disappointed that your fellow Republicans have been so critical and do not have the will to fight and defeat the Democrats.

No, the people in the 6th deny they are into erotica. I doubt the average computer in that district has any less porn on it than anywhere else or that the bachelor parties consist of nothing but bible reading and turning in early.

Meanwhile the post about Entenza’a little cabal gets almost no attention.

When I first saw this topic, it seemed like a likely fake. It wouldn’t be the first time someone spoofed a politician online.

That it turns out to be true… LOL!

To defame is attack the good name or reputation of, as by uttering or publishing maliciously or falsely anything injurious; ie slander or libel.

Since this is true, it’s not defamation.

ROFLMAO, however your post accusing Michael of posting information that is false, ie libel, could be considered defamation since what Michael said is true.

As for blobs devoted to bashing Republicans, lol just look at the Liberal links section!

That so-called Shameful thing cuts both ways.

1. His U.S. Senate photo

2. His body type: “A few extra pounds”

3. His best features: “Eyes”

4. Pets he likes: “Gerbils”

5. His job: “I am going to start my old law practice up because driving a metro mobility bus is not my dream job.”

6. For fun, the old cut & pasted: “I love holding hands and taking walks with someone special.”

6. Spelling Led Zeppelin, “Led Zeplin”

Run. Fast.