How do you sleep at night?

You did agree with this portion of your link though, didn’t you?

“Charges of partisanship in the SoS office should be taken seriously by voters…and the defense should be more than, ‘wa-a-a-h, the attacks are just partisan’. Even if you accept that the charges are partisan it does not automatically mean the charges are false…and a SoS that uses a “two wrongs make a right” arguement are too childish to be returned to office.”

I’m sure you do.

http://alwaysrightusuallycorrect.blogspot.com/2006/11/why-kiffmeyer-should-not-be-re-elected.html

Here’s a snippet, referring to the former SoS:

ELECTION RESULTS…STILL INCOMPLETE
An issue that is covered in the next section is odd-year reporting…or lack thereof. However a part of that issue falls under Kiffmeyer’s failures regarding timeliness. In 2001 general election results were not immediately reported (and a minor note…it seems some precints still have not reported). Why?

This site is presented as a pilot for local elections. Only certain counties are participating in this pilot.

And in 2003…

The Office of the Secretary of State is reporting election results for selected local elections held November 4, 2003 as part of its pilot to advance local election information and results reporting.

OK, 2-4 years so far for the “pilot”. And for 2005…well, the pilot must be over. And the result is…? Either the pilot was a success and 2005 should have reported out-state results or the pilot was a failure and the claim “Minnesota is among the first states to pilot real-time election results reporting to the precinct level for cities and school districts” is falacious. Either way it has been a year since the 2005 elections and NOTHING has been reported.
===

You can Google the rest yourself.

You got some sort of example to go along with your hyperventilation?

Thanks, Michael, for confirming what most of us know already. And that is what a significant improvement our new Secretary of State has been.

Flash

Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN