« SELF-IDENTIFIED “REPORTER” FOR MINNESOTA MONITOR ADVERTISES COLEMAN VS. FRANKEN MATCH-UP | Home | RITCHIE GIVES INTERVIEW TO MTV, CONTINUES DUCKING QUESTIONS FROM LOCAL MEDIA »
MORE BAD PRESS FOR RITCHIE IN THE NEWSPAPER
By Michael B. Brodkorb | December 11, 2007

This is from yesterday's Star Tribune. This story appeared on the front page of the metro section, above the fold.
Tags: Uncategorized
Topics: Uncategorized | 8 Comments »
8 Responses to “MORE BAD PRESS FOR RITCHIE IN THE NEWSPAPER”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.










December 11th, 2007 at 8:09 AM
[...] Michael B. Brodkorb created an interesting post today on MORE BAD PRESS FOR RITCHIE IN THE NEWSPAPERHere’s a short outline [...]
December 11th, 2007 at 9:11 AM
“MORE BAD PRESS…”
You mean the same item you wrote four entries on yesterday?
December 11th, 2007 at 9:16 AM
As I wrote in the post, I meant to publish the picture yesterday.
December 11th, 2007 at 9:19 AM
Want to try reading that again? You do indeed say the story was in yesterday’s paper but unless I’m missing it, you don’t say that you “meant to publish the picture yesterday.”
December 11th, 2007 at 9:32 AM
Oops…I’ll fix that.
December 11th, 2007 at 10:06 AM
You know this shows the Star Tribune and their pro Democrat agenda.
If this had been a Republican Secretary of State this will be front page every day!
If this had been a Republican Secretary of State there will be editorials every day demanding the Secretary of State resign.
The fact they have to put Ritchie on page B1 instead of trying to bury it like they did the largest tax cut rally ever in the State of Minnesota shows just how serious it is.
Walter hanson
Minneapolis, MN
December 11th, 2007 at 11:14 AM
I have it from a senior government official that Ritchie is not only ducking questions from the media, but that he hasn’t been cooperating or returning the legislative auditor’s phone calls either!
December 12th, 2007 at 5:10 PM
Michael, I was actually going to praise you for admitting your mistake and changing, and yet I don’t see that you actually did that (as in this still says the same thing it did yesterday).