« AS PREDICTED, CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD DISMISSES COMPLAINT AGAINST RITCHIE | Home | NRCC PRESS RELEASE: “WALZ VOTES FOR TAX INCREASES OVER CLEAN AMT PATCH” »
ERIK PAULSEN ENDORSED BY FORMER CONGRESSMAN BILL FRENZEL
By Michael B. Brodkorb | December 13, 2007
Click here to read the complete letter from Congressman Bill Frenzel.
Topics: Uncategorized | 23 Comments »
23 Responses to “ERIK PAULSEN ENDORSED BY FORMER CONGRESSMAN BILL FRENZEL”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
December 13th, 2007 at 11:11 am
I would have figured the first letter like this might come from the current occupant of the seat. I’ll be waiting to see if Ramstad endorses him. Paulsen probably doesn’t want that one until after the endorsement since that might not help him with the party faithful.
December 13th, 2007 at 11:53 am
In reading Get Real’s comments in the past on this blog, one can only conclude that he is a extreme left-winger. And this makes him an expert in the inner workings of the GOP because….
December 13th, 2007 at 12:01 pm
Clearly Paulsen is trying to distance himself from Ramstad by adopting the exact same “Ramstad Orange” campaign design. How devious.
Jim Hoveland is doing the same thing, but he’s DFL.
December 13th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
How devious.
Yeah, no democrat has ever copied the same “red” we often see.
December 13th, 2007 at 3:51 pm
Hey all, thanks for your comments. When Jim’s endorsement comes, I’m sure MDE will post it. And if it doesn’t come, it probably just means that Jim forgot to endorse Erik.
December 13th, 2007 at 3:57 pm
And thank you for your worthless insight.
December 13th, 2007 at 3:58 pm
Master, do you believe Ramstad will endorse Paulsen?
December 13th, 2007 at 4:01 pm
Yes
December 13th, 2007 at 4:06 pm
I guess we’ll just have to wait and see. I suppose they have a history together, so he might. Paulsen sure hasn’t represented himself as the moderate, common sense republican that Ramstad has. I think the extreme right wing of your party will be far more comfortable with Paulsen then they were with Ramstad, but I guess time will tell. Maybe he’ll send out his endorsement letter soon.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:09 pm
My party doesn’t have an “extreme right wing”, but thanks for worrying about their comfort.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
Who were those people who complained about Ramstad being a RINO? It wasn’t Democrats. I’ve never heard those same folks using RINO and Paulsen in the same sentence.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:14 pm
Those people are called Conservatives, nothing extreme about them.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:16 pm
Are liberals extreme?
December 13th, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Which ones? Most of the ones that I know are not.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:24 pm
Good for you. I didn’t think you’d pass the “Can we see the other side as anything other than crazy loonies?” test. Have a nice evening. It’s been nice chatting.
December 14th, 2007 at 12:33 pm
Let’s all hope Bonoff gets the dfl nomination. She’ll be easy pickings for Paulsen. Have you guys heard about her “plan for Iraq”? It essentially says “We should get out of Iraq”.
http://mnpublius.com/2007/12/bonoff-outlines-plans-for-ending-war-in-iraq/
The best part – her speech wasn’t “In front of several hundred veterans and military families” as her press release claims. That’s a ridiculous overstatement! She was actually speaking to the far-left Peace Forum. Hardly red-white-and-blue CD3 residents.
As far as I can tell – she’s avoided actual veterans groups.
Keep it red!
December 14th, 2007 at 3:27 pm
Say, KIR?
From my POV, Erik is a dream come true.
It’s gonna be fun takin’ this seat from the GOPers.
As a veteran that despises the GreedOverPrinciples party for the old fashioned reason – they’ve earned it – Paulsen’s record provides what can generously be called “a target-rich environment.”
December 14th, 2007 at 4:09 pm
Sen. Bonoff’s press release has been corrected to appropriately define the nature of the forum where she gave her remarks. Let’s not play gotcha but actually discuss issues. With over 70% against the war in Iraq, how can a forum on the war in Iraq be called “far left”? If that’s the case, then 70% of the US is “fat left.”
December 14th, 2007 at 5:14 pm
Eric Black is reporting rumors that Ramstad might still change his mind. If these discussions are taking place, it doesn’t say much about the party leadership’s confidence in Representative Paulsen.
http://www.ericblackink.com/2007/12/14/ramstad-still-seriously-considering-unretiring/
December 14th, 2007 at 5:37 pm
I thought the members of Iraqi Veterans Against the War WERE in fact VETERANS. That would be pretty red-white-and blue in my book. The the room was filled to overflowing, and republicans candidates were invited and did not attend. Since over 70% of the American People are opposed to the war, there were probably republicans in attendance who are tired of the same tired old rhetoric and looking for real solutions. Paulsen is not the answer either.
December 14th, 2007 at 7:53 pm
Ok West Metro Dem. Let’s take your word for it – this is a totally mainstream group that represents the view of nearly every American.
Why would Bonoff have to lie about that in a press release saying her Iraq plan is “get out of Iraq”? Why misrepresent the group using Clinton-esque semantics only the back off that language when she’s caught? Why not just call the group by their name?
Oh, because they *are* a far-left group that doesn’t represent mainstream America. That’s why.
You don’t win elections in a suburban Minnesota congressional district by hanging out with Code Pink et al. I know that may come as a shock to those who spend your days in the echo chamber of democratunderground and daily kos, but it is true.
You want to talk issues – let’s talk about issues.
Issue Number 1 – Integrity.
With a single press release – Bonoff has proven, in my opinion, that she has none.
Anyone else have thoughts on the CD3 presumptive democrat nominee lying to the public?
December 14th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
Keep it red,
I did not say I was supporting Sen. Bonoff. I made the comment that her press release had been corrected to reflect the true nature of the event. Period. I will not comment on her position on the Iraq war because I do not agree with it.
I would also take issue with your last comment….”presumptive democrat nominee”….I’d say….let’s wait and see.
December 15th, 2007 at 1:32 am
Why so much talk about Paulsen……when the word on capitol hill is that Ramsted isn’t going to retire????