« WALZ FLIP-FLOPS ON OBAMA; WALZ PREVIOUSLY UNSURE IF OBAMA WAS A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR SOUTHERN MINNESOTA | Home | WALZ FLIP-FLOPS ON OBAMA; WALZ PREVIOUSLY UNSURE IF OBAMA WAS A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR SOUTHERN MINNESOTA #2 »
COLEMAN FOR U.S. SENATE PRESS RELEASE: “SEVERE FRANKEN WARNING: FRANKEN TO ADDRESS MACALESTER STUDENTS, THOSE WITH DIFFERING POLITICAL OPINIONS NOT WELCOME”
By Michael B. Brodkorb | February 7, 2008
SAINT PAUL – The following Severe Franken Warning has been issued by the Coleman for Senate campaign:
Attention all Macalester students: If you care about your conservative friends, please warn them to not accidentally drop by comedian Al Franken’s campus appearance tonight! During one of his last trips to a college campus, Franken verbally abused and mocked Carleton College student Peter Fritz because he respectfully disagreed with Franken’s liberal political views.
According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune: "Franken reportedly began peppering [Peter] Fritz with questions about supporting President Bush and former President Ronald Reagan's tax increases. Fritz told me that he got tense and, as he does in those situations, started chewing the inside of his mouth, a gesture he said was mimicked by Franken; Fritz said he also thought that Franken mocked his style of speech.” (“C.J.: Doggone it! Where is Stuart Smalley when Franken needs him?” Star Tribune, Jan. 24, 2008)
"We're going to go ahead and warn Macalester conservatives or any students who hold different political opinions than Mr. Franken to stay away from the appearance for their own peace of mind," said Cullen Sheehan, campaign manager. "We’re hoping that this warning will save any intellectually curious and politically engaged Macalester students from assuming that they will be able to have a dignified and respectful discussion with Al Franken. It's clear that Al Franken is open to differences of opinion — as long as they agree with him!"
This "Severe Franken Warning" has been issued by Coleman for Senate specifically for the Macalester College Democrats meeting tonight at 10:00 p.m.
Disclaimer: This is intended to be “satire” and should not be taken, in any way, to be, uh, serious!
###
This post also appears on Blogs for Norm!, an online community and blog covering the 2008 U.S. Senate campaign in Minnesota. The primary goal of Blogs for Norm! is to organize bloggers who support U.S. Senator Norm Coleman.
Topics: 2008 U.S. Senate, Al Franken, Mike Ciresi, Norm Coleman | 69 Comments »
69 Responses to “COLEMAN FOR U.S. SENATE PRESS RELEASE: “SEVERE FRANKEN WARNING: FRANKEN TO ADDRESS MACALESTER STUDENTS, THOSE WITH DIFFERING POLITICAL OPINIONS NOT WELCOME””
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
February 7th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Better yet I encourage all to go see Angry Al and confront him as hostil as possible.
We will watch for the meltdown video here. 
Actually I know Angry Al’s handlers will be all over him to play nice no matter what as the last time hurt him pretty bad.
So for extra credit and loads of fun, please go and visit Angry Al and have a go at him. For once he will have to hold his anger and it will be fun to watch him biting his lip.
I wonder if as many people cast caucus votes for Angry Al as they did for Osama, er I mean Obama?
Something sure smells a lot like the Hatch campaign.
C’mon twopudd, are we on for the right to post bet over Franken and Coleman??
You have written on and on about how Norm is toast.
You should have no fear to take the bet if Norm wins, you never post here again, if Franken wins, I will never post here again. 
I know, I know, you would never get anyone to come read your shit blog if you were not able to come here and get attention.
Still, if you are going to run your big mouth, you should be able to back it up some. 
What say you puddles?
February 7th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Don’t forget puddles, you would still be able to post until after the elections. Maybe by then you might have picked up a reader or two?
Doubtful, but just maybe. 
February 7th, 2008 at 4:36 pm
So, that “young republiCon” is played the “victim card”, and ol’ Smokescreen’s handlers picked it up and is playing it again??!?
Oh, wait – it’s just Michael, “trying” to be funny.
Shoulda known – ol’ Smokescreen is “humor impaired”….
February 7th, 2008 at 4:44 pm
There has to be something humorous about what Franken say and calls satire. Only a sadist would call the crap Franken says humorous.
February 7th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
dogbreath, thank you for proving, once again, what an extremist whackjob you are.
Fortunately, the moderates (where elections are won) are recognizing you ARE what the GOP is all about.
You’ll never see another GOPer controlled House, Senate, and Oval Office in your life time, because the moderates recognize how badly you (cheney)ed it up, this time.
February 7th, 2008 at 5:37 pm
I see, think Franken is humorless makes me a extremist whackjob. LOL, now what grand leap of illogic brought you to that conclusion? Was it all the whacky weed you ingested as a REMF?
By the way, I know a lot of liberals and democrats that think Franken is a crass, humorless jerk.
Now if people on both sides of the political aisle think Franken is crass and humorless, that doesn’t bode well for your mindset.
February 7th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
No, dogbreath, the fact you said the following, makes you an extremist whackjob:
Only a sadist would call the crap Franken says humorous.
Do try to keep up with what you post, won’t you?
February 7th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
Hey Tommy, I suggest you take your own advice. That comment doesn’t make me an extremist whackjob. A sadist is a person who enjoys being cruel, and Franken’s ‘jokes’ are definitely cruel. That you think Franken is funny isn’t surprising because you definitely enjoy being cruel. LOL, but the best part is, you swing in miss on every effort to be insulting. A three year old could toss out better insults than you do.
February 7th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
A three year old could toss out better insults than you do.
No, you can’t.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:02 pm
See, even a three year old would be able to come up with a better come back than you do, thou foul defacer of God’s handiwork.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
By the way Tommy:
Eat my knickers thou incestuous codpiece sniffing harpy.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
Lick my jumpboots, leg.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
And how do you know I’m not jump qualified there REMF? You have no knowledge of what I did when I was in the military. But then, you don’t know much of anything, which is why you have to resort to a second rate golf shop for work. You couldn’t even get into General College.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
“And how do you know I’m not jump qualified there REMF?”
‘Cause it took ya so long to figure out what a “leg” is, leg.
“You have no knowledge of what I did when I was in the military.
True. By the same token, I doubt you were even IN the military. As for my service, you know my name and you know where the Hopkins VFW is; go in and look for my name on the Membership Wall.
The VFW verifies military service before granting membership.
Ya putz.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
Hey, I offered to show you my DD214, so far, you’ve been to chicken to even make a meet time and place. LOL, and my hubby, the Marine Recon, would bring his DD214 too.
BY the way, I’m a patient at the VA, I’m a service connected Vet, the VA verifies veteran status too. And you can be darn sure they combed through my military medical records with a fine tooth comb hoping to deny the disability status.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Hey, I offered to show you my DD214,
And I offered to show you mine, also. And I said I have no problemo lookin’ at your hubby’s papers also.
And you can be darn sure they combed through my military medical records with a fine tooth comb hoping to deny the disability status.
Agreed.
I’m also service-connected, and a member of the Disabled American Veterans.
So, is the Hopkins VFW agreeable for you?
February 7th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
No, I hate that VFW, it’s a dump.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:27 pm
If it’s a dump, you’ll fit right in.
Tomorrow? 1200 hours?
Or are you completely full o’ shit, dogbreath?
February 7th, 2008 at 7:30 pm
No, it would fit you though. And sorry, but some of us actually work for a living, so I’ll be at work.
It figures you’d pick a time like that because you know I work and that way you could claim I was the one who backed out.
And if we meet, it’s going to be on neutral ground.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:34 pm
Are you trying to claim a VFW isn’t “nuetral ground” for a veteran??!?
And no, I don’t know you work; I do know you claimed to be disabled and a patient at the VA.
You always have such a difficult time keepin’ yer story straight, dogbreath?
February 7th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
The fact that its the VFW YOU claim to belong to makes it not neutral ground.
Just because a person has a service connected disability doesn’t mean they can’t and/or don’t work. The vast majority of disabled vets do work. LOL, perhaps it’s you who needs to get their story straight.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
In other words, dogbreath, you receive “out-patient treatment” at the VA, as opposed to your original claim of bein’ a “patient”.
Do try to keep up.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:44 pm
ROFLMAO, of course I meant out-patient. I’m not in the psych ward like you are.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:45 pm
By the way moron, if I was inpatient, why would you think I’d be stupid enough to leave AMA just to meet a first class lying turd such as yourself?
February 7th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
“…why would you think I’d be stupid enough…
I based it on your past performance here, dogbreath.
You’re obviously a few bricks short of a load – although I’m guessin’ most of those bricks ended up in your fat ass and thunder thighs.
Putz.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
No, you’re the fat ass, remember, I’ve seen you.
And funny, I have 3 college degrees, graduated with a 3.80 GPA.
You on the other hand have a second rate golf shop, I bet you never even graduated from high school.
You make huge leaps of illogic, typical of several mental disorders. Hey Klinger, do you still wear those sequined bodices with the fleur-de-lis on them?
February 7th, 2008 at 7:55 pm
And funny, I have 3 college degrees,…
Yeah, “right”. Isn’t it amazing what you can buy on the internet these days?
Putz.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Wow, you mean I spent four years at the U of M Institute of Technology when I could have gotten on the internet? Want me to bring my diploma from IT too? Oh that’s right, you had no intention of meeting because you purposely picked work hours.
Just because you suck off the government tit and are non-productive doesn’t mean the rest of us are lazy ass liberals too.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
I don’t remember you offereing a counter location or time, putz.
Wait – that’s because you DIDN’T.
Do try to keep up.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
Gee Tommy, maybe it’s because I have to find a time thats good for me. Unlike you, I actually do things for veterans, and my whole weekend is booked doing things for veterans that will actually help them. Just because you have no life.
By the way, what the heck is “offereing” With spelling like that, you’re lucky if you made it out of grade school.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:06 pm
Well, when ya figure out a time let me know. Until you do, you’re a (cheney)in’ fraud, bootlicker.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Tell you what, I can scan it in and send it to Michael, provided of course he agrees.
And perhaps Klinger, if you don’t want to see a fraud, you should avoid mirrors.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:12 pm
Like I believe Michael???!?
FORLMAO!!!!!
February 7th, 2008 at 8:13 pm
Well, until you do, you’re a (cheney) fraud.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
Listen, dogbreath, you know you can easily verify my veterans status anytime you want by simply goin’ in to the Hopkins VFW and checkin’ the membership wall.
You don’t have to announce to anyone who you are, or why you’re there.
So my bona fides are beyond dispute.
You, however, are a (cheney)in’ FRAUD.
Putz.
February 7th, 2008 at 10:56 pm
only fucking shit, that was a lot you two!
February 8th, 2008 at 12:13 am
The other day, someone told me the difference between a democracy and a TwoPuttTommy’s democracy. It’s the same difference between a jacket and a straitjacket.
February 8th, 2008 at 3:13 am
Hey way asshole, I never claimed you weren’t a veteran. What I said is that youw were a REMF. I guess you aren’t bright enough to know that to be a REMF you have to be in the military thats how you get to be in the rear with the gear.
By the way fraud Tommy. I gave an easy way to see my DD214 without you even having to go anywhere but you refused. I knew you’d back out because you don’t want to be proved the lying asshole that you are. You want to be able to continue calling other veterans chickenhawks and other insulting names. That makes you a sadist just like Franken.
February 8th, 2008 at 7:35 am
Oh, I think you’ve established your “bona fides” beyond dispute alright, 2Pud.
I wonder if 2pud’s fellow VFW members have any idea just what an immature, big-mouthed, bulging asshole he is? I wonder how they might feel about him advertising his membership while making such an ass of himself.
Could 2Pud be an example of why the VFW has not been able to attract enough new members to keep afloat?
February 8th, 2008 at 8:50 am
“I gave an easy way to see my DD214 without you even having to go anywhere but you refused.”
Wrong again, dogbreath!
You gave MICHAEL a way to see your DD-214. Not me. You required that I trust Michael, which – of course – sent me ROFLMAO!!!!
“Facts are stupid things.”
Uncle Ronnie said it; dogbreath lives it.
February 8th, 2008 at 8:52 am
So, NotSoSwiftly – your memebership application was turned down.
Good. There’s no place in Veterans Organizations for those that march in Skokie.
February 8th, 2008 at 9:18 am
Honeydog, you do realize what a troll puddles is don’t you?
Good for the fat little fella if he was in the military. The years he served most likely he was drafted and did not go in on his own. He also reminds me of someone who has not done much since his service days and thus he go on and on about his service time. Kind of sad actually.
He tosses out the personal shit because he knows full well what a sad fat little man he is and quite honestly who could pound on that and not feel bad about it later.
Also Honeydog, it is not (Cheney)’n nothin’ It is (Franken)’n this or that.
We have a whole lot more footage of Frankenfraud swearing than Cheney. 
Now back to picking on Angry Al.
Get in his face, ask him if he ever paid back the boys and girls club, do what you can to ask the questions he does not want to answer. Nothing more fun than to watch Angry Al have to try and hold his temper. 
I encourage all to visit Angry Al and grill him the best you can. He is on full watch with his handlers and he is being asked to bite his angry tongue.
February 8th, 2008 at 10:18 am
I don’t think 2Pud is representative of VFW members, and I’m sure that he’s learned to keep his pie-hole shut when he’s there. But he is absolutely representative of the ignorant dolts that make up the majority of the membership of the Democrat party.
That is how, and why, a lying theif like Angry Al or a skulking rat like Matt Entenza or a pompus, out of control moron like Mike Hatch are ever seriously considered viable candidates…the Democrat rank and file take their measure and realize that they are just as hopeless as they are.
BK, according to Angry Al, he doesn’t owe the kids of the Gloria Wise boys and girls club a red cent.
According to Angry Al, because he received his share of the loot second hand he is entitled to keep it, and because he has hired a lawyer to deal with the legal fallout, he doesn’t give it a second thought anymore.
February 8th, 2008 at 10:48 am
You got typos, NotSoSwiftly.
Fortunatley for you, I’m here to help!
Corrected typos are marked by emphasis…
I think I’m representative of republiCons, and I’m sure that I’ve learned to open my pie-hole and repeat what republiCon party leadership has told me to,every chance I get. And I am absolutely representative of the ignorant dolts that make up the majority of the membership of the republiCon party, now that we’ve managed to run the RINO’s out.
That is how, and why, a lying theif like Duke Cunningham or a skulking rat like Bob Ney or a pompus, out of control moron like Jack Abramoff are ever seriously considered viable candidates…and party members of the republiCon LEADERSHIP. The republiCon rank and file lick leadership’s boots. It’s really rather pathetic, as we are just as hopeless as they are.
February 8th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’
“Ronald Reagan”
February 8th, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Hey Tommy, you moron. If Michael has it, he can send it to you. You do realize your email, which is required to post here, is viewable to him. LOL, there goes that lack of logical thinking on your part. Typical REMF thinking.
February 8th, 2008 at 5:21 pm
You know Tommy, if you’re trying to trash others for typos, perhaps you should proof read your own stuff.
“Fortunatley for you, I’m here to help!”
Fortunatley? ROFLMAO
February 8th, 2008 at 6:49 pm
No, dogbreath, I wasn’t “trashing for typos”; I was pointing out how easy that rhetoric was to be changed to an attack from the other side.
Of course, to realize that, one needs the ability to think analytically.
Which, of course, explains why you missed the point.
Putz.
Lick my jumpboots, leg.
February 9th, 2008 at 6:41 am
Tommy, you can lick my jumpboots too. Anybody can buy jump boots.
And also, you trash everybody all the time that doesn’t agree with you. Every post of yours is proof of that. But then, you think that’s ok. WHich proves you are the typical DEMONcrat who holds a double standard.
February 9th, 2008 at 9:01 am
Only two things fall of the sky folks. Bird shit and fools. And if puddles was airborne we all know he covers both as he is a chicken shit fool. Thank you and have a nice day.
February 9th, 2008 at 10:13 am
dogbreath, if you could actually articulate something with some semblance of fact, knowledge, and truth, you wouldn’t get stomped on.
Then again, you wouldn’t be bootlickin’ for the republiCons, either.
For the difference between a Republican, and a republiCon, link here:
http://www.edenprairienews.com/community/twoputttommy/republicon-or-republican-heres-difference
or, here:
http://www.mnblue.com/node/1021
***
Ladies and Gentlemen, many of you have heard the term “neo-conservativeâ€, and wondered what it meant. For the sake of discussion, let’s compare/contrast in a “republiCon†versus “Republican†method. For instance:
Ronald Reagan = Republican
George W. Bush = republiCon
Whether you liked President Reagan or not, whether you liked his politics or not, most reasonable people will agree that President Reagan was authentic, consistent, and principled. When his administration got caught up in the Iran-Contra Scandal, President Reagan spoke to the nation and accepted responsibility. What President Reagan said, is well-worth hearing again:
***
You, dogbreath, can lick my jumpboots.
February 9th, 2008 at 10:18 am
Say, Punky?
Go (cheney) yourself, ya (cheney)in’ bootlicker.
Here’s your ChickenHawk heros, in action:
http://www.toostupidtobepresident.com/shockwave/chickenhawks.htm
February 9th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Hey tommy, I’ve already read those at their websites, and I still think you are a full of BS DEMONCRAT who is so filled with the typical far left hatred.
And you can lick my jumpboots too there Tommy. Anybody can buy jump boots.
February 9th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Personally, I’m convinced the only thing airborn about 2pud is the stench of the load that dribbled out of his diapers into his surplus jump boots this morning.
February 10th, 2008 at 4:57 am
LOL Swiftee, that’s pretty much what I was thinking.
February 10th, 2008 at 8:38 am
And also, you trash everybody all the time that doesn’t agree with you. Every post of yours is proof of that. But then, you think that’s ok. WHich proves you are the typical DEMONcrat who holds a double standard.
Honeydog, it’s okay, I’m sure there’s tissues near you so you can dab your precious tears. TPT is such a horrible man, telling the unpleasant truth and pointing out those horrible facts. No wonder you cry and weep so.
Personally, I’m convinced the only thing airborn about 2pud is the stench of the load that dribbled out of his diapers into his surplus jump boots this morning.
And your reply HD
LOL Swiftee, that’s pretty much what I was thinking.
But wait
you trash everybody all the time that doesn’t agree with you….WHich proves you are the typical DEMONcrat
Do you see a little bit of a problem here. In less then 12 hours you turn your thinking completely around. Did the little mikey chip in your brain take a shock?
February 10th, 2008 at 9:30 am
Richard, I guess you need to go back to the typical Dick and Jane primers. TPT came on here trashing everybody immediately. He’s so crass he’s called other veterans chickenhawks even though they weren’t talking about the war. He tells people to F off constantly.
If you and he don’t like it tossed right back at you, perhaps you shouldn’t start the insult fest. Oh wait, I forgot, you think we should be doormats and just take it. ROFLMAO, typical HYPOCRIT!
February 10th, 2008 at 9:31 am
Oh wait, weren’t you the person whining about the Hiltery comments yet didn’t believe it when we said and PROVED your side had been doing it for years……….LOL, got get those tissues crybaby.
February 10th, 2008 at 10:29 am
Nope,, I don’t mind when you use the term Hitlery. Wasn’t me. Please try and track down that post. You see, when you use something like Hitlery or Osame,, er I mean Obama, it makes you look like idiots and I’m all for that. You cry and whine about TPT and then tell Tom Swift you’re all for it. Seems like your the one that doesn’t like your idiocy thrown back at cha.
February 10th, 2008 at 11:20 am
“Seems like your the one that doesn’t like your idiocy thrown back at cha.”
BINGO!!!
All Michael’s Children have been callin’ names and belittlein’ others for – well, since Michael started this site.
“Dittos, Rush!” is original thought, to them.
little stones is my favorite hypocrite; his typical post is:
that asshole
called me an asshole 
simply because I called him an asshole first 
what an asshole 
that asshole 
is for callin’ me an asshole 
after I called him an asshole 
But, I do admit I like that every time these (cheney)in’ republiCons see the word Cheney, they think (cheney).
That’s a nasty little trick I learned from The Professor, Newt “Is she well enough to serve, yet?” Gingrich.
Oh, and dogbreath?
“LICK MY JUMPBOOTS, LEG!!!”
February 10th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
I wasn’t mocking 2pud this time, nor did I point out the fact that he’s an asshole; the latter because he’s not.
In order to be a real asshole, you’ve got to have a rational point of reference from which to mount a a campaign of obnoxiousness.
I’m convinced that 2pud isn’t mature enough to be an asshole.
Instead, I was suggesting he’s a big mouthed, liar that uses bluster to cover his deep seated feelings of inadequacy and unworthiness.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:45 pm
And also, you trash everybody all the time that doesn’t agree with you. Every post of yours is proof of that. But then, you think that’s ok. WHich proves you are the typical DEMONcrat who holds a double standard.
There ya go Tom, from Honeydog’s keyboard to your eyes. Proof positive, you’re a DEMONcrat. Very clever that, DEMONcrat, it’s like Democrat only instead of just DEMO, you add an “n” and it becomes DEMON. Fabulous.
February 10th, 2008 at 3:22 pm
Folks: Let’s all tone it down a bit.
February 10th, 2008 at 3:33 pm
Try again Richard. Just keep reading Tommy’s threads. There is no trying to be civil to him. Every other word is F you, f’in putz. Nice hypocricy, and very typical of your side. And for the record, Tommy isn’t clever at all.
February 10th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Michael, I’ll tone it down about the same time Tommy stops using the F word, telling people they are chickenhawks, legs, etc.
February 10th, 2008 at 8:19 pm
Honey, do mean the Cheney word cuz I don’t see the most famous F word anywhere? Do you think there might be a point, maybe irony, maybe satire, to substituting Cheney for some as yet, un-named F word? And the literal definition of “chickenhawk” is someone who advocates for war but refused to serve when the opportunity presented itself for them. Cheney, Bush, Limbuagh, Rumsfeld, Wolfowicz, all advocated for war with Iraq, and never served themselves when they had the opportunity. I never served in the armed services but I think war is always a bad idea. McCain served admirably and so by defination is not a “chickenhawk”. See the differance.
February 11th, 2008 at 3:45 am
Tommy most certainly is using cheney in place of the F word, and it’s pretty apparent from his usage exactly what he means. Also, I’m fully aware what chickenhawk means, and in Tommy’s case, he’s calling me and several other VETERANS chickenhawks. Why do you think I’m complaining about his usage of it? Tommy doesn’t care if he insults other veterans.
By the way, satire is never funny. People who use satire, in my opinion, are sadists. Satire is used to diride and ridicle not only the person who used as the ‘tool’, but also those to whom the comments are directed.
February 11th, 2008 at 7:42 am
Ya know, dogbreath, I didn’t start bein’ uncivil, to you, until AFTER you were uncivil to me.
The fact that you can dish it, but can’t take it, proves what a phony you are.
re: “ChickenHawks” – Richard is correct; ;you are WRONG again.
re: “Tommy doesn’t care if he insults other veterans.” I believe you mean “Tom”, as in “Tom Swift, a/k/a “Swiftee”. Again, you object when what one of yours – NotSoSwiftly – does, is done back to you. This proves that in addition to bein’ a phony, you’re a hyptocrite, too.
re: “Tommy most certainly is using cheney in place of the F word,…” Yep. I sure the (cheney) am. ‘Cause I’ve noticed that there’s obviously no prohibition on usin’ the real (cheney) word, as I read it so (cheney)in’ often here, on MDE. And I read comments like “John F-ing Kerry”, too.
So, again, ya two-faced leg, I am not surprised that you have no objections when YOUR SIDE does it, but cry like a little baby/bully when what you do, is done back to you.
You’re pathetic, dogbreath.
Oh – and a putz, too.
Lick my jumpboots, leg.
February 11th, 2008 at 5:19 pm
BS Tommy. You were uncivil from the very first post I read. You are nothing but a massive liar.
No, it’s you who are the one insulting other veterans. I haven’t seen Swiftee call other veterans chickenhaws, leg, or any of the other insults you toss around with wild abandon. Again, a chickenhawk is NOT another veteran.
Again, there is no being civil to you. You’re just an ass who I’m sure hasn’t torn off a piece in years and that is what is causing you to be so surly.