Repeated for the sales benefit of James Janos’ latest book.

“HOWEVER, Ron Carey is NOT running for Senate. Al Franken is.”

Repeated for the benefit of el presidente.

He gives his blessing to some, and he tries to put the hex on others.

TwoPutt – so then those who ripped both Franken and Carey are what?

LL
# TwoPuttTommy Says:
May 7th, 2008 at 9:39 am

LL – “consistent”.:

Just checking because there are more than a few of us (whose names ARE NOT Carey) who have been writing about Al’s tax troubles who were also critical of things that Chairman Carey did.

HOWEVER, Ron Carey is NOT running for Senate. Al Franken is. That is where Michael is right and you again are wrong…..

LL

Geez, Tommy, you sure are on hypocritical, subject changing, moral relativity peddling GAS BAG!

I would really prefer not to get into the weeds with something like that! smoked Ron.

Nope – that just means republiCon Ron lacks any credibility to rip Franken for it.

And lest ye forget, it’s been republiCon Ron driving this story.

Glad we now have that issue out of the way.

They’re also in the minority of the Minority Party.

Watching republiCon Ron, at a podium, demanding Franken answer questions was surreal.

Here’s some cut ‘n pastes from a Strib Article, last June:

Carey didn’t explain why the retirement money wasn’t deposited promptly.

Carey did not directly respond to Tostenson’s claim that the employees’ money was used temporarily to cover party expenses.

And, there’s this:

In his memo, Tostenson also urged the party leaders to hold “those responsible for any illegal activity accountable, to minimize the Party’s political and legal liability.”

Carey did not directly answer questions about the alleged retaliation.

So, here we have republiCon Ron, not answering questions a year ago, now demanding someone else answer questions.

What a hypocrite.

If the bootlickers rippin’ Franken ripped republiCon Ron, they would be consistent.

But, they’re not, and they’re demonstratin’ again, the consistent inconsistency of the GreedOverPrinciples party.”

TwoPutt – so then those who ripped both Franken and Carey are what?

LL

http://www.ladieslogic.com/2008/05/accounting-accountability.html

It needs to be clarified that I was QUOTING a CPA. I am not, nor have I ever been an accountant. The article that I quoted was posted by a CPA on The American Thinker.

LL

Carey’s claiming paranoia, while Franken’s only blaming bad professional advice.

If the bootlickers rippin’ Franken ripped republiCon Ron, they would be consistent.

But, they’re not, and they’re demonstratin’ again, the consistent inconsistency of the GreedOverPrinciples party.

How republiCon Ron can claim Franken’s problems disqualify Franken to be elected, but his own problems allow him to run a major political party, only go to show GOPer hypocrisy – which will be a major issue in this campaign, especially when the GOPer candidate is that noted RINO, Senator Smokescreen.

Roz Kohls is a capable writer, and although she operates in a large and rural congressional district she probably didn’t just use the words “turnip” and “truck” by accident any more that I would spell her name upon hearing it – raws coals.

Oops, I forgot that they haven’t been able to defend him yet, so why would they start?

Al is going round and round the drain. When will he be done?

“But if Franken gets the nod and his tax irregularities sink him in the general election, few will then be praising JNP’s unwillingness to raise the matter now.” Gavin Sullivan’s Page, May 2008