« REMOVE THE FOOT FROM YOUR MOUTH, START EATING CROW, AND WIPE THE EGG OFF YOUR FACE | Home | NARN “THE FINAL WORD” TODAY FROM 3-5 P.M. AT THE MINNESOTA STATE FAIRGROUNDS »
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR TEAM FRANKEN AND THEIR SUPPORTERS ABOUT A REAL SCANDAL
By Michael B. Brodkorb | June 20, 2008
Hey, Team Franken supporters, how about answering a real scandal question: why did someone forge Franken’s doorman’s name on certified mail receipt?
The Coleman campaign answered the goofy questions and weirdo accusations that are flying around on the liberal pro-Franken blogs.
Of course, the folks who know who was on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza and are experts on the crash at Roswell and where Bigfoot can be found are the same ones who are talking about pixel size, the angles of Mrs. Coleman’s shoulders and mysterious shadows on the Coleman’s TV ad. They have even trotted out “expert†videographers – experts, I tell you! – who are aghast at the “trickery†of technology they know exists in the Coleman ad! (You’ll have to excuse me, I’m laughing a bit too hard to type right now!)
If you think about if for a moment, it’s kind of funny how many times the spot is being viewed for free online because of the conspiracy theorists.
Here’s a thought: how about he Franken folks tell Minnesotans who it was that knowingly forged Franken’s doorman’s name on official U.S. mail that was delivered to Franken’s New York home?
There sure isn’t any trickery surrounding that – unless, of course, Team Franken campaign is going to suggest the doorman is lying.
I know that my liberal friends enjoy attacking Senator Coleman’s wife – which I think is pretty sad and pathetic – but, maybe, just maybe they might call Team Franken and ask them this question:
“Mr. Franken, why would someone forge your doorman’s name on certified mail addressed to you?â€
“Mr. Franken, the signature sure looks like a signature of yours that has been on other legal documents bearing your name – do you have an explanation for that?â€
At some point I suppose the U.S.P.S. may actually look into the matter of someone engaging in fraud and forgery with the U.S. Mail system – and then we might get some answers. But hey, Team Franken could help out a lot by just finally answering the questions I have asked above.
My guess is that Franken, Scooter, Two-Putt Tommy and the rest of the gang are somewhere looking for the Loch Ness Monster and debating what kind of bait to use to catch Nessie!
Tags: Uncategorized
Topics: Uncategorized | 23 Comments »
23 Responses to “I HAVE A QUESTION FOR TEAM FRANKEN AND THEIR SUPPORTERS ABOUT A REAL SCANDAL”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
June 20th, 2008 at 11:00 PM
Actually, Michael, I’m wondering how you can say this, now:
I know that my liberal friends enjoy attacking Senator Coleman’s wife – which I think is pretty sad and pathetic – …
when you said this, just two years ago:
MIKE HATCH HAS DOUBLE-STANDARD ABOUT PROTECTING THE PRIVACY OF FAMILY MEMBERS #2
By Michael B. Brodkorb | July 30, 2006
I would take Mike Hatch’s concerns about the privacy of his daughters more seriously if he didn’t have a section of his website called “Hatch Familyâ€.
http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2006/07/30/mike-hatch-has-double-standard-about-protecting-the-privacy-of-family-members-2/
So, tell me, Michael – why exactly did Laurie scrub her website, which is strictly commercial, of the shameless shilling of her senatorial hubby?
And why is that so wrong now, when just two years ago it wasn’t?
June 20th, 2008 at 11:22 PM
So this was a semi-real scandal?
June 21st, 2008 at 12:31 AM
MBB: “My guess is that Franken, Scooter, Two-Putt Tommy and the rest of the gang are somewhere looking for the Loch Ness monster and debating what kind of bait to use to catch Nessie!”
——————————————-
My NOT SO WILD GUESS is that Al Franken, Andy Barr, and Two-Putt Tommy are NOT somewhere looking for the Loch Ness monster and are NOT debating what kind of bait to use to catch Nessie.
Who put the cockelburr on top of your saddle?
June 21st, 2008 at 1:05 AM
Three and a half hours later and their heads are still reeling.
“Yeah but, yeah but…Halliburton! Uh….Cheney…uh…republiCons!…uhm, ahh, ummm…”
or in the case of their most learned representative:
” adlkangonaqbgoanobnaebgkanglkZJfaeurt0aigaertioq]rigJSg’lkjqaerghopizaflghkanjrgtja]0wrpghjPZSfgjp
aRjghparjgpajrgp
aORjgaoerjhpaejrghpoakjfg
;zlkdf;laskdfg;ladhajdhkajhg
;aglkadhjqpothoyiaertyoiae]rtpoiaprtiqo]rityq9t61035496834kjhgskdfhnsdnbhaelkyqe5yjh;djgbs;gdfhjpq45jh…
…
algkjqargijpqaroitaortgarogi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
June 21st, 2008 at 6:20 AM
So basically they just refuse to answer the questions. Deflect, dodge, weave – but never, ever answer the real questions.
Typical conspiracy nut liberals.
June 21st, 2008 at 7:18 AM
Deflect, dodge, weave – but never, ever answer the real questions. “
Well, that technique’s been mastered by the republiCons, but I’ve been paying attention!
Doncha hate it, when what your side does is done back to ya?
June 21st, 2008 at 8:37 AM
average joe,
Yep. That’s pretty much it.
June 21st, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Remind me again what questions the lefties aren’t answering?
Seems to me, the question was, did Norm chroma his “wife” into his commercial.
I don’t see why we should have to answer that one.
So, if deflection is the name of the game, you are winning, quite handily.
June 21st, 2008 at 10:49 AM
You serious Tommy? When has the Left ever answered a question with a straight answer?
JHC, you are truly pathetic.
As for you Leroy, you stupid sonofabitch, since you’re among the deranged fools leveling ridiculous accusations, it’s pretty much entirely on you to prove your case.
Lies and libel won’t cut it. But I know that that’s yours and Tommy’s trade.
June 21st, 2008 at 11:53 AM
Chestnut, thank you for proving, once again, that the “Family Values” republiCons have no family values, but are indeed Cons.
June 21st, 2008 at 1:49 PM
I think this whole Laurie Coleman thing is kinda ridiculous, and the idea that Al Franken forged his doorman’s signature for some ‘unknown’ reason is also pretty ridiculous.
I think there are more important things to be concerned with. The economy is shit, we got two wars with soldiers dying every day, gas is 4 dollars a freakin gallon, and ya’ll are arguing about camera angles and far fetched mail fraud conspiracies.
Yikes, bush league…….
June 21st, 2008 at 2:09 PM
Since when does the person making the allegation have to prove ANYTHING?
The fact that you would make that suggestion on this site makes it one of the dumbest things you have ever said. (and that is saying something).
June 21st, 2008 at 8:56 PM
Leroy Jenkins Says:
“Since when does the person making the allegation have to prove ANYTHING?”
Seriously?
So from now on it’s guilty until proven innocent?
OK then, I say Al Franken eats kittens. I don’t have to prove it, you have to prove he doesn’t….go.
June 21st, 2008 at 9:38 PM
The Audacity of HYPE [rhymes with TRIPE],
The Playboy uses a “Bunny Rabbit,” Mr. Green-Jeans.
Perhaps Captain Kangaroo eats “Kitty-Cats,” along with a joey or two?
Perhaps Representative Laura Brod eats: cows [McDonald's], sheep, pigs, goats, deer, chickens, ducks, geese, pheasants, etc.
June 21st, 2008 at 11:42 PM
The lib-nuts on this site would be funny if- no, on second thought, they’re just stupid.
June 21st, 2008 at 11:48 PM
Finally, a someone agrees with what I have been saying all along:
Laurie Coleman is HOT!
http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=1630
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:43 AM
Does Representative Laura Brod eat hot dogs?
If she lives on a farm, she probably has a fairly good idea what is some hot dogs.
For Audacity of HYPE [rhymes with Tripe] to write that Al Franken eats kittens [kitty-cats], without thinking that if Laurie & Norm Coleman at hot dogs they very well could have eaten some brains and other so called not commonly eaten parts of animals.
The Truth may write that it is stupid but perhaps the Truth should tour packing plants.
[South St. Paul Packers, Green Bay Packers, etc.]
June 22nd, 2008 at 9:39 PM
There used to be some normal respectable libs around here with coherent thoughts—
helloooooo is anybody there??
June 22nd, 2008 at 10:33 PM
shozzy: “There used to be some ‘normal respectable libs’ around here with coherent thoughts-”
helloooooo is anybody there??
—————————————–
“HELLO Goodbye” by the Beatles I can’t remember the year. Then there are also the Lennon-McCartney lyrics: “Is there ANYBODY going to listen to my story…” from the song Girl. I can’t remember the year for that either.
The Kinks sang, “A Well-RESPECTED Man,” and also used the word “conservatively.”
I probably could keep going for awhile but, I’ll stop here.
June 22nd, 2008 at 10:39 PM
Might as well stop, El P; it’s not like shozzy – bein’ a republiCon – is any good at “connecting the dots” anyway….
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:33 AM
Wow.
Three days in and a collective 13 posts later, Tommy, EP, etal have yet to get within a mile of the original topic of this thread.
You were asked a direct question, boys.
June 23rd, 2008 at 11:09 AM
Deflect, dodge, weave – but never, ever answer the real questions. “
Well, that technique’s been mastered by the republiCons, but I’ve been paying attention!
Doncha hate it, when what your side does is done back to ya?
Somewhere, someone told leftybloggers (and the commenters the crabble about beneath their feet) that “I know you are, but what am I?” is a solid debate tactic.
June 24th, 2008 at 8:12 AM
Well, I’m from North Dakota, and we have Kent Conrad, the squeaky clean Democrat…..oh, wait….nevermind….