…because bootlickers don’t pay attention.

The fact of the matter is the misAdministration of Bush The Lesser believes they can not only take your guns, they can take you, your wife, your kids, your guns, and any other property they want, and YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THE GOVERNMENT’S ACTIONS IN COURT.

NONE.

You bootlickers are missing the point.

No surprise there.

“Democrats that own guns – like me! – understand that SEVEN of NINE Justices on SCOTUS were appointed by GOPer Presidents; yet it was a 5-4 decision.”

You keep repeating that like it helps your “argument” in some way. It doesn’t, and it makes you appear dull. Perhaps it is not only an appearance, but if it there is some meat to this argument then please reveal it.

Obama is seen as a danger to gun ownership because:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/06/AR2008040601652.html
http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm
http://www.sportsmenforobama.org/content/view/14/27/
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/dem-hopefuls-mostly-mum-on-gun-2007-04-17.html

Just because you are one of the folks he termed as “bitter” and that you “cling” to your guns for respite apparently doesn’t make you very interested in BHO’s opinions and history on the subject of gun law. Another check for you in the “dull” category. :-/

Say, rePete?

A bunch of us Democrats own handguns. Some of us several. Like me.

Next time, ask your teacher to proof your rantings. If she’s busy, maybe the PlayGroundLady will help. Failing that, you can always ask your friendly ShortBusDriver.

Next year, er, ‘scuse me, “next grade” (you been in this one, what – 3 years now? 4?), maybe they’ll teach ya how to spell-check….

Grow the (cheney) up, will ya, rePete?

I’m interested to hear Tommy’s outrage.

Thank you, thank you, thank you! It’s so nice of a bootlicker like you, to say something like that.

And ya can’t win; when the Lessons Of Newt “Is She Well Enough To Divorce Yet?” Gingrich are turned against the forces of evil (which everybody knows is today’s GreedOverPrinciples party), even Turdblossom can’t save those that lick the boots of Boy Blunder And The Plunderers.

But, really, “Smokescreen” and “(cheney)” will be my lasting contributions.

And I’m humbled to be able to humiliate you, here on MDE.

I can tell by your sharp wit and fact based arguments that you are a real intellect. Thanks for the entertainment again.

God bless the patriot in this race, Senator McCain!

It’s because the bootlickers were TOLD to be happy.

And bein’ good little bootlickers, they do as they are told.

But, to put it in perspective, they also believe Boy Blunder is doin’ a good job.

Registration, trainings every six months, psychological exam…This is good for us Democrats.

Chestnut, devils advocate, who gives a shit what you think?

And now just a general response. Gun control is an issue rarely brought up and is probably towards the bottom of issues people care about. Gun control was not an issue in 2004, it wont be now. Although, this decision could bring it back so I guess I could be wrong. We’ll just have to wait see, but if people care about gun control over the economy, the Iraq War, and our energy crisis, well then that’s pathetic.

Bootlickers will ignore what Alito said, even though he is one o’ the rightwingnut’s favorites, Alito believes gun rights can be restricted.

So, basically, what we have here is a bunch o’ bootlickers that will never be happy, biotchin’ and whinin’ ’cause they’ve been told to.

And they’ll try to make “guns” a campaign issue; they’ll fail as the electorate understands these bootlickers are only using “guns” as a wedge.

Their tricks are old. And come November, they’ll be relegated to Permanent Minority Status.

The lack of logic…wow…just wow.

Barak Obama isn’t change. Or if he is, it’s “change” that works for nobody, and “change” we can live without.

What a goddam charlatan.

Do you something we don’t?

Michael, rightwingnuts have smeared Obama’s religion; now you’re going after guns. How soon until he gets smeared as a homo?