Search


MDE on Twitter
follow MDETweets at http://twitter.com

The MDE FILES:

  • Al Franken
  • Ashwin Madia
  • Mark Ritchie
  • Mike Hatch
  • Daily Reads - Minnesota

  • Blogs for Norm!
  • dreckless
  • Franken Cover-Up
  • Freedom Dogs
  • Kool Aid Report
  • Let Freedom Ring Blog
  • Nihlist in Golf Pants
  • Party of Pawlenty
  • Saint Paulicy
  • SD 63
  • Truth vs. The Machine

    Daily Reads - National

  • America Weakly
  • Blogometer – National Journal
  • Cost of Democrats (NRSC)
  • Drudge Report
  • GOP Bloggers
  • Hotline On Call
  • Hugh Hewitt
  • Insta Pundit
  • Little Green Footballs
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Political Wire
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Red State
  • The Thicket

    Television

  • KARE 11 (NBC)
  • KMSP 9 (FOX)
  • KSTP 5 (ABC)
  • WCCO 4 (CBS)
  • WFTC 29 (UPN)

    Radio
    Radio

  • Air America Minnesota
  • AM1500 KSTP
  • KTLK The FM News Talk
  • The Patriot
  • The Patriot II
  • WCCO 830

    Newspapers

  • City Pages
  • Pioneer Press
  • Pulse of the Twin Cities
  • Star Tribune
  • The Rake


    MSM Blogs

  • Capitol Letters – Matt Stolle
  • Mary Lahammer (TPT)
  • MPR Polinaut
  • Pioneer Press – The Political Animal
  • Pioneer Press: City Hall Scoop
  • The Big Question (Star Tribune)
  • The Fix (Washington Post)

    Liberal Blogs

  • Minnesota Lawyer Blog
  • PoliticsLaw Blog

    Liberal Links

  • A Bluestem Prairie
  • Across the Great Divide
  • Backbone Minnesota
  • Blanked Out
  • Blue man in a Red district
  • Blue Ox
  • Broken Nails
  • Capitol Brew-haha
  • Centrisity
  • Chris Truscott
  • City Pages Blotter
  • Common Sense Minnesota
  • Craig’s Site
  • Curly Tales of War Pigs
  • Dan Weinand
  • Democratic Underground – Minnesota
  • DFLSenate
  • Dump John Kline
  • Eleventh Avenue South
  • Evil Bobby
  • Lakeville Dad
  • Lefty Blogs – Minnesota
  • Liberal Media Elite
  • Lutefisk Liberal
  • Midwest Values Pac
  • Minnesota Blue
  • Minnesota Brown
  • Minnesota Central
  • Minnesota Politics
  • Minnesota Republican Watch
  • Minntelect
  • Minvolved!
  • Mississippifarian
  • MN Publius
  • mnblue
  • mnpACT!
  • Moderate Left
  • New Patriot
  • North Star Politics
  • Norwegianity
  • Odd Thoughts and Politics
  • Rambling from the North
  • The Life Fantastic
  • The Loyal Opposition
  • The Power Liberal
  • Tild
  • Truth Surfer
  • Twin Cities Daily Liberal
  • U-DFL Blog
  • Vox Verax
  • Yowling from the Fencepost


    DBrigham Design



  • « WILL LORD FARIS BE INVITED TO FARM FEST? #2 | Home | WILL LORD FARIS BE INVITED TO FARM FEST? #4 »

    WILL LORD FARIS BE INVITED TO FARM FEST? #3

    By Michael B. Brodkorb | July 23, 2008

    Former U.S. Senator Dean Barkley responded to my e-mail about the upcoming Farm Fest debate:

    “I have been invited and will attend.  I have no problem with multiple candidates.”

    I am still waiting for a response from Team Franken and Jack Uldrich’s campaign. It may turn out that only Team Franken has a problem with Lord Faris participating in the debate.

    Please check back to Minnesota Democrats Exposed for more information on this developing story.

    Topics: Uncategorized | 8 Comments »

    8 Responses to “WILL LORD FARIS BE INVITED TO FARM FEST? #3”

    1. Leroy Jenkins Says:
      July 23rd, 2008 at 8:24 pm

      Will you also be calling on Ole Savior and Dick Franson to be included?

    2. ansel Says:
      July 23rd, 2008 at 8:56 pm

      if norm accepts the debate, franken would be forced to attend.

      assuming franken attends, it would good for norm to make the other dems looks better than franken so that franken has to utilize more resources to fight his way through the primary.

    3. Leroy Jenkins Says:
      July 23rd, 2008 at 9:17 pm

      Stephen Williams is the endorsed candidate from the Independence Party. I assume since Barkley and Uldrich are on Michael’s wish list, he will also be demanding that Williams be included. And the Constitution Party has endorsed James Niemacki. I assume he must be included.

      And what about the rest of the major party candidates? Since the bar is no longer going to be set at endorsed candidates, where do you draw the line?

      There are seven Independence Party candidates. Do they all get to come? There are also seven Democrats. Fairness dictates that all seven should be allowed to debate. And we all know there are not one, but TWO republicans on the ballot, as well as a yet to be endorsed Libertarian.

      I would be curious to see how Michael draws the line to include Barkley, Uldrich and Farris, but exclude endorsed candidates like Williams and Niemacki.

    4. Andrew Says:
      July 23rd, 2008 at 10:16 pm

      It’s because Michael is full of it. Anyone can clearly see Franken is the nominee and by playing up a bunch of bullshit sexism crap because he won’t debate a woman who has no chance to beat him, it’s suddenly a huge problem. The Republican party disgusts me.

    5. Tom Says:
      July 23rd, 2008 at 10:22 pm

      It seems most people think major party is an ambiguous term. The fact is that in Minnesota it is not ambiguous, it has a specific meaning, and no the Constitution party is not a major party. In order to qualify for major party status in Minnesota, any one of the party’s candidates must have received at least 5% of the vote in a state wide election. This means that the Republicans, Democrats, and the Independence party are all Major parties in Minnesota. I know the Green Party used to be a Major party in Minnesota, thanks to Ralph Nader, but I don’t think they are any more.

    6. Chestnut Says:
      July 23rd, 2008 at 10:31 pm

      Leroy has displayed his retardation once more!

      “Stephen Williams is the endorsed candidate from the Independence Party. I assume since Barkley and Uldrich are on Michael’s wish list, he will also be demanding that Williams be included. And the Constitution Party has endorsed James Niemacki. I assume he must be included.”

      None of those are “major party candidates” by any stretch of the imagination.

      And what about the rest of the major party candidates? Since the bar is no longer going to be set at endorsed candidates, where do you draw the line?

      What does “endorsement” have to do with anything? Why should anyone draw a line at “endorsed” candidates. A DFL endorsement isn’t worth shit, really. Franken is endorsed, but he hasn’t won a goddam thing. Or do you really think this should just be easy for that ass clown?

      Leroy Jenkins: Dumb as a bag of Tommy Johnson’s shit.

    7. ansel Says:
      July 23rd, 2008 at 10:50 pm

      i am surprised that you all have not seen the obvious: who get’s invited to a debate? whomever the sponsors ask.

      in this case if the farm fest sponsors want to invite 3 or 10 candidates that is up to them. it is a private organization and they can damn well do what they want. i believe that would probably be covered under the right of association or disassociation.

      if candidates do not want to participate that is up to them, based on how they see the risk/reward possibilities.

      then, we as spectators can weigh in if farm fest is doing a bad/good job, the candidates and good/bad, etc. most likely everybody will learn from the experience.

    8. Leroy Jenkins Says:
      July 23rd, 2008 at 11:43 pm

      Chestnut-

      So you agree with Barkley and Williams both being included, but Uldrich being excluded?

    Comments