« COLEMAN FOR U.S. SENATE PRESS RELEASE: “GAO REPORT RAISES NEW QUESTIONS ABOUT FRANKEN’S CORPORATION: IS AL FRANKEN PART OF THE PROBLEM OF THOSE NOT PAYING TAXES SINCE AT LEAST 1998″ | Home | BREAKING NEWS: SENATE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS WON’T SUPPORT MARK OLSON IN PRIMARY; OLSON WON’T “BE WELCOMED” AS MEMBER OF CAUCUS SHOULD HE WIN ELECTION »
ON REPRESENTATIVE MARK OLSON’S ENDORSEMENT BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN SD 16
By Michael B. Brodkorb | August 13, 2008
Representative Mark Olson’s booking photo
Minnesota Democrats Exposed is blog dedicated to a truthful discussion on the activities, statements, and tactics of Minnesota Democrats. Since I started Minnesota Democrats Exposed as my personal blog back in July 2004, I have proudly published over 6,000 posts exposing the bad-behavior and conduct of Democrats in Minnesota. But today I turn my attention to a situation of concern to me inside my own party.
Last Thursday evening, Representative Mark Olson was endorsed by the SD 16 Republicans to run for the Minnesota Senate in SD 16. The state senator in SD 16, Senator Betsy Wergin, was appointed by Governor Pawlenty to the to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission in July. Representative Olson, who currently represents HD 16B in the Minnesota House of Representatives, was not endorsed for re-election because he was convicted of domestic assault in 2007. Former Secretary of State Mary Kiffmeyer was endorsed on the second ballot over Representative Olson.
When I heard that Representative Olson had been endorsed, I was sick to my stomach. I immediately wished that I had published my personal concerns about Representative Olson last week. After he lost the Republican endorsement to Kiffmeyer, I thought Representative Olson would also lose the endorsement contest to his rival, Alison Krueger. After being convicted of domestic assault and admitting in a speech the he brought “dishonor and disrepute” to the Minnesota House of Representatives, I didn’t think Representative Olson would be endorsed by the SD 16 Republicans. I was wrong.
Sadly, Being Convicted of Domestic Abuse May Help Representative Olson’s Political Career
If Representative Olson had not been arrested, charged, tried and convicted of domestic assault, he would have likely been endorsed for re-election to the Minnesota House of Representatives. Due to his legal problems and if he wins in November, Representative Olson will be getting a job promotion. Due to his legal problems, instead of representing just HD 16B, Olson could represent both HD 16A and 16B in the Minnesota Senate. Due to his legal problems, instead of being one of 134 members of the House of Representatives, Olson could become one of 67 members of the Minnesota Senate.
It is a embarrassing and sad fact, but if Representative Olson wins in November, he will become a more influential member of the Minnesota Legislature because he was arrested, charged, tried and convicted of domestic assault.
The Political Reaction to the Votes of The Override Six vs. The Legal Problems of Representative Mark Olson
Back in February, six Republican members of the House of Representatives voted to override Governor Pawlenty’s veto of the DFL transporation bill. I quickly labeled these wayward Republicans as the “Override Six” and was highly critical of their vote on my blog and on my radio show. I published posts about members of the Override Six losing Republican endorsement and being punished by the House Republican Caucus for their votes. The majority of the conservative blogs in Minnesota expressed great frustration with the Override Six.
But while I passionately disagree with a vote to override Governor Pawlenty veto of the DFL transportation bill, the Override Six voted their conscience. The Override Six cast a vote in favor of legislation they believed benefited their districts and the state of Minnesota. The Override Six weren’t arrested, charged, tried or convicted of anything - yet some were punished more for their vote of conscience than was Representative Olson, who was convicted last year of domestic assault. While Representative Olson may be getting a job promotion due to his legal problems, the Override Six are political outcasts.
To be honest, I’m saddened that some in my political party only judge elected officials by the votes they cast in office and not how they conduct themselves in office. We seem to value ideological purity over being law-abiding citizens. We should value both. From the perspective of gaining political influence and responsibility, crime does pay for Representative Olson.
What the Democrats Can Say About Representative Olson
In November 2006, Representative Olson was charged with two counts of domestic assault, but convicted of one charge of “domestic assault by intending to cause bodily harm or death”:
“The jury of five men and one woman, which deliberated for about three hours, convicted Olson of domestic assault by intending to cause fear of bodily harm or death. He was acquitted of intentionally inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily harm. Sentencing was set for Aug. 8.” Source: Associated Press, July 14, 2007
It is a statement of fact that Representative Olson was convicted of domestic assault. Some of the most damaging statements about Representative Olson came from his wife Heidi. Mrs. Olson testified that she was “afraid of being killed” by Representative Olson:
“She said Olson said she had ruined his life and he had nothing to lose. She was standing in his way as he measured the back of their garage for a planned addi-tion and he pushed her down, she said. ‘I was afraid of being killed,’ she said.” Source: Star Tribune, July 12, 2008
Mrs. Olson testified that she had been assaulted before by Representative Olson and that he threw Bibles at her:
“Heidi Olson, who is 5-foot-10 and 200 pounds, said her husband, who is 5-foot-9 and 180 pounds, physically assaulted her three times before the November incident, once bruising her arms by repeatedly throwing two Bibles at her in a rage. The jury was shown pictures of her arm bruises.” Source: Star Tribune, July 12, 2008
In an interview with the Star Tribune, Mrs. Olson said she needed to “protect [her] family” from Representative Olson:
“Reconcile? No way, said Heidi Olson, adding that she hopes their four-year marriage will end Thursday at a family court hearing. She said ‘it was odd’ to see his response on television after the verdict:
He emerged from the courtroom ’smiling like he had won an election, and wanted to forgive me and love me and take me back. I need to protect my family from Mark.” Source: Star Tribune, July 21, 2007
From sources I spoke with regarding this post, Representative Olson and his wife have since reconciled. While I hope that Representative Olson and his wife have a healthy and positive relationship, the fact the she forgiven Representative Olson doesn’t influence my opinion that he shouldn’t get a job promotion for being convicted of domestic assault.
Representative Olson has voluntarily participated in and has also been order by a judge to undergo counseling for his abusive behavior:
“Olson, a Republican from Big Lake who was convicted of misdemeanor assault in July, also must pay nearly $400 in fines and court costs, attend a 12-week behavior-oriented workshop and have no contact with his wife, Heidi Olson. District Judge Alan Pendleton stayed a 90-day jail term.” Source: Star Tribune, August 17, 2007
“In 1997, Olson agreed to undergo counseling to better communicate with House staff after an incident in which he slammed a typewriter on a desk. He attended two sessions and there has been no indication of subsequent incidents, a House Republican spokeswoman said.” Source: Star Tribune, November 14, 2006
Republican officials I spoke last evening are convinced that Representative Olson running for the Minnesota Senate in SD 16 increasing the chances that Democrats target HD 16A and 16B. Olson has the potential to drag down the entire Republican ticket in the area. I’m not claiming that Representative Olson can’t win in November, but rather I’m expressing my disgust that he may win in November and become a more influential member of the Minnesota Legislature because he was arrested, charged, tried and convicted of domestic assault.
My Questions for the Leadership of the Senate Republican Caucus
I proudly worked for the Senate Republican Caucus from January 1999 until March 2002 and I still have friends who work there today. But friendships aside, the leadership at the Senate Republican Caucus needs to publicly comment on the endorsement of Representative Olson. I have two main questions:
1. Does the leadership of the Senate Republican Caucus support the Republican-endorsed candidate, Representative Mark Olson, for the Minnesota Senate in SD 16?
2. If Representative Olson actually wins the election, will the leadership of the Senate Republican Caucus allow Senator Olson to become a member of the caucus?
The leadership of the Senate Republican Caucus should answer these questions about Representative Olson now and not wait until after the elections. While Representative Olson is the endorsed candidate, the Senate Republican Caucus is a separate political entity and they could decide to support Allison Krueger, who ran against Representative Olson for the Republican endorsement.
I Respect the Endorsement Process, But Representative Olson Should Not Have Been Endorsed
I don’t expect elected officials to be perfect - they’re only human. But as with other DFL elected officials and candidates that I have exposed on my blog, there is a pattern and clear record of Representative Olson behaving badly. In his own words, Representative Olson admitted “bringing dishonor and disrepute” to the Minnesota House of Representatives, yet he may be getting a job promotion.
I appreciate that the Republican Party of Minnesota is a party of local control, as I am Republican activist in my local area. I respect the endorsement process, but Representative Olson should not have been endorsed by the SD 16 Republicans to run for the Minnesota Senate. Since Allison Krueger’s name will still appear on the primary ballot, I’m suggesting that she strongly consider running against Representative Olson. Those who agree with my post should contact Allison and encourage her to run.
Finally, this will likely be my only post today on Minnesota Democrats Exposed. To be blunt, I need to shine a light on my party today instead of focusing on Minnesota Democrats.
Topics: Uncategorized |
August 13th, 2008 at 1:42 am
I was a little bit surprised by Olson’s endorsement myself but to be honest, it was only a little bit of a surprise.
Of course, my gut feeling is that you have some ties that I don’t know about regarding Allison Krueger. I’m going to put that aside and try my hardest to trust that you’re posting about this because it is the right thing to do despite the fact you’ve given me zero reason to trust you with anything else.
If the facts are as balanced as how you present them, I also hope that Allison Krueger runs and that Mark Olson never runs for public office again.
August 13th, 2008 at 2:23 am
Good for you, Michael. The party needs to stand for something and this was a sad case of failing to step back and look at the big picture.
August 13th, 2008 at 7:00 am
Aaron: I have never met Allison Krueger, I have never spoke with Allison Krueger. I couldn’t pick her out of a line-up. This post is about Representative Olson. Your “gut” has failed you one again. I’m just a Republican activist, speaking out on my personal blog.
August 13th, 2008 at 7:21 am
What makes me sick is that the endorsement reflects poorly on the good people throughout the rest of the MNGOP. The people of SD 16 should be ashamed for their endorsement, which brings disrepute on all of us.
August 13th, 2008 at 7:42 am
let me guess: Quentin from Zimmerman led the charge to endorse Olson….what a joke.
Glad you made this post, Michael. This is very embarassing for the GOP.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:00 am
Embarrassing is an understatement. Everybody knows that the BPOU up in SD16 is controlled by a bunch of crazies. The primary election serves as a check on the caucus system if it runs out of control. Now is that time. Run, Allison Run!
August 13th, 2008 at 8:12 am
For all I’ve disagreed with some of your points, sir, I’m proud of you for posting this one. Way to stand up for the truth. Very well done.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:12 am
Thank you for this post Michael, I really appreciate it.
One of the things that typically distinguishes Conservatives and Republicans from the other side is that they hold their own accountable. I suppose it is in part because of the left’s welfare state mentality that accountability and responsibility are secondary values (at best).
But the party of accountability, personal responsibility and consequence almost never rewards this kind of behavior. So what went wrong in this endorsement?
This cycle, we have seen the left turn its back on a strong, liberal woman running for president in favor of an inexperienced, shallow (but articulate) man who simply isn’t ready for the job.
This cycle, we have seen the left turn its back on a woman state Senator primed to be a tough candidate in a swing congressional district in favor of a man who it appears will say anything it takes to win.
This cycle, the DFL endorsed a man for the US Senate who has joked about such a serious topic as rape and has a history of belittling women. And now his supporters ignore a strong, well connected woman opponent as though they believes she should just get back in the kitchen.
Republicans in Minnesota had a real case to be made to start closing the gender gap.
What do they do to make that a reality? Endorse a convicted wife beater over an apparently well qualified woman?
You are right Michael, we should feel sick to our stomachs.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:24 am
If the BPOU in 16 had its house in order, they would work to see that Rep. Olson and his family get the help they obviously need instead of enabling his narcissistic and destructive abuse pattern.
Is this the republican Party in Minnesota?
If Allison is willing to run for the good of the party, I will help with dollars and shoe leather. That’s something many would do who maybe have been too turned off to help in recent years.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:40 am
I was at the endorsing convention. I had the privilege of nominating Alison. She’s a fine person with everything any conservative could want in a candidate. Her willingness to run on such short notice is typical of her servant attitude. She’s better off for the experience and will certainly stay engaged in the local grassroots political process.
The characterization that the Minnesota GOP endorsed Mark Olson is indeed what the left will gravitate toward. In reality SD16 endorsed Olson. More specifically, the folks in SD16 who bothered to show up for the special endorsing convention. Mark & Heidi deserve credit for winning at the endorsing game. A game they know well and executed deftly last Thursday. They rallied support from within their network of friends in and out of the district and they won.
Alison signed a pledge to not actively campaign against the endorsement. So did Mark. That’s a pretty significant commitment and definitely shows respect for the will of the delegates. I do not expect Alison to waffle on that pledge. Her integrity is far more precious to her than a senate seat. In the unlikely event that she passively wins the primary, since her name is indeed still on the ballot, well, then she has a whole new situation to deal with.
Your concerns about the ammunition provided the left because of this unusual development are credible. No doubt Mark will be attacked. The shrapnel will possibly impact the House candidates. I guess if there’s going to be a food fight there aren’t better equipped candidates than Sondra Erickson and Mary Kiffmeyer to weather the storm.
Mark Olson unfortunately did not qualify for public subsidy. In the rush to assemble delegates for the endorsing convention, he failed to raise the minimum required to activate the share of public money. That’s $15-20K he will not have in his coffers to wage battle against Democrat Lisa Fobbe.
My personal regret about the endorsing convention is not so much the outcome as the way it was conducted. Senator Betsy Wergin served SD16 honorably. She was not allowed to address the convention. She was not even allowed to be seated as a delegate even though she was a delegate! Her family and friends were not allowed to attend as guests. That’s just bush-league. Betsy deserves an apology and local leaders need to raise the bar of behavior in their ranks.
The opportunities we have to engage new people in the political process are easily wasted when well-intentioned people in positions of real or perceived power act like kindergartners fighting over paste. We all deserve better in our quest to elect effective conservatives.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:43 am
“One of the things that typically distinguishes Conservatives and Republicans from the other side is that they hold their own accountable. “
True. The GOP rarely (if ever) holds their own accountable. If they did, for instance, Colonel Repya would be the Chair of the RPM, not republiCon Ron.
And don’t forget the republiCons in congress, covering up for Mark “What’s Your IM Name, Little Page?” Foley, purely for partisan, electoral purposes.
One of the most hypocritical pieces ever put out was one of John “Semper Never” Kline’s franked campaign propaganda, er, ’scuse me, “constituent communications” pieces that showed a little kid in front of a computer; meanwhile, Denny Hastert and Co were scrambling to protect themselves and their party ’cause the guy THEY put in charge of the Congressional Page Program, was hittin’ on pages.
Say, Kline? You worried about the perverts, hittin’ on kids? HE’S A MEMBER OF YOUR OWN PARTY, AND YOU GUYS PUT HIM IN CHARGE.
Steph, you are correct: the GOP routinely, and always, fails to hold it’s own accountable; it’s good to see Michael finally comin’ around.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:56 am
It’s nice to see a Republican stand up to his Party when he feels it is necessary. I only wish some Dems could do that in the Senate race.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:02 am
Tom Rukavina, the Chair of the House Higher Education Committee is a Democrat and convicted drunk driver. He has faced no punishment from his caucus for his behavior.
James Metzen, the President of the Senate is a Democrat and convicted drunk driver. He has faced no punishment from his caucus for his behavior.
Phyllis Kahn is a Democrat and convicted thief whose crimes were committed in the act of campaigning against a sitting legislator. She has faced no punishment from her caucus for her behavior.
In each case, their positions of legislative authority were granted or re-confirmed AFTER being convicted of their respective crimes.
Minnesota Democrats have no standing to criticize Republicans for how they handle convicted criminals within their party. NONE.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:02 am
Minnesota Democrats Exposed has now officially lost it’s innocence.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:09 am
Tommy’s off his meds again.
Great post Michael. Olson is an extreme embarrassment.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:20 am
As this site proves over and over again, apologies don’t matter in politics. Once a mistake has been made, that mistake is a political liability for life.
So, while I could just shut up and join the rimjob brigade in telling you how great it is that you momentarially found principles,one fact remains. You, Michael Brodkorb, have almost singlehandedly destroyed the idea of political redemption, and as such, you deserve no slack when it comes to apologizing for the sins of your party.
The Minnesota Republican Party has openly announced that it is willing to offer promotions to members who beat their wives if it increases their chance at victory. That is more reprehensible than anything that Al Franken has ever said or done.
And you had better believe that Minnesota will be offered many opportunities this fall to be reminded just how far off the ethical path republicans have strayed.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:22 am
Leroy, are you suggesting that the GreedOverPrinciples party will be exposed for what they are: hypocrites of the highest order?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:33 am
The Minnesota Democrat Party has openly announced that it is willing to offer promotions to members who endanger the lives of other drivers and commit crimes in the act of campaigning against other legislators.
To this day, I have not heard one prominent Democrat address the lawlessness of these three convicted criminals who hold positions of authority in their party.
Maybe, just maybe, when someone in the DFL has the guts to stand up against the party’s criminal triumverate and demand that they be stripped of leadership positions and removed from their respective caucuses, then the Minnesota Democrat Party will have a leg to stand on in criticizing the District 16 BPOU. Don’t hold your breath.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:35 am
Maybe Leroy is taking Tommy’s meds. Either way, the voices in their heads are winning.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:46 am
Flounder has once again forgotten about , Kennedy,Sharpton,Hillery,Frank, Dollar Bill Jefferson,Nagin etc.
The libtards are hardly known for booting the slime in their own party.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:48 am
[...] Brodkorb touches all the bases on this indictment of the Republican Party’s endorsement of Rep. Mark Olson for the Minnesota [...]
August 13th, 2008 at 9:56 am
It took 8 posts to get to the DFLers.
Its the relative moralism that the GOP is obsessed with. The whole “Yeah, but your side did…”. Its the win at any cost or, the one upsman on the the Democrats at any cost that fuels the party.
Mike’s blog has made denying and ignoring a bad action an option. Yet, I’ll give him props for writing this piece and did not take one shot at the Dems or try to blame us.
Tough act to pull off Mikey, you did it.
You probably should have closed the comment section off too.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:04 am
Also, the GOP Party runs on good white Christian family values and moralism. So, when a member faults away from that, then you damn right its an issue. Hypocrisy is ever present in politics but, still worth the finger pointing.
On the Democrats side we focus on helping the less fortunate and mandating opportunities. So when a rich Dem is found to be pretty cheap on the charitable contributions, or caught stealing from the poor, or displaying racist/bigot/discriminatory attitudes towards women, minorities and/or immigrants- then by all means are they fair game.
But, we don’t play a fair game, do we? We point at your hypocrites, you point at ours, w then fight over who’s less hypocritical.
Where has that gotten us?
(I’ll take a break, nd hope that Olson has at least gotten his sh*t together for the sake of his wife and any children. Tomorrow, I’ll be back kicking Chesnuts and other illogical republicans around.)
August 13th, 2008 at 10:36 am
[...] most prominent Republican blogger is questioning Mark Olson’s candidacy for the Minnesota Senate. Olson, currently a member of the Minnesota [...]
August 13th, 2008 at 10:38 am
Thanks for sharing your insights Drew.
I would greatly appreciate it if you could answer some questions for me since I was unable to attend the endorsing convention.
It is a shame that Senator Wergin was unable to address the convention. What was the rationale for that?
Other than Mark’s wife, who also nominated him before he gave his speech?
What was the final vote count and how many ballots did it take for Olson to get the 60% needed?
Why was Krueger unable to gain any footing or momentum during the convetion?
Thanks in advance for helping me answer these questions!
August 13th, 2008 at 10:41 am
I applaud Michael for his stance here. MDE, has a had a field day/week/month/year with the Democrats endorsing Angry Al Franken but usually “the silence is deafening” when it comes to misdeeds on the part of someone on your side. This is a commendable exception.
An accusation is not proof of guilt but this guy guy took the case to a full jury trial and was found guilty. I hope they get their relationship together but the prospective of this are not that good so he is a “ticking time bomb” for the republican party who endorsed him. It’s a free country, he has the right to run for office but not the right to an endorsement. If he beats his wife again (good probability)and there is police/legal action the democrats and their fawning mainstream media will make the most of the republican endorsement.
There are ways to redact the endorsement. The Republicans should use these.
I agree with Micheal with his brave post here.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:50 am
Drew is a thoughtful commentator on this site and others. Let me start with that.
The endorsement pledge is significant and important, no question about that.
This is an extreme and unique circumstance, and I hope Krueger runs with the full support of Senate Republicans and others.
Many of the comments on this site ring true with a theme we cannot turn a blind eye towards. The GOP has been the party of values (Foley was thrown out, Republicans have roundly criticized others who have abused power consistently).
We cannot back Olson in this race.
Many believe we’ve lost our brand on spending. We cannot lose our brand on values. Not when the left is giving us Jeremiah Wright and Al Franken.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:56 am
Drew, could you elaborate on the issue of the BPOU not allowing the outgoing Senator to speak?
I’ve heard rumblings about that around here, but nothing definitive.
If Olson supporters simply didn’t allow legitimate delegates to vote, that is very problematic (still not as problematic as the domestic assault).
August 13th, 2008 at 10:58 am
(Foley was thrown out,…”
Yeah, “right.”
Only - and ONLY - after what GOP Leadership knew for years, became public.
What you really mean, is:
“We tossed Foley out, after the cover-up blew apart.”
And, who was one of those that tossed Hastert under the bus, to save his own hypocritical GOP hide?
John Boehner. Your party replaced on cover-up artist, with another:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092901574.html
August 13th, 2008 at 11:08 am
Tommy, Democrats knew the same things about Foley for years. Why didn’t they say anything until the politically opportune time to do so?
“So when a rich Dem is found to be pretty cheap on the charitable contributions, or caught stealing from the poor, or displaying racist/bigot/discriminatory attitudes towards women, minorities and/or immigrants- then by all means are they fair game.”
What about when Democrats are convicted of drunk driving and campaign fraud? Apparently lesser crimes.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:10 am
So Flounder when is dollar bill going to get tossed , the samer time as Kennedy and Hillery?
August 13th, 2008 at 11:15 am
Loris - Why is this a difficult concept for you?
We can all agree that drunk driving is a serious offense as is stealing campaign materials of your political opponent. But beating on your wife is the issue here and this is one case where “I’m sorry” just doesn’t cut it.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:24 am
So just when does somebody who committed a crime, paid restitution (including jail time) after admitting mistakes, get the chance to resume their life? Is there anything called “redemption” any more?
I’m not defending what Olson did. However, I think after spending jail time, fines, getting banished from the House Republican Caucus and getting a tough challenger in his house seat, I think he’s paid the price for his mistake.
If you would spend time looking at his legislative record, you will find it is without blemish. He is as conservative as they get.
I’m actually happy that Mark Olson won the endorsement and will be even happier when he wins the election. It will just go to show that true leaders can rise above the personal challenges they face. I think he will make an excellent State Senator who has already paid the price of past sins.
Perhaps now is the time to forgive him and welcome him back to the fold - after all, his wife (who he was convicted of beating) already did. In fact, she is the one who encouraged him to run for the seat. Maybe it is time for us to put past grievances aside and move forward.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:25 am
I really didn’t think Rep. Olson was going to run for endorsement, as I assumed he would be at the Summer Olympics competing in the Bible Throw event.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:31 am
I think Skydancer has put the right facts into the situation regarding Olson. His supporters showed up to put forth what they they decided they wanted, now it is up to the voters to decide what they want.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:35 am
DJZ is a worthless troll:
“On the Democrats side we focus on helping the less fortunate and mandating opportunities.”
Democrats focus on stealing from one class of people in order to give it to their politically dependent “victim” classes. Nothing more.
“So when a rich Dem is found to be pretty cheap on the charitable contributions, or caught stealing from the poor, or displaying racist/bigot/discriminatory attitudes towards women, minorities and/or immigrants- then by all means are they fair game.”
Is there any other kind of Democrat than some sliver spoon rich jerk who are exceptionally cheap in charitable contributions, or who prominently display racist, bigoted attitudes? Seems you’ve aptly defined what it is to be a Democrat, DJZ.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:37 am
Senator Wergin was not seated as a delegate. It is my understanding that she was elected a delegate at her precinct caucus. And she has been seated as a delegate at all other conventions. I’ve never heard of a delegate showing up and not being seated. I do not know why she was not seated. Perhaps someone running the show will clarify that.
There was a motion to change the rules to preclude anyone not a delegate/alternate or resident of the district or candidate family member from delivering an endorsement speech. The gal that read the motion said they wanted to “prevent party elites and politicians from unduly influencing the outcome”. It was so cool to almost be banned from this convention as I am none of the above. Unfortunately the motion failed after Mark Swanson spoke up and straightened the joint out. Would have been an honor to be banned but it just wasn’t my day I guess.
The rationale behind barring Betsy Wergin’s family and friends from attending as guests so as to see/hear her farewell address is a mystery to me. They were turned away at the door. Every “VIP” in the room was allowed to speak except Betsy.
The first ballot took about 1/2 hour to count. The second ballot was counted within 10 minutes as we were up against a mandatory 9:30pm adjournment. In fact, there was a motion to adjourn before the vote tally was rushed to the podium. But the chair decided not to recognize the motion to adjourn even though he reiterated it over the sound system. And the vote totals weren’t close to the total from the first ballot. I guess there may have been folks who left. But it didn’t look like anyone left.
Rep. Tom Hackbarth nominated Mark Olson his friend and colleague of many years. It was seconded by another guy (bearded)I couldn’t hear at all. Heidi concluded the nomination speeches by exhorting everyone to vote for Mark because he is cute. It was really charming. It’s all on tape somewhere. There were 2-3 cameras rolling. Phil Krinkie was also on stage in support. You have to give Mark credit. He rallied his people and they showed up.
But the way they treated Betsy was awful.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:45 am
I agree, if the comments published here are as claimed (I wasn’t there so I’m only going by heresay on this blog), the way they treated Betsy was awful.
I had the great opportunity to help her get reelected to the Senate in 2006. She is a great person and hard worker, someone who should have had the respect of all present.
On the other hand, I’m happy that Olson got the endorsement.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Skydancer-
So I assume if you believe in redemption, you also believe Al Franken’s jokes and business issues are now also off limits, since the issues are in the past, and he has apologized?
August 13th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
If a person has a right to stand against someone’s endorsement for voting to override the Governor’s veto, don’t they have a right to oppose an endorsement for whatever reason they want?
SD16 chose Mark Olson without regard for his recent legal history. That was their choice.
Frankly, I’m surprised at the number of people calling for an outright mutiny over this issue. What’s the big difference between 20 or 21 republican senators? Is this really a hill to die on? As a micro-minority the senate republican ability to get anything done is largely contingent on the House’s ability to enforce the Governor’s veto.
As Wheelock Whitney said years ago “Victory Goes To Thise Who Show Up”
August 13th, 2008 at 12:31 pm
Excellent post Michael-
Drew- I was just about to say the same thing- The party belongs to those who show up.
If you don’t like your local leadership- it’s not all that difficult to organize and oust them. I’m curious- how much notice was provided to delegates regarding the endorsing convention?
I don’t know Allison- but she should definitely run.
Where is the shame Mr. Olson? Same question to all those who stood next to him to support him- where is your shame? Let me guess- he’s asked for God’s forgiveness so now everything is OK– whatever John Edwards.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
I think a conversation should be had about why the heck the Governor appointed Betsy Wergin to the PUC.(I truely don’t believe her brother knew nothing about it like she stated in the paper) She has no qualifications for the job, Senator Murphy’s LTE around the state shows that confirmation from the DFL may be difficult. Then what do we have - we lose a good senator for what?Everyone knows the problems in SD16 so know one should be surprised about the Olson endorsement. Chalk up another senate seat loss on the Governor’s cronyism.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Skydancer, its not about if his people support him. He seemed to be pretty popular. This issue is, has he gotten the help he’s needed to maintain his temper without lashing out. It wasn’t just him wife, which would label him a domestic abuser but his staff as well. He’s just an abuser and at only 5′9″ and 180lbs, he’s heading for a serious awakening when he pulls that on someone with a shorter fuse than his.
You seem right in line with the win at all cost and any Republican is better than any Democrat mindset. You are willing to look at wife-beaters, wife-cheaters, child molesters, racists, sexists, and xenophobes if they are Republicans. Not only that, but you’re willing to justify their misdeeds with the ever-so tired “Democrats…”
CheeseNuts,
Do you have any decency? No- of course not. You do know that this is a country of taxation. You want services, you pay taxes. So no one steals from anyone, unless you count 66% of American Corporations that pay 0 in taxes or 68% of Foreign Corporations that operate here that pay 0 in federal taxes. Naw, you’re OK with that. Its those damn poor Americans with help from the Democrats that’s stealing from us.
Girl, you are an idiot.
Republicans run on family values (while electing cheaters and abusers), Christian faith (while acting in the most unchristian ways), fiscal responsibility (while running up the biggest debt in history, and deficit known to man) and Americana (while showing great disdain toward fellow Americans).
So you and Drew can hold your heads up. Guys like you, have produced and presented guys Like Mark Olson to us, over and over again.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Leroy posted: Leroy Jenkins Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Skydancer-
So I assume if you believe in redemption, you also believe Al Franken’s jokes and business issues are now also off limits, since the issues are in the past, and he has apologized?
Skydancer responded:
August 13th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Dave Ziegler you disappoint in your nonsensical blather. Your words beget another new term in politics. Nincompoopism doesn’t suffice.
Welcome to “turdism”.
Thanks Dave!
August 13th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Leroy Jenkins Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Skydancer-
So I assume if you believe in redemption, you also believe Al Franken’s jokes and business issues are now also off limits, since the issues are in the past, and he has apologized?
Al Franken did not spend the night in jail or deal with the courts or get banished from his caucus. In essence, he never paid any restitution for his behavior. He’s paying it now as Michael keeps hitting him with his past indescretions. Al Franken is only now getting the bad press that Mark Olson got the day he was put in jail. It’s not the fact that Olson has apologized, it’s the fact that he’s been ostracized and paid a price larger than you’ve probably paid in your entire life for a misdeed that you’ve done. He’s paid a larger price than anything I’ve ever done. But we’re not elected officials, therefore perhaps his penalty needed to be larger. The fact is, I think it’s time to stop penalizing Olson after he’s already served his time. (AKA - You do the crime, you serve the time.) Al Franken hasn’t served any time but a little bit of public embarrassment for his deeds.
DJZ Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Skydancer, its not about if his people support him. He seemed to be pretty popular. This issue is, has he gotten the help he’s needed to maintain his temper without lashing out. It wasn’t just him wife, which would label him a domestic abuser but his staff as well. He’s just an abuser and at only 5′9″ and 180lbs, he’s heading for a serious awakening when he pulls that on someone with a shorter fuse than his.
You seem right in line with the win at all cost and any Republican is better than any Democrat mindset. You are willing to look at wife-beaters, wife-cheaters, child molesters, racists, sexists, and xenophobes if they are Republicans. Not only that, but you’re willing to justify their misdeeds with the ever-so tired “Democrats…”
Name me one Democrat who has actually had to pay a price for their deeds. Even Jim Metzen, who did serve a few hours in jail, got by with a $300 fine and all is forgiven. The DFL never punished Metzen, Mondale or Rukavina - never pulled leadership posts away from them, denied them endorsements or kicked them out of the caucus. Perhaps if the DFL would have given them harsher penalties I could agree with Michael. I think we’ve already put Olson in his place and it’s time to quit penalizing him after he’s already paid the price.
If Olson hasn’t gotten his temper under control and pulls that with someone who has a shorter wick than he does, then I guess we’ll deal with it when the time comes.
August 13th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
Kudos, Mike.
It’s sad to have to use this blog’s estimable credibility and authority to shame a local unit of our own party, but it is certianly a worthwile use.
I don’t know what is wrong with the people in SD16, but as far as I can tell from their actions, they are no better than the morons in the 5th CD.
And for all of you drooling, scumbag Democrat piles that ooze in here: Take a lesson.
August 13th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
“We can all agree that drunk driving is a serious offense as is stealing campaign materials of your political opponent.”
Apparently we cannot all agree on those things, because NONE OF THEM HAVE EVER FACED EVEN THE SLIGHTEST REPERCUSSIONS FROM MINNESOTA DEMOCRATS.
August 13th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Say, Ziegler?
I hear there is a three car pileup on 394….sprained ankles, contusions, punitive damages….run, boy, run!
August 13th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
“Skydancer” said: “Is there anything called “redemption” any more?”
Sure there is.
I’d buy a cheeseburger and fries from Olson without a second thought. If he needs a recommendation for McDonalds he can call me anytime.
August 13th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Loris — if you beat your wife, you shouldn’t be in public office. Period.
As far as forgiveness, redemption, etc — that is between him and God and his loved ones. I wish him the best.
But in the political realm, being a wife-beater is unforgivable. Everyone draws the line where they want. As far as I’m concerned, wife-beaters should not be running for public office.
You can do whatever else you want — work at McDonalds, sell Amway, whatever — don’t be asking for my vote.
August 13th, 2008 at 2:09 pm
Considering both Republican Rep candidates in SD42 are female (Shari May and Jenifer Loon), I can see how you would believe that wife-beaters should not be running for public office. How about husband beaters?
August 13th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
Say, skydancer?
You have certianly earned your psuedonym by showing everyone that you have nothing but clear-blue-skys between your ears.
Saaay, are you really Porn-O-Rama Franken or one of his shoe-shine boys?
August 13th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Considering you just insulted me Swiftee, I guess my point must be hitting home with you pretty hard.
No, I’m not a Porn-O-Bama Franken or one of his boys. Sorry to disappoint.
August 13th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Good work Michael. Word is that a group of Republican legislators will be holding a press conference to announce they will endorse the Democrat candidate if Olson wins the primary.
August 13th, 2008 at 3:01 pm
So, to be clear. Beat your wife. Redemption is a possibility, and re-election with the party’s blessing is nearly assured.
Tell a dirty joke. Redemption is between you and your maker, and you have no right to seek higher office.
Is it any wonder why America doesn’t really know what republicans stand for anymore?
August 13th, 2008 at 3:07 pm
Leroy:
You’re missing the point. Some of us believe that after you pay the penalties for your misdeeds, then you have the right to redemption, including the right to seek (and have granted) the endorsement for public office.
Others don’t see it that way and believe that redemption is between you and your maker with no right to seek higher office.
It has nothing to do with Franken and his telling of dirty jokes.
I think there are some in the party who believe that if you do something wrong, you should be ostracized and expelled period, largely because the Dems don’t punish their people at all for wrongdoing.
My opinion, if you haven’t gathered it by now, is that kind of thinking is as extremist in one direction as the DFL lack of punishment is in the other. The only reason I’m defending Olson in this one is because he’s served out his sentence.
We don’t need to be as extreme on punishment as the DFL is on permissiveness. If someone served their sentence, that should be the end of it and we can move on with that person in the party, full blessings and all. (That’s why we have endorsement contests - whether we like the results or not)
August 13th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
Airhead, your appearance here in defense of the indefensable insults us all.
If you are not Franken, and don’t work for Franken, you should apply right away…he needs guys like you.
And take that scumbag Olson with you on your way over there.
August 13th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
Republicans are against wife beaters like Mark Olson. That is why Republicans across the state will work to defeat him in the Sept. primary.
August 13th, 2008 at 3:15 pm
Swiftee:
As far as I’m concerned, Olson needs all the friends he can get. Heck, I might even contribute to his campaign if you guys keep going on like this…. no, I’m cutting the check as soon as I get home from work. Furthermore, I’m going to help him doorknock his district just because people like you have hardened your hearts so much that you can’t see the good in people. I say give the guy a second chance. I don’t live in his district but I’ll make the trip up to Princeton or Mille Lacs to help him out. I wasn’t planning on it until now, but you’ve convinced me. Thanks.
August 13th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
“You do know that this is a country of taxation. You want services, you pay taxes.”
I have no problem paying taxes for services. I have every problem with the 40 percent of individuals who pay no taxes and who consume more than their share of services. And I have a major fucking problem with the 30 percent who pay no taxes, but who get tax refunds.
There’s no service being provided in that equation. Just theft.
“So no one steals from anyone, unless you count 66% of American Corporations that pay 0 in taxes or 68% of Foreign Corporations that operate here that pay 0 in federal taxes.”
No corporation anywhere pays any taxes on anything. Taxes are paid by the consumer in the form of higher prices. Even the Star and Sickle understands that.
“Its those damn poor Americans with help from the Democrats that’s stealing from us.”
Democrats don’t help anyone. They turn them into political dependents. Nothing more.
August 13th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Olson will lose. Either in a primary or in the general election. If the state party spends 1 dollar saving his ass it would be used against our party for years to come.
August 13th, 2008 at 4:47 pm
A source told me that Olson won quite convincingly at the endorsing convention (something like 97-40 on the second ballot). It perplexes me how he can get trounced when he ran for the endorsement of his old seat and then turn around a couple of months later and decisively beat Krueger (hand selected by Senator Wergin)for the Senate District Endorsement.
Not only did Olson convince 97 people to vote for him, he also has the backing of a few Minnesota House Reps (at least Hackbarth and Drazkowski).
So Swiftee, are all these people scumbags as well?
-Sidepoint- although I agree with Swiftee and Chestnut on an overwhelming amount of issues, I think they would be much better served if they did not use gutter language and call people disgusting names.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:18 pm
So Chestnut, you really believe that corporations don’t pay taxes and the 33% that do, shouldn’t have to?
Enough said. You are upset with individuals who get food, healthcare and shelter from the government (its actually about 12% of welfare recipients that are not in the workforce withing six years- not 40%.) and could care less about the companies that profit off of the American worker and consumer yet, find a way to give nothing back?
I’ll let your philosophy stand.
Hey Switcher, who said I’m an attorney? Who said I was that kind of an attorney? Is it hard to believe that a Democrat can make money off of corporate mergers, or regulatory consulting for major manufactures, or the kind that put scumbags who beat their wives in jail, Mr Electrician?
August 13th, 2008 at 5:20 pm
I don’t know if they’re scumbags or not, I.R.
I have not read anything about their behaviors other than that they are supporting a scumbag for elected office.
At this point, until I get more information, I guess I’d have to go with “morons”.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
Oh, Drazkowski supports the wife-beating Olson. Now there’s an endorsement with credibility on the issue.
You make this too easy. Olson will drag at least one more seat down with his. It won’t matter in the Senate but, in the House, that’s one of five to the super majority needed to really put things back in order.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
DJZ:
I think you’re being a little overconfident. A lot can happen between now and election day.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:34 pm
Isn’t it up to the people in SD16 to decide who is to repesent them? Isn’t that what grassroot representation is all about?What is the state party and a group of republican legislators getting involved for? It is not really any of their business. I think SD 16 has spoken, and whether you like it or not it is their decision not anyone elses.
August 13th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Michael,
Does this mean you acknowledge that our party’s endorsement process is broken?