“Sure, it means stupid. Unimportant. Frivolous. Without consequence. Infinitesimally small.”

What does that description have to do with “gay”? Are you aware of the crushing damage you do when you call things “gay”?

Dead Serious, please explain you dikk.

“I think they were banned because they are obviously biased.”

“They let Brodkorb in, and he’s obviously biased.”

“Brodkorb never lied about his bias.”

This implies an opinion that the UpTake was denied access because they’re not forthcoming about their bias.

Also, they would be happy to film the other side of that story if they weren’t banned from doing so.

And they are telling the truth when they say they put up raw footage. The bias comes mostly from the footage they decide to shoot.

It’s just like the newspapers deciding to cover one side of a story to make the opposing viewpoint dissapear. Doesn’t mean what they cover isn’t factual, just not complete.

Like I said, the only real objection I have to Chuck & Co. is the cosy relationship they maintain with the sock puppets over at MiniSoros Dependent.

“10:12 Mike McIntee: Chuck Olsen will be covering the presser at 11:30am today. The reason given for not live streaming is they believe the Coleman campaign watches it and then tailors it’s news conference to respond to what the Franken campaign says. I think it’s a silly restriction, but since it is being applied to all media, we’re abiding.”

You’re whacking something, that much is true.

It’s turned into lefty asswipe wack-a-mole in here.

No….think about it.

Sure, it means stupid. Unimportant. Frivolous. Without consequence. Infinitesimally small.

I don’t know anybody who eats sand. Do you?

The day after the USDA adds sand as a food group and publishes a minimum recommended daily allowance, I’ll publish a big apology for ever considering you a moron.

Until then, just take my word for it.

Deal?

I’m not sure what insulting me has to do with this discussion.

I don’t have any problem with lefty pap mongers per se, I object to lefty pap spreaders that lie about it outright.

I also don’t have any problem with them limiting their contributors to liberals as long as they are funding themselves. It’s their equipment, it’s their website.

I just don’t want to hear that they are receiving any government grants, or I’ll be down there demanding equal time….Hee hee…Chuck would go ballistic!

Free the UpTake! (as soon as they disassociate themselves from MiniSoros)

Why are you wasting your mad assnozzle skillz at MnPubic for free when you could be getting paid at MiniSoros Dependent?

Since they got rid of Feckless Jeff and Andy Birkey, they are real short on complete, utter morons….you should interview. No, really.

a: is fine; b: is also fine, as long as other people get to call them on it.

Chuck and I have had our disagreements, and it’s obvious to anyone that the Uptake is a left wing production, but it’s just as obvious that the lefty product they do produce is pretty high quality.

And while the blanket claim to be “citizen journalists” can be used to cover a bias, to my knowledge I don’t think the UpTake has ever denied it’s liberal bias.

I also have not heard that they are being covertly funded by a certifiable socialist kook with deep pockets.

The same cannot be said about Robin Marty’s nest of Soros minions who, by their initial mendacity, have forever forfeited their chance at being considered anything other than the astro-turf sock puppet theater they are today.

Sounds like he’s advocating for your inclusion.

BTW, I have always believed that Chuck is a stand-up guy.

Best laugh I’ve had all day.

http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=Jason+deRusha

Everyone has an axe to grind. The fun is in learning what they are and exploiting them. I imagine that is why Steve is so interested in where people eat. He gets a halfie seeing a television reporter at a drive thru, and now he gets a chance to brag about it. Maybe someone will want HIS autograph because of it. Then he would be famous, and all the richness that the republican way of life was supposed to provide would finally come his way.

Kyle.. can you please explain the meaning of this? Seriously.

Anyway, I don’t have a problem with MDE bringing this up. I’d have serious questions as to why the Franken campaign is against live streaming their news conference. What’s the harm?

But to slam The UpTake for complying with that request, without noting that they’ve attempted to do the same live streaming at Coleman news conferences, seems a little disingenuous to me.

Also, do you have a link to anything indicating it went down like this? Seems like something that’s a bit mischaracterized.