Comments on: COLEMAN RECOUNT UPDATE

By: BC

BC — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:31:03 +0000

Swiftee, thanks for letting us in on the real purpose of this web site! It is good to know that you right wingers could not be as stupid as the arguments that you put forward.

By: swiftee

swiftee — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:10:53 +0000

Say, Ryan?

Can they do any tricks? Jerk the string a bit and let’s see what they do.

By: swiftee

swiftee — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:08:56 +0000

Just look at ‘em dance! HAHAHA!!!

Dance buttboys…dance!!

By: danbrome

danbrome — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:52:46 +0000

Hey Swiftee, do you think Senator Coleman will try to win his seat back in 2020?

By: St. Paul Dem

St. Paul Dem — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:05:54 +0000

Yeah Ryan! Way to post a verbatim talking point! You’re such a good reporter! Just like Mike!

By: Drew

Drew — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:59:42 +0000

Swiftee:

Are you kidding me, we love this site. Comedy Gold!

By: swiftee

swiftee — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:28:51 +0000

Post up: 10:31

PlyDim response: 10:32

You’ve slid right into the driver’s seat, Ryan….you’ve got the Democrat buttboy brigade dancing on a string already!

By: pops

pops — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:17:35 +0000

Plymouth Dem seems to forget that the Franken campaign was the one who demanded that “incorrectly rejected” absentee ballots be counted and the ACORN endorsed Secretary of State who demanded counties put those ballots in a special pile!

By: hiram

hiram — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:58:13 +0000

I think it is totally improper for either the Franken or Coleman campaign to negotiate over votes. Those votes belong to the voters, not the campaigns, and neither campaign has the right to negotiate that which does not belong to them.

By: PlymouthDem

PlymouthDem — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:32:42 +0000

So, basically, the Coleman campaign’s position is because it can’t get it’s additional ballots counted, ballots independent election officials determined were not improperly rejected, Coleman will stonewall and ensure that NONE of the ballots are counted?

Notably, the Coleman campaign agreed that ballots should be added to the list generated by the election officials IF BOTH CAMPAIGNS AGREED TO THEM BEING ADDED. God forbid Coleman be subject to the rule it came up with.

Despite the fact that it’s clear that Coleman is willing to disenfranchise some 1400 voters to get his way, how does this make sense in light of the fact COLEMAN IS BEHIND?