I hope Norman is asking his PR/Lawyer team to explain the media coverage in the morning. Note to the former senator: you will be laughed at even further if you keep this up. Minnesotans want a senator seated. As painful as that may be to you, you should concede after the ballots are opened April 7.

Wall St. Journal:
Ballot Ruling Favors Franken in Senate Battle
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123854611413476215.html

Associated Press — international/national/state wire story:
Court cripples Coleman’s comeback chances in U.S. Senate race
http://www.postbulletin.com/newsmanager/templates/localnews_story.asp?z=2&a=392265

Star Tribune:
Coleman all but concedes, but will appeal court ruling
http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/42221767.html?elr=KArks7PYDiaK7DUdcOy_nc:DKUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU

Twin Cities Planet:
Ruling further diminishes Coleman’s election contest prospects
http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/article/2009/03/31/ruling-further-diminishes-coleman%E2%80%99s-election-contest-prospects.html

Reuters newswire (International/national), including Washinton Post:
Ruling on uncounted Senate votes favors Franken
http://www.reuters.com/article/peopleNews/idUSTRE52U8M720090331

NY Times:
Minnesota Court Ruling a Setback for Coleman
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/minnesota-court-ruling-a-setback-for-coleman/

The Hill:
Court hands Coleman defeat in key decision
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/court-hands-coleman-defeat-in-key-decision-2009-03-31.html

And surprise, here’s the Fox News headline (can you say down-low play?:
Panel Allows Review Of 400 Ballots In Minnesota Election
http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/panel-allows-review–ballots-minnesota-election/

danbrome, still hiding behind the “moderate” label? Talk about lonely, a guy who is so ashamed of his political views must get pretty lonely sitting there at night with the lights off wishing he were man enough to speak the truth.

In post 19 I explained why I was posting off-topic and tried to get back on-topic. But apparently you were not interested in that.

I explain it further in posts 21 and 24 and even used the phrase “it was my fault.” But again, I guess that is not clear enough for you.

Everyone else has figured this out, but I will spell it out again for Pete. I responded to a post by KIS, who had posted in error on this thread. Therefore my response was also off-topic. My bad. No big deal. I also apologize for Pete who has forced all of you to sit through this. He means well.

You are commenting on somebody else’s ego?

PPPLLLLEEEAAASSSEEE!!!!!!!

Babbling? I hardly think one sentence is considered babbling AC. I have noticed however that whenever you are pushed into a corner you respond with a “babbling” comment. You are so transparent.

Did you read the post KIS did correcting his error? It sounds pretty stupid of you to make the same mistake after he clearly said it was the wrong topic. Just how dumb are you AC?

Well, let’s see, I’m not a lawyer, but when you file a lawsuit, you had better have PROOF to back up your claims. Otherwise, those would be called theories, opinions, ideas, etc. Without proof, you have a very weak legal argument.

Isn’t it up to the judges to decide what the Coleman team should have to do? Are you somehow connected to the panel of judges deciding this case? What type of proof would there be of something that did not happen? Do you smoke dope all day or do you switch to something stronger in the evenings?

But back to that train.

I love how in today’s Pioneer Press, Ginsberg said that their lack of proof shouldn’t matter. Yeah, that should help steam your freight train. What a boob.

From the Pioneer Press:

The spreadsheet Coleman submitted indicated he has not put into the record proof that 649 of the voters whose ballots he’d like counted did not vote in any other way.

Attorney Ben Ginsberg, Coleman’s chief trial spokesman, said the lack of proof shouldn’t matter.

WTF? You filed this challenge. The burden of proof is on you!

Take a look at the top of this web site. See the MDE banner? Suppose somebody in charge of this web site accidentally replaced that graphic with a list of Michael Brodkorb’s social security number, credit card number, security code, etc. And you come to this web site and see that information. Who’s fault is that? Your fault or the person on the web team who published that info?

Are you a criminal for accessing that info when it was published for the world to see?

If I put on old refrigerator on the curb in front of my house with a “free” sign on it, I can not turn around and claim that it was stolen by somebody. That is exactly what happened here. Coleman’s staff published an unencrypted database on the internet for anyone to see. Easy as downloading a JPEG or a video. Nothing illegal about downloading it.

I posted the last post on the wrong thread …. one of the few threads that it is not relevant to..

…… no wonder terrorist Kathleen Soliah wants to be back with her supportive community.

How again does Norm posess any momentum other than a growing stench of failure?

It is obvious to me that he was agreeing with this post which clearly was saying that Al Franken is in denial about his pending loss.

Leroy is a jackass lobbyist.

Al Franken is just such a pig.

Senator-Elect Al Franken

danbrome is gay.

Desperate denial.