It sure is fun kids.

I never called Corzine a multi-decade incumbent, you moron. I called Chris Dodd a multi-decade incumbent and said that Corzine was a long-serving politician, which he is. After serving in various high offices for ten years.

As for Hannity, unless you can prove that he is paid to present talking points, I’d be careful. You claim him to be dishonest (along with the Wall Street Journal and the Weekly Standard) but what you said was dishonest is a provable fact.

danbrome, you’re the one who posts inane talking points. You never back up anything you say. Not once, never, ever. Considering how uninformed you are, perhaps you should watch for the policy notes. Perhaps you’d learn something.

Rush Limbaugh is the king of conservative talk radio. He’s one of the most articulate and hilarious voices in politics. And he’s also a very, very nice man. He’s given away everything from automobiles to Select Comfort beds to Super Bowl tickets to members of his audience whom he treats as family.

The sad thing about people like you is how you demonize people you disagree with. Just like how Two Putz Tommy attacked Norm Coleman’s war hero dad. Just like James Carville and Paul Begala push poll you into doing on behalf of President Obama. I thought Obama was going to change politics. The only thing that’s happened is that politics have gotten worse.

Calling Sean Hannity “nice” ignores the fact that he has no honor. His dishonest presentation of the talking points he is so well paid to present are legendary on cable television.

He has every right to be a partisan, but NO RIGHT to be dishonest with the viewers. I would seriously be shocked if Sean Hannity truly believes the scripts he is given to espouse.

I watch for the laughs, not the policy notes.

I suppose you think RL is a nice man too, eh?

Correction, Jon Corzine served in the U.S. Senate for six years before being elected Governor of New Jersey. He is one of the most prominent elected officials in New Jersey — hardly a newbie to the scene.

I’m glad you watch Sean Hannity and can recall the exact order he mentions things on the show. That means that there’s still hope for you. I’ve met Hannity on a few occasions and don’t know of a nicer person on the national stage. But, as I said, I didn’t watch him last week and don’t usually get the chance to watch.

Just ignore the idiot. He is clearly a legend in his own mind.

Please listen carefully.

I never accused you of repeating false talking points about the vulnerabilty of some very prominent Democrats. What was interesting to me was the exact words that you and Sean Hannity shared. The races were even mentioned in the exact same order!

The Democrats in the talking points are vulnerable. However, one small correction.. Senator Corzine is in his first term, so has not been around long, hardly a “multi-decade incumbent” as you suggested.

I like you Chris, because you are reasoned and you will listen. A far cry from our convervative friend who suffers from tunnel vision and ignorance.

“I am right, you are wrong. Deal with it.”

This statement by you proves once and for all that you have the biggest head in the room and is a perfect illustration of your immaturity.

I’m sure your next response will include you typical grade-school name calling.

You might not have said that every Democrat is safe, but you certainly accused me of repeating false talking points about the vulnerabilty of some very prominent Democrats, which I certainly did not do.

It’s shocking that at this stage of the game multi-decade incumbents like Chris Dodd and long-serving politicians like Jon Corzine are in such trouble in the polls.

You know, it seems the only one spreading talking points around here, danbrome, is you.

I am right, you are wrong. Deal with it.

AC, do you really think anyone besides your socialist buddies give a damn what you think? You are such a fool.

I am definitely not fat (6’1″ 175), dumb (college GPA 3.45), or blind (I loved watching Obama sworn in). So I would appreciate if you could stop making your broad brush trash talk here.

I do not hold the position that every Democrat is safe, or that every Democrat is ahead in the polls.

“Many who voted for him are now having buyers remorse.”

Either you think I’m a fool or you are a big fool.

Where did you get this bit of information. Many Democrats are even more impressed with our President now than the day they rushed to the polls to elect him. This is gonna be fun.

If making up statistics about what Democrats are think makes it possible for you to get by, then be my guest. However, you are incredibly misinformed, or you simply spend too much time watching Hannity’s America.

And in response to post 139, face it. You got called out. You are a hypocritical liar and you got caught. You can’t even remember what you accuse people of from from week to week on here. That’s because you lie. If you tell the truth, that wouldn’t be a problem.

And the level of hate and rage in your posts is going up. I can’t imagine how frustrating this must be for you now that the economy is starting to settle down a bit and all the failure you’ve been hoping for looks like it might just not happen.

Thank God they are all fat, dumb, and blind. It makes the coming change just that much easier to pull off.

You can see the polls here:

Chris Dodd/Quinnipiac Poll (trails Rob Simmons by 1)

http://www.courant.com/news/local/statewire/hc-ap-ct-connecticutsenatemar10,0,2659885.story

Beau Biden/Public Policy Poll (Democratic polling firm) – (Trails Mike Castle by

http://www.rollcall.com/news/33014-1.html?CMP=OTC-RSS

http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20090311/NEWS02/903110343&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL

Jon Corzine/Quinnipiac poll (Trails Chris Christie by 9)

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/new_jersey_gov_jon_corzine.html

That’s funny because I didn’t watch Hannity this week to hear the “talking points.” Although if you want to know about talking points, maybe you should ask George Stephanopolous who has daily conference calls with Rahm Emanuel, James Carville and Paul Begala.

AC,

You’re right that if it weren’t for Fox, Hannity wouldn’t be on television. That’s because the rest of the cable networks only cater to liberal Democrats. Speaking of those cable networks, you ever check out their ratings? Thursday night’s prime time ratings for Fox were 2.64 million viewers, CNN had 1.21 million viewers and MSNBC had 1 million viewers. These numbers are consistent week after week. You can check them out here:

http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/ratings/top-news/cable-news

LOL!!!

With that statement, all here can be certain beyond the shadow of a doubt, that you are crazy.

Hannity is a walking talking hatchet man, with no connection to reality. He has every right to be a partisan, but his clueless rhetoric is nauseating. His nightly “panel” discussions are hilarious.

Sean Hannity speaks more truth in one show than you have in your entire life danny boy.

danbrome = a coward and a liar. He does his party proud!

“polls are showing Chris Dodd is in trouble in the blue state of Connecticut. I also know polls show that Beau Biden is behind in the blue state of Delaware. And John Corzine is severely behind in the polls in New Jersey, another blue state.”

FYI – This is taken word for word from Sean Hannity’s show on Thursday night.

Another solid performance by Chris when repeating Republican talking points.

Sad, sad, sad.

You may be right. Which is why unknown shadow organizations like Wikileaks are insiduous. It may take individuals (or a class of individuals) suing Wikileaks for posting their personal and credit card information to get to the bottom of what happened.

Have you spent your welfare check already? You are spending so much time researching worthless information you must have run out Boones Farm already. Too bad March is such a long month.

If I recall correctly, back in January, when that database was available, the log files were not on the computer. So when the Secret Service says they could not find any evidence, well probably not if the log file was not there at the same time! Any traffic to the site (and how many people viewed/downloaded that database) during that window of time was probably not logged.

Chris,

WikiLeaks says this: “Our servers are distributed over multiple international jurisdictions and do not keep logs. Hence these logs cannot be seized.”

If this is indeed true, then I think the FBI and the Coleman team – or anyone – is going to have a hard time tracking this down. And compared to some of the other items on WikiLeaks, this is small potatoes.

“all you libtards have is speculation and accustations with nothing to back it up. But that is all you folks usually have. Keep trying…”
http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/01/28/thousands-of-hits-crash-coleman-website/

Post #23 asks for your proof and you respond with “believe what you want” and don’t provide any proof.

“Facts please, not fantasy.”
http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/02/11/breaking-from-politico-reid-says-he-wont-seat-franken-prematurely/

In http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/02/07/wccoesmes-blog-desperately-seeking-al/ I asked for proof from someone else, and you made fun of me for asking. Then you state “youu never provide any links to support anything you said.” to someone else in that same thread.

“What proof do you have…”
“You want proof, find it. You seem to have a lot of free time on your freeloading hands.”
http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2008/12/14/walz-decides-against-running-for-governor-in-2010/

“danbrome, why can’t you post just ONE link that proves what you are saying? ”
and
“danbrome is incapable of even posting one piece of actual factual proof for the great majority of his insane rants here. That is why he responds that there are thousands and just to many to post. If there were truely thousands you would think he would post just one.”
http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/01/12/coleman-recount-update-a-statement-from-cullen-sheehan/

“How come you haven’t posted a link to proof…”
http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2008/12/29/double-counting-of-ballots-disenfranchises-millions-of-minnesotans/

“What proof do you have?”
http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2008/12/18/must-read-from-mpr-lets-play-senate-style-3-card-monte/

Pete, is this enough proof for you? I can provide more. All of these examples came from the first two of six pages of search results of pages that include you discussing “proof” in some way. Took me about five minutes to find this much.

I here Heinz makes a big bottle of ketchup that will make you foot taste better if you are interested.

danbrome is a coward because he will not admit what he is. He knows that being a liberal is a bad thing so proclaims himself to be a moderate to hide his shame.

You boys can call me what you want because I know what I am. You do so enjoy labeling people don’t you? So stop bitching about people calling you liberals/socialist. At least we are being truthfull.

I love hearing liberals tell the rest of us about our party and our movement. It’s really hilarious.

As for Rush wanting Obama to fail, how is that any different than James Carville, who on the morning of 9/11 said to a bunch of Washington reportars, “I certainly don’t want him (Bush) to succeed.”?

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2009/03/11/carville-wanted-bush-to-fail/

As for my party having a drugged out whacko, how is Rush any different than “I did a lot of blow but never tried any smack” Obama? Well, I’ll tell you how he’s different: Rush becaome addicted to prescription drugs that were legally prescribed to him by his doctors. Obama did illegal hard drugs.

You know for preaching about how wonderful progressives are and how compassionate they are, etc., you surely show just how mean spirited and hateful your side really is. Thanks for exposing yourself to not be a reasonable and moderate person.

What am I ill-informed on? What you really mean to say is that I don’t agree with you so I am a “lying, liberal bastard” who doesn’t know what they are talking about. You are just like Pete, Chris, MBB, Ryan, and all the rest. If somebody doesn’t agree, cast doubt on their level of knowledge and defeat their character with school boy insults. You guys are at the pinnacle of the ReBublican party. With a leader like Boss Limbaugh, how could you guys go wrong? You want to talk about a drugged out wacko, take a look at the head of your party…

The people you mentioned are not moderate in the sense that you mean. For you a moderate would be any “regular” ReBublican and a conservative would be somebody like Strom Thurmond, or Ann Coulter. In times like these, a moderate action won’t do. We need progressive policy to get us out of the economic crisis.

Also, let’s wait to talk about what the polls say until we actually know who the challengers are, and for that matter, if the current members will even seek re-election. The Democrats are doing fine, the sun is still coming up every day, and we haven’t been instantly attacked by the terrorists now that the cowboy isn’t in the White House. You would just assume give the Democrats no chance to succeed, and label them cheats and liars right from day one. You’re learning well from Boss Limbaugh. We all know that Rush is the moderate head of the RNC. He is surely a moderate, just like Chris, Pete, and so on…

I’m a conservative. Unlike danbrome who’s ashamed of being a liberal-socialist, I don’t feel the need to use a silly adjective to hide my true beliefs.

danbrome: LYING LIBERAL BASTARD

Integrity: ILL-INFORMED

First, neo-conservatives are not movement conservatives. It’s a term used to usually refer to Jews who are foreign policy hawks on issues relating to the Middle East in general and, specifically, Israel.

Second, while Bush cut taxes (and we saw not only economic growth but also increased government revenue), Republicans also spent money like Democrats and added new entitlements like Medicare Part D.

And last, just how is danbrome or you, for that matter, a moderate? Or President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi? Is it moderate to add $3.2 trillion to the national debt in the first 20 months of President Obama’s administration? (For your information, $2.9 trillion was added to the national debt during 8 years of the Bush administration.) Is it moderate to raise income and capital gains taxes? Even Bill Clinton cut capital gains taxes. Is it moderate to eliminate mortgage and charitable deductions for people who make over $200,000 a year?

I don’t know whether Democrats will be run out of town in 2010. But I do know that already polls are showing Chris Dodd is in trouble in the blue state of Connecticut. I also know polls show that Beau Biden is behind in the blue state of Delaware. And John Corzine is severely behind in the polls in New Jersey, another blue state. I don’t think I’d be bragging about how great the Democrats are under the circumstances.

The problem for you guys is that you see everything as black and white. For example, on fiscal policy this is your take:

Raising taxes = LIBERAL (SOCIALIST)

Cutting taxes = CONSERVATIVE (AMERICAN HERO)

Unfortunately for people of your “ilk” this isn’t how the real world works. The movement conservatives (neo-cons) have had their shot. They made one hell of a run, and were able to use their influence and power to secure the White House for 8 years. Unfortunately their ultra conservative plans that looked so great to them and their followers on paper haven’t worked the way they planned. The consequences of their actions are being brought to bear. You guys have a long way to go if you think that you will run the Democrats out of town in 2010. It took the movement conservatives over 50 years to build up this movement, but their support has crumbled as a consequence of their actions, and the voters won’t have it anymore.

Instead of harassing danbrome and others about posting a position that they are a moderate on, why don’t you guys tell us what you are moderates on, unless you want to label yourselves as movement conservatives as I have…good luck.

Re-read post #90. Better yet, print it out and read it before you go to bed each night.

danbrome keeps trying to pass himself off as a “moderate democrat.” Those who see danbrome as a commie-socialit bastard have asked him to provide examples of issues where he has a “moderate” stance. True to his lefty leanings, he always cuts-and-runs. He is a coward.

Last fall, danbrome was posting anywhere he could, to lie and say that Asslick Madia was a “Social Moderate” and a “Fiscal Conservative”. When challenged to provide proof, he ran like a scared little girl everytime!

danbrome: LYING COWARD

Now THAT’S funny… Your contention that you know what an established fact is.

Your “established facts” are pure fiction 99% of the time.

LOL!!!

With all due respect, who is going to run the Democrats out of town in 2 years? The conservative Republicans?

LOL!!!!

But since you “are never wrong” I doubt it. You will ignore established facts just to avoid admitting that you are wrong. Typical liberal.

Thank God the current goverment is a short term problem that will be run out of town in 2 years.

Why is it liberals always have to lie and cheat? Is it a mental illness? Can it be treated? Or is it just frequent and heavy drug usage that destroys the brain cells that are used to determine right and wrong?

I believe that last one is the correct answer.

I pity people of your ilk danbrome. How can you live with no standards?

It doesn’t matter whether the website was hacked or not. The fact is that whomever downloaded and re-published the information was not entitled to do so under the law. I can’t wait to see what happens when the FBI and Secret Service get done with investigating this.

Your “experts” quoted at mindy ignored one thing: A hacker would not need to “download” the information. The database could have been stolen using a simple copy-past quality. There is no way for the host website to detect this.

Talk about “threats to post that information online” is absurd – the information was ALREADY available to anyone with a web browser!

No firewalls were breached – there were no firewalls in place protecting the data. All one needed to find the data was the IP address of Coleman’s website – information that is commonly used by people browsing the web.

Defending Coleman on this is laughable. Accusing the Democrats of some conspiracy is nutball territory.

http://minnesotaindependent.com/28748/colemans-site-wasnt-hacked-says-it-pro-who-discovered-donor-breach

Everybody here remembers your rants when you have been asked to provide proof of your allegations.

Eye witnesses are hard to rebut.

You are completely dishonest when you bob and weave through your prior statements, and you know it.

“When did I ever say that Democrats were having buyers remorse?”

I refer you to post #97 by Pete F. (YOU).

“Many who voted for him are now having buyers remorse.”

Pete, do you stand corrected?

Usually when you find that you are always right and everyone else is always wrong, you are the fool in the equation, not everyone else…

When did I ever say that Democrats were having buyers remorse? Most of them have been drinking the Flavor-Aid for to many years to have any thoughts at all.

What I said was many people who voted for him are having buyers remorse. That would be the independents who fell for his lies about change. That would be some Republicans who fell for his lies about change.

I would ask if you guys are really that stupid but I already know the answer.

As far as the MSM they are to lazy to do any research. Even an idiot like AC can read the statute he quoted and see that it only applies to transactions where the credit card is actually scanned.

How you store the data is at issue, not the storing of the data in this case. I guess that isn’t good enough for these guys so they have to sprinkle some of their fairy dust and try to make things appear that aren’t there.

Final note: I think AC loves Andrew.

Since Norm Coleman is not in the business of processing credit cards, he likely uses the services of companies in that business. Since Norm Coleman does not have supporters typically walk in the door with card to run through machines, I’d bet his campaign uses a web based service, like Cardservice International, and that his campaign staff types in the credit card numbers online through a secure server (just as donors would do the same if they went to his website). In fact, Coleman’s website states that only web contributions were released.

Put up or shut up.

That being said, hopefully someone (maybe me this weekend) can research MN and federal laws and statutes to see which ones apply. Pete says the ones I mentioned above (same as been mentioned in the MSM) are obsolete and/or irrelevant.

You assume one thing: that the Coleman campaign uses credit card machines and not a web-based service (such as Cardservice International) to run credit card numbers.

Keep ‘em coming and welcome to the conversation.

At the U a few years back, the entire campus had to go through this process. All of these “credit card machines” couldn’t even be in the same room as the rest of the machines. They had to be secured in a locked room and no internet browsing software could be installed on those machines. So basically we had all our file servers and web servers in one room, then in a small locked closet, we had the credit card machines with no other software installed (Office, web browsers, email, etc.) And there was only a highly secure connection from that card machine that allowed communication with the web server.