Liberal danbrome Says:
January 12th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
Fuck you Dash.
____________________________

Liberal danbrome Says:
May 10th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Pete.. “How did I slander you?” FUCK OFF YOU ASSHOLE.
____________________________

Liberal danbrome Says:
May 10th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
Pete..

You are one sick motherfucker. Why don’t you shut your god damn piehole and answer my question?

Do you or do you not stand by your slander against me?

Do NOT ANSWER MY QUESTION WITH ANOTHER QUESTIONS YOU COCKSUCKER!!!!!!!!!

Since you’ve made the allegation, I’d like you to find where chile, dash or myself called you a f**ker or a co*ksucker. Please cut and paste the instance or kiss off.

Telling lies has become a pattern for you. First saying you’re a moderate and now falsely claiming that you were swore at first. It seems you’re the one with the recall problem.

“I don’t recall”

I guess that says it all.. I think you have been hanging around Republicans too long. You guys never recall the facts!

The evidence is clear, and you just sold out.

Thanks!

You are a hypocrite and a meathead. I do not recall any of your “opponents” pete, dash or myself calling you profane and vulgar names. You’re like DJZ: you can sure dish it out but you can’t take it. Do your wife and kids know you spend time on here calling people f**kers and c**ksuckers? I’m sure they would be very proud of you.

Please reprint the posts that I was responding to so the readers can get a feel for what I was up against at the time. Fair enough?

After being insulted with personal attacks and falsehoods a few dozen times, I lose patience with my attackers and hit em back hard.

LOL

brome,

There is also a difference between implying that I might beat someone up and stating that it would have been better off had that person not been born. For example, Hugo Chavez’ mother should have held her water and drowned him.

____________________________

Let’s review some of danbrome’s posts!____________________________

Liberal danbrome Says:
January 12th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
Fuck you Dash.
____________________________

Liberal danbrome Says:
May 10th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Pete.. “How did I slander you?” FUCK OFF YOU ASSHOLE.
____________________________

Liberal danbrome Says:
May 10th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
Pete..

You are one sick motherfucker. Why don’t you shut your god damn piehole and answer my question?

Do you or do you not stand by your slander against me?

Do NOT ANSWER MY QUESTION WITH ANOTHER QUESTIONS YOU COCKSUCKER!!!!!!!!!

DJZ statement is just as bad.

I’m just surprised you find it necessary to act so immature when you are challenged. You are an adult, aren’t you?

You prove yourself to be a coward of the worst kind: someone who can dish it out and can’t take it. Although that is the typcial M.O. of a schoolyard bully.

damnbrone,

I’m not the one who said as follows:

DJZ Says:
July 5th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Intergity,
It almost makes you want to beat the shit out of them, doesn’t it. The chiles of the world are a true test.

You’re a meathead, brone: dead from the neck up.

Chris, easy on DJZ’s mom. How was she to know she was going to give birth to the devil child? I don’t think that ultrasound at the time could have detected the little horns growing from his head – and they weren’t yet pointy enough for her to feel them.

The true consistency of a pro-lifer.
That old man should be damn happy he wasn’t a targeted of one of you right wingers. He could be dead like the doctor, security guard, church goers or the cops.

You guys lose a few elections and you get murderous. Like a bunch of subjects used to their tin pot dictator.

You are demonstrating that you are not only pompous, but vile and threatening too. I thought that was Chestnut’s job here.

How much credibility do you think you have after saying to DJZ..

“Your mother should have held her water and drowned you.”

Grow up. I’m serious.

Your union-thug mentality doesn’t impress me much. The last time I personally saw the union-thugs in action was in Rochester during the 2004 campaign. A couple of union thugs elbowed a 75 year old man in the ribs for carrying a Bush-Cheney sign across the street from a DFL event.

Fortunately, the Supreme Court upheld the Second Amendment which gives me the right to defend myself if someone like you ever tried to “beat the shit” out of me.

Your mother should have held her water and drowned you. You know, people like you are dangerous. You actually advocate government action against people you disagree with or otherwise envy. Conservatives on the other hand just want to live our own lives and be left alone — and leave others alone as well.

You’d actually do very well in Iran right now. You’re the type that would be turning into the Mullahs the people who are marching in the street for their freedoms. It’s a sad day when our president is on the side of the Mullahs and not the Iranian people marching for freedom.

Liberal danbrome: pro abortion

Liberal danbrome: pro flag burning

Regarding post #103..

Why are you so bitter? Is it Former Senator Norm Coleman’s gracious concession that has you so pissed off?

Are you truly so dense.

Neither Integrity or I would ever participate in a cross or flag burning. We love our country just as much as you do.

The point is that flag burning is currently a protected right, even though neither of us would exercise this right.

As with every other issue you choose to debate here, your tunnel vision has prevented you from accepting any point of view that you don’t agree with.

You have every right to disagree with current law, but I suggest you stick with the facts and skip the pompous babble.

For one day DJZ decides to put aside his anti-American hope-and-change-socialism bullshit, and consider himself a patriot.

Come July 5th it’s time for take off his plastic Uncle Sam hat. There is much more progessive work to be done by his socialist heroes. Up next: Socialized medicine and the Fart Tax.

Cross burning is a hate crime. Flag burning – as a symbol of hatred towards the United States of America – is not.

Integrity’s position is that – “Those men and women who died defending our freedom didn’t defend it just for some of us, or for just some of the aspects of our freedoms, they died defending ALL of them.”

My position is that they fought to protect us and the rest of the free world from from tyrants, kings, and dictators – who wanted to take our freedoms away. Those who fought prior to 1989 didn’t do so to protect the right to burn a flag. I seriously doubt those who’ve fought since have done so either.

Liberal danbrome and Integrity, this one’s or you … http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/k/F/pricelessflagburner.jpg

If he left the country today, it would be instantly better.

He proclaims to ignorantly love his country but strongly hate his countrymen.

A weak and tragic individual.

Who asked you anyway?

Integrity,

I’d equate cross burning and flag burning as being equally vile. If one is protected under the First Amendment, I think both should be. Otherwise, it would be fine by me if both were punishable by law.

I’m afraid Integrity has it right. Your latest response demostrates your childish behavior when confronted with an opinion you disagree with.

I respect your right to hold whatever position you want about the flag, including wringing your hands when reminded that flag burning is currently a protected right.

However, your rant that falsely accuses Integrity of being a flag burner is uncalled for, and frankly immature. Integrity is a good man, and does not deserve the insult you just delivered to him.

When you get done with burning flags on this Fourth of July, save up your contempt for this country for a few months. Wait until Veterans Day, go to a Veterans Day celebration and try another one of your flag burnings. I predict those veterans will exercise their right to kick your ass.

Integrity: Promoting Flag Burning on July 4. 2009

Those men and women who died defending our freedom didn’t defend it just for some of us, or for just some of the aspects of our freedoms, they died defending ALL of them. That’s the part you’re not understanding. They defended the symbol of our country, the flag, and they also defended our right as free American to burn that flag in protest. That’s a fact that you can’t argue against. Plain and simple.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_7qdIEfnHoDg/Rb54RAdpDwI/AAAAAAAAANM/sMp1AWBmE9U/iwa+jima.jpg

What are you going to say next, that Americans and fought and died for the right to kill babies???

Americans have fought and died to protect the freedoms we take for granted every day. Freedoms such as the freedom of speech. Burning the flag is protected under free speech. You can disagree with the SCOTUS on the decision, but that still doesn’t change the facts.

Burning the flag is not treason; it is a protected form of speech. Don’t confuse your emotions with what the facts are.

Flag burning – won of the worst SCOTUS decisions ever. Desecration of the flag is treason.

Since the SCOTUS decision, both the House and Senate have repeatedly supported a proposed constitutional ammendment, making flag desecration illegal. The repeated attempts at passing a resolution have failed only because the Senate has never reached the 2/3 requirement for passage.

Liberals like Reid and Feinstein have voted in favor of it. Hell, even the mollycoddled Mark Dayton voted for it.

I am well aware that there are limits on free speech. I shouldn’t have said “all speech” and assumed everyone would understand. I guess I need to explain things a little bit more.

What I was trying to point out is that all speech that has been deemed by the Constitution and/or the courts to be “free” is protected. The point is that not all speech that has been labeled as “free” is going to be something that you will agree with. That doesn’t mean that it doesn’t deserve the same defense and protection as speech that you do agree with.

Just because you might not agree with flag burning being protected under free speech doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t fight tooth and nail to keep that speech free.

“All speech is free and protected, not just the speech you happen to agree with.”

Actually, there many upon many restrictions to free speech. You’re ignorance is astounding, even danbrome knows that.

“Noteworthy Point: Cross Burning is a “Hate Crime” while flag burning is free speech.”

I’m well aware that the Supreme Court has ruled flag burning is free speech. I guess that when you wipe your ass with the flag that is free speech as well.

Its a unique and wonderful country where we change power between opposing views and there is no bloodshed.

Remember, our founders had big problems with each other too. There was strong philosophies on how to run the new government and some had others followed and spied on to be sure they could be trusted.

What we do here is no different except we dont’ do it face to face.

Are you saying that burning the flag is not free speech? Unless this another case where there was a conspiracy within the court, check the SCOTUS records to read about it.

There is a clear distinction between the connotations of burning a cross and burning the flag. Even danbrome knows that.

Sam was right in his previous post about free speech. The true test is allowing a person to speak and advocate about things that make your blood boil. All speech is free and protected, not just the speech you happen to agree with. You’ve heard the cliché that freedom isn’t free I’m sure; this sort of free speech is a good example.

I wouldn’t think either crossburning or flag burning would be hate crimes.

Piss off. You are such a hypocrite it’s not even funny. You sit there and preach that you’re above partisanship while calling people who disagree with you treasonous. Go F-yourself.

Noteworthy Point: Cross Burning is a “Hate Crime” while flag burning is free speech.

As far as fights and duels: http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2008/05/07/senator-murphy-challenges-pawlenty-spokesman-to-a-fight/

Meanwhile in New York is they slighty more civil, with Democratic Legislators shutting off lights and locking the chamber doors to keep Republicans out.

The difference between those like you, and those like me is that your political ideology seems to rise above everything in your life. Therefore you can’t see anyone who believes different as being patriotic or having the right to even call themselves an American.

You, Chile and chestnut need the 4th more than anybody. Our Founders were not political allies at all. There were fights and even a couple of duels, yes the pulling of guns to make a point. However, they know where the line was and that they enemy was the Crown, not the strong National structure that Hamilton desired, or the loose agrarian society Jefferson spoke of or the imperialistic state that Monroe believed in. It was little of all and most of none.

Your attitude of conservative politics IS Americanism is, well its xenophobic and dangerous to the Republic. Treasonous? Maybe.
—————–
For the most part chile, I’ll be cooking out, drinking beer, playing with kiddies, hanging with neighbors and family, and setting off our fireworks before watching the main display.

What are you going to do? Burn a cross?

I’m not impressed by your B.S. either. There is no evidence — let alone proof — that anyone was disinfranchised in Florida let alone a conspiracy to cook the vote tallies. You are a Kool Aid drinker and you better be careful what they spike it with Sam.

Me thinks you doth protest too much about Rush. Ever actually listen to his show? It’s amazing to hear you people smear the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News. As many millions that actually listen to him (as opposed to people who pretend to listen and take soundbites out of context off of far left websites) and watch Fox, it’s axiomatic that they aren’t all right wing conservatives.

By the way I’d take Rush’s rhetoric any day over the absolute hate that’s spewed on the Daily Kooks or over on MSNBC. The kind of hate that you yourself bring here every time you post. I’m not going to accept that you’re taking the high road this Fourth of July. You may not be here, but your attitude towards your political opponents isn’t going to be checked at the door.

Me thinks you doth protest too much about Rush. Ever actually listen to his show? It’s amazing to hear you people smear the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News. As many millions that actually listen to him (as opposed to people who pretend to listen and take soundbites out of context off of far left websites) and watch Fox, it’s axiomatic that they aren’t all right wing conservatives.

By the way I’d take Rush’s rhetoric any day over the absolute hate that’s spewed on the Daily Kooks or over on MSNBC. The kind of hate that you yourself bring here every time you post. I’m not going to accept that you’re taking the high road this Fourth of July. You may not be here, but your attitude towards your political opponents isn’t going to be checked at the door.

Until then, I’ll make sure to sing you losers to sleep while you cry over Franken’s victory and naughty language on a sign. Nobody cares about your whining and nobody’s going to vote for a bunch of hypocritical babies who have suddenly decided that the right to vote is important. Disenfranchising a hundred thousand black people in Florida illegally, creating and supporting voting machines with no paper trail that can be easily hacked (Re: Florida Republican congressman who paid a computer expert to steal the election for him) and calling Al Gore a sore loser for wanthing to have a recount.

Note to the hypocritical crying losers: acting like babies does not impress us. Prepare to lose a whole lot more if you don’t change your ways.

Until midnight tonight though- its still on let’s hear from you.

I don’t know what else to say Chrissy. Rush has proven himself to be the absolute worst example of America’s superiority. The worst.

There is nothing noble, honest, integral, or admirable (except that paycheck) about the man. He’s worst than any politician or a hateful individual as he has none of the accountability or balls.

It says a lot about you, that you admire and honor such an individual.

You guys lost an election, not a war. Suck it up and come back without trying to completely discredit the humanity of your opposition.

Are you skilled enough to do that?