<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WALZ&#8217;S BOTCHED HEALTHCARE ROLLOUT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/11/07/walzs-botched-healthcare-rollout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/11/07/walzs-botched-healthcare-rollout/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: danbrome</title>
		<link>http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/11/07/walzs-botched-healthcare-rollout/comment-page-1/#comment-312025</link>
		<dc:creator>danbrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/?p=10051#comment-312025</guid>
		<description>By the way, does anybody know if the GOP will be running Doctor 32.9% again?  Since the sky is falling these days (according to Luke anyway), maybe he can hit 33% in 2010?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, does anybody know if the GOP will be running Doctor 32.9% again?  Since the sky is falling these days (according to Luke anyway), maybe he can hit 33% in 2010?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danbrome</title>
		<link>http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/11/07/walzs-botched-healthcare-rollout/comment-page-1/#comment-312024</link>
		<dc:creator>danbrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/?p=10051#comment-312024</guid>
		<description>Nice job Luke.

Blast Congressman Walz, yet completely botch the facts!

Even Chris admits your rhetoric is bogus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job Luke.</p>
<p>Blast Congressman Walz, yet completely botch the facts!</p>
<p>Even Chris admits your rhetoric is bogus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/2009/11/07/walzs-botched-healthcare-rollout/comment-page-1/#comment-312020</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotademocratsexposed.com/?p=10051#comment-312020</guid>
		<description>Luke,

As much as I wish it weren&#039;t the case, CQ lists the race as likely Democratic.

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=district-2010-MN-01


And we do have a candidate running in the First: Allen Quist.  The question I would like answered is whether the Republican Party of Minnesota will back Quist if he gets the endorsement against any potential primary challengers.  Last time, the MN GOP backed the endorsed candidate against veteran legislator Senator Day and the endorsed candidate got less than 33% against Walz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke,</p>
<p>As much as I wish it weren&#8217;t the case, CQ lists the race as likely Democratic.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=district-2010-MN-01" rel="nofollow">http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=district-2010-MN-01</a></p>
<p>And we do have a candidate running in the First: Allen Quist.  The question I would like answered is whether the Republican Party of Minnesota will back Quist if he gets the endorsement against any potential primary challengers.  Last time, the MN GOP backed the endorsed candidate against veteran legislator Senator Day and the endorsed candidate got less than 33% against Walz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

